SHORT COMMUNICATION
Matiar MADANCHI1*, Riccardo CURATOLO1, Hazem A. JURATLI1, Cristina MANGAS2 and Carlo MAINETTI3
1Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Basel, Burgfelderstrasse 101, CH-4055 Basel, 2Dermatology and Oncology Department, Istituto Oncologico Svizzera Italiana (IOSI), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Bellinzona, and 3Private Practice dermatology, Bellinzona, Switzerland. *E-mail: matiar.madanchi@usb.ch
Citation: Acta Derm Venereol 2024; 104: adv40950. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/actadv.v104.40950.
Copyright: © 2024 The Author(s). Published by MJS Publishing, on behalf of the Society for Publication of Acta Dermato-Venereologica. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
Submitted: Jun 5, 2024; Accepted after revision: Aug 6, 2024; Published: Aug 23, 2024
Competing interests and funding: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Over the years, we have frequently observed that patients suffering from eczema or prurigo, usually on the back, and receiving long-term treatment with very strong topical corticosteroids like clobetasol propionate, often develop reactive perforating collagenosis during treatment. Based on this observation, we have developed 2 hypotheses regarding the association between high-potency topical corticosteroids and the aggravation of reactive perforating collagenosis.
Reactive perforating collagenosis is a subtype of perforating collagenosis (1, 2). Reactive perforating collagenosis is defined by the trans-epithelial elimination of altered collagen (1). It can be either familial or acquired. Usually, it manifests in patients of middle age, between 50 and 60 years old (1, 3). It typically presents as disseminated or linearly grouped erythematous, firm papules or plaques with central ulceration and a hard, firmly adherent keratotic plug (1, 2). Its pathophysiology is not yet well understood, leading to various theories and hypotheses in this respect. It has been observed that reactive perforating collagenosis can be caused by various factors (Table SI) including malignancy (4), infections, or medications such as sorafenib (2). It has been also observed that reactive perforating collagenosis is often associated with microvascular disorders, such as in patients with diabetes mellitus, chronic renal disease, or hypertension (5).
Topical steroids are used for many dermatological conditions and are available in various formulations (creams, ointments, lotions, foams) (6). The main goal of topical steroids is to reduce inflammation and irritation (6, 7). However, they are known to have side effects such as skin atrophy and decreased collagen synthesis (8). Topical steroids can be classified into potency classes based on their vasoconstrictive properties (Table SII) (6). Steroids with higher vasoconstrictive action are classified as very strong topical steroids, while those with less vasoconstrictive action are classified as mild topical steroids, which may be less effective but have fewer side effects (6).
In our cases, we have frequently observed the development or an aggravation of reactive perforating collagenosis in patients undergoing steroid therapy with clobetasol propionate (very strong). We have observed a higher incidence in patients affected by atopic dermatitis or prurigo nodularis who undergo treatment with ointments compared with creams. This may be attributed to the occlusive nature of ointment treatments, leading to stronger steroid effects than with creams. However, we have also noticed that simply changing the class of the topical steroid from very strong to strong/mild, such as mometasone furoate, often led to resolution of the reactive perforating collagenosis.
Therefore, as a first hypothesis, we suspect that the high vasoconstrictive capacity of high-potency topical steroids may, like diabetes mellitus or hypertension (2), disrupt microcirculation, thereby favouring the formation of reactive perforating collagenosis.
A second hypothesis involves decreased collagen synthesis mediated by p38 in the skin. According to the study by Quoc-Vu Le et al. (9), it is reported that the use of clobetasol propionate negatively regulates the transcription factor of collagen synthesis via p38 mammalian MAP kinase (9, 10). Further studies are needed to confirm these hypotheses. However, this could be an important point to study in order to better understand the pathophysiology of reactive perforating collagenosis, to gain a deeper insight into the disease, and to find a targeted treatment for this condition in the future.
Topical steroids are among the therapeutic choices for reactive perforating collagenosis. In our cases, we observed that changing from very strong corticosteroids to strong/mild topical steroids was often sufficient to treat the condition in patients who developed reactive perforating collagenosis after strong corticosteroid application.
Therefore, we consider it extremely important to further investigate our hypothesis to better understand the pathophysiology of reactive perforating collagenosis and to use more appropriate treatment, thereby avoiding delays in initiating suitable therapy.