RESEARCH LETTER

Paradoxical Associations Between Sun-Protective Behaviours and Mortality: Evidence From a Nationally Representative Cohort

Xiaofeng LIANG1#, Zhishen PENG2#, Peixian CHEN3#, Ying DENG4#*, Jinglin GAO1, Yongyi Liang5 and Yujing NIU6

1Dermatology Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 2Guangdong Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou; The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 3Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 4Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 5College of Chemistry and Environment, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang City, and 6Division of Nephrology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. *E-mail: rebeccatung@163.com; #Joint first authorship.

 

Citation: Acta Derm Venereol 2025; 105: adv44507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/actadv.v105.44507.

Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s). Published by MJS Publishing, on behalf of the Society for Publication of Acta Dermato-Venereologica. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

Submitted: Jul 29, 2025. Accepted after revision: Aug 11, 2025. Published: Sep 2, 2025.

Competing interests and funding: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

 

To the Editor,

The impact of sun-protective behaviours on health has long been a controversial topic. To prevent photodamage and reduce the risk of skin cancer, a variety of sun-protective measures are recommended by the American Academy of Dermatology (1). These measures include seeking shade, minimizing sun exposure during peak daylight hours, wearing protective clothing such as long sleeves, applying sunscreen, and wearing sunglasses (1). On the other hand, sunlight exposure is essential for human health. First, sunlight facilitates the synthesis of vitamin D, reducing the risk of osteoporosis, osteopenia, and fractures in adults (2). Insufficient sunlight exposure has been linked to depression and cognitive decline (3). An increasing number of epidemiological studies suggest that sunlight exposure is associated with a reduced risk of several chronic diseases, such as cancer, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease (4, 5). Given that, we conducted a cohort analysis using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) to directly investigate the impact of sun-protective behaviours on all-cause mortality.

Data from 3 survey cycles (2003–2006, 2009–2012, and 2015–2018) were extracted and analysed, encompassing health information from 59,988 individuals. After excluding participants with missing key variables or non-response to dermatology questionnaires, the final analytical sample consisted of 12,065 individuals aged 20–59 years. Baseline characteristics of the participants are summarized in Table SI (including detailed definitions of the variables).

The Cox regression model (with specific adjusted confounders listed in Table SII) revealed significant heterogeneity in the association between sun protection behaviours and all-cause mortality. This paradoxical association persisted in the fully adjusted model (shade: HR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.50-0.86, p = 0.002; sunscreen use: HR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.02–1.99, p = 0.038). In the subsequent subgroup analysis, we observed that participants with rare shading behaviour consistently exhibited a lower risk of mortality across various age groups, particularly in the younger cohort (HR = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.19–0.75, p = 0.005), compared with the 40–60 age group (HR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.55–0.98, p = 0.038). Regarding racial differences, non-Hispanic Black participants with rare shading behaviour had a significantly reduced mortality risk (HR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.26–0.81, p = 0.007). In contrast, non-Hispanic White participants using sunscreen moderately (HR = 1.64, 95% CI: 1.02–2.63, p = 0.039) or rarely (HR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.06–2.48, p = 0.026) showed higher mortality risk. The results for the other subgroups are presented in Table SII.

To our knowledge, this is the world’s first large prospective cohort study using NHANES data to examine the relationship between sun protection behaviours and all-cause mortality. In summary, our study demonstrates that rarely seeking shade is associated with a reduced risk of mortality, whereas rare use of sunscreen is linked to an increased risk. Non-Hispanic Black individuals might benefit from more sun, whereas White individuals especially need sunscreen. Future research should further explore to refine public health guidelines.

Our study has several limitations. Self-reported sun protection behaviours may suffer from recall or social desirability bias, and unmeasured factors (e.g., genetics, lifestyle, vitamin D supplementation, or UV exposure) could confound the results. Using broad categories for these behaviours might mask dose-response effects. Additionally, a single serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D measurement may not reflect long-term status and we did not assess regional/seasonal UV differences or account for sunscreen formulations and SPF ratings.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Availability of data and materials: Data were extracted from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES, https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/).

REFERENCES

  1. American Association of Dermatology. How to prevent skin cancer (2025). Available from: https://www.aad.org/public/diseases/skin-cancer/prevent/how
  2. Samefors M, Tengblad A, Östgren CJ. Sunlight exposure and vitamin D levels in older people: an intervention study in Swedish nursing homes. J Nutr Health Aging 2020; 24: 1047–1052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-020-1435-z
  3. Kim SY, Bang M, Wee JH, Min C, Yoo DM, Han SM, et al. Short- and long-term exposure to air pollution and lack of sunlight are associated with an increased risk of depression: a nested case-control study using meteorological data and national sample cohort data. Sci Total Environ 2021; 757: 143960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143960
  4. Afzal S, Brøndum-Jacobsen P, Bojesen SE, Nordestgaard BG. Genetically low vitamin D concentrations and increased mortality: Mendelian randomisation analysis in three large cohorts. BMJ 2014; 349: g6330. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g6330
  5. Yang S, Dai F, Wang Z, Li R, Xu X, Li C, et al. Association between sun-protective behaviors and hypertension: a cross-sectional study from national health and nutrition examination survey 2009 to 2014. BMC Public Health 2023; 23: 1862. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16439-4