Clinicians’ perceptions of manual handling policies in stroke rehabilitation: a qualitative focus group study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/jrmcc.v7.23836Keywords:
Stroke rehabilitation, Handling policies, Work related musculoskeletal disorders, physiotherapy, nursingAbstract
Objectives: The professional literature guides manual handling in numerous health care settings. The effects of these guidelines on stroke rehabilitation and the clinical communication of health care professionals are unknown. This paper aims to investigate the perspectives of nurses and physiotherapists on handling guidelines in their professions to identify conflicts in opinions to provide optimum care to people with stroke.
Design: A qualitative focus group study.
Methods: Three focus groups were conducted. The participants were physiotherapists or nurses with 1 year of stroke care experience. The data were thematically analysed.
Results: Nineteen participants (12 physiotherapists and 7 nurses) were interviewed. The data analysis revealed 3 themes. First, “The application of handling in stroke rehabilitation” includes clinical reasoning and real-world handling practices. The second theme, “Physical Effects on Therapists,” examines the long-term effects of manual handling on therapists, including work-related musculoskeletal disorders. The final theme, “Conflicts among health care professionals,” investigates stroke rehabilitation equipment conflicts between nurses and physiotherapists.
Conclusion: The study concludes that stroke transfer guidelines in the specialised literature may impact health care professionals’ perspectives. Conflicts among health care professionals can impair teamwork. Thus, health care professionals should work together as stroke rehabilitation teams to develop unified transfer guidelines that aid rehabilitation and avoid work-related musculoskeletal disorders.
Downloads
References
Abdul Halim NS, Mohd Ripin IZ, Ridzwan MI. Efficacy of interventions in reducing the risks of work-related musculoskeletal disor-ders among healthcare workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Workplace Health Saf 2023; 71: 557–576.
https://doi.org/10.1177/21650799231185335 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21650799231185335
Vieira ER, Schneider P, Guidera C, Gadotti IC, Brunt D. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among physical therapists: a sys-tematic review. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2016; 29: 417–428.
https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-150649 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR-150649
Vieira ER, Svoboda S, Belniak A, Brunt D, Rose-St Prix C, Roberts L, et al. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among physi-cal therapists: an online survey. Disabil Rehabil 2016; 38: 552–557.
https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2015.1049375 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2015.1049375
Gorce P, Jacquier-Bret J. Global prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among physiotherapists: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2023; 24: 265.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06345-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06345-6
Alatawi SF. Current clinical practices of Saudi physiotherapists in stroke rehabilitation. JACPT 2021; 12: 194–204. https://doi.org/10.1097/JAT.0000000000000165 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JAT.0000000000000165
Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. Guidance on manual handling in physiotherapy [Internet]. [cited 2023 September 24]. Availa-ble from: https://www.csp.org.uk/publications/guidance-manual-handling-physiotherapy-4th-edition.
Milhem M, Kalichman L, Ezra D, Alperovitch-Najenson D. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among physical therapists: a comprehensive narrative review. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2016; 29: 735–747.
https://doi.org/10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00620 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00620
Occupational Safety and Health Association. Guidelines for nursing homes: ergonomics for the prevention of musculoskeletal disor-ders [Internet]. [cited 2023 September 17]. Available from: https://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/final_nh_guidelines.pdf
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention – National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health 2018. Safe patient handling and mobility [Internet]. [cited 2023 September 14]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/safepatient/default.html.
Jacquier-Bret J, Gorce P. Prevalence of body area work-related musculoskeletal disorders among healthcare professionals: a syste-matic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2023; 20: 841.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010841 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010841
Tang K, Diaz J, Lui O, Proulx L, Galle E, Packham T. Do active assist transfer devices improve transfer safety for patients and caregi-vers in hospital and community settings? A scoping review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2020; 15: 614–624.
https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2019.1604822 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2019.1604822
Royal college of nursing. Moving and handling [Internet]. [cited 2023 September 20]. Available from: https://www.rcn.org.uk/Get-Help/RCN-advice/moving-and-handling.
Nolan D, O’Sullivan K, Stephenson J, O’Sullivan P, Lucock M. How do manual handling advisors and physiotherapists construct their back beliefs, and do safe lifting posture beliefs influence them? Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2019; 39: 101–106.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2018.11.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2018.11.009
Nolan D, O’Sullivan K, Stephenson J, Sullivan P, Lucock M. What do physiotherapists and manual handling advisors consider the safest lifting posture, and do back beliefs influence their choice? Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2018; 33: 35–40.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2017.10.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2017.10.010
De Almeida PM, Santo A, Dias B, Faria CF, Gonçalves D, Silva MC, et al. Hands-on physiotherapy interventions and stroke and inter-national classification of functionality, disability and health outcomes: a systematic review. Eur J Physiother 2015; 17: 100–115.
https://doi.org/10.3109/21679169.2015.1044466 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/21679169.2015.1044466
Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Motor control: translating research into clinical practice. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.
Stinear CM, Lang CE, Zeiler S, Byblow WD. Advances and
challenges in stroke rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol 2020; 19: 348–360.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30415-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30415-6
Glover W, McGregor A, Sullivan C, Hague J. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders affecting members of the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. Physiotherapy 2005; 91: 138–147.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2005.06.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2005.06.001
Snodgrass SJ, Rivett DA, Thumb pain in physiotherapists: potential risk factors and proposed prevention strategies. J Man Manip Ther 2002; 10: 206–217.
https://doi.org/10.1179/106698102790819111 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/106698102790819111
American stroke association [Internet]. [cited 2023 September 24]. Available from: https://www.stroke.org/en/life-after-stroke/recovery/daily-living.
Lee KE, Choi M, Jeoung B. Effectiveness of rehabilitation exercise in improving physical function of stroke patients: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 5: 19.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912739 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912739
Maier M, Ballester BR, Verschure PFMJ. Principles of neurorehabilitation after stroke based on motor learning and brain plasticity mechanisms. Front Syst Neurosci 2019;13: 74.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2019.00074 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2019.00074
Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health 2002; 23: 334–340.
https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G
Kitzinger J. Qualitative research: introducting focus groups. BMJ 1995; 311: 299–302.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299
Warr DJ “It was fun… but we don’t usually talk about these things”: analyzing sociable interaction in focus groups. Qual Inq 2005; 11: 200–225.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800404273412 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800404273412
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006; 3: 77–101.
https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Salem F. Alatawi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All articles in JRM-CC are Open Access and, unless otherwise specified, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This license permits sharing, adapting, and using the material for any purpose, including commercial use, with the condition of providing full attribution to the original publication.
