Defining Patient Profiles After the 2023 Kahramanmaraş, Turkey Earthquake

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/jrmcc.v7.40039

Keywords:

earthquake, rehabilitation, nerve injuries, plexus injuries

Abstract

Objective: On 6 February 2023, 2 earthquakes with magnitudes of 7.7 and 7.6 mW occurred in Pazarcık and Elbistan districts of Kahramanmaraş province (Turkey) and affected 11 provinces in total, especially Hatay, Malatya, and Adıyaman. Here, we report 3 earthquake victims in order to define patients profiles.

Case reports: Three patients who were taken to the orthopedic and neurological rehabilitation program in our inpatient Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation unit after the earthquake are presented. Our first case, a 46-year-old man, remained in the debris for 8.5 h. His left leg was left in the wreckage, and he later developed a drop foot on the left due to compartment syndrome, which developed with pain and swelling in the left calf. There is no fasciotomy procedure. Venous Doppler was reported to be within normal limits. Our second case is a 52-year-old man who was in the debris for 36 h and has a left braxial plexus injury and a left drop foot. He has Buerger’s disease in his medical history. The third case is an 8-year-old girl trapped in rubble during the earthquake with a right orbital fracture and a left foot transmetarsal amputation. She has no neurological signs.

Discussion: The patients that apply to our Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation clinic are especially amputees, patients with traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, peripheral nerve damage, plexus damage, multiple fractures, joint limitations and soft tissue loss in the musculoskeletal system. After the earthquake, we encountered patients from a wide variety of spectrums in our clinic. In addition to primary musculoskeletal injuries, they also experience systemic problems affecting the musculoskeletal system. Additionally, thrombosis, infection, renal failure, and multiple organ failures may also occur.

Conclusion: Countries should develop guidelines for disaster preparedness and establish coordination units that can take quick action, make decisions, and communicate in times of disaster. A good definition of patient clinical profiles after the earthquake will ensure early intervention and prevent permanent disability and functional losses.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Uluöz M, Gökmen MY. The 2023 Turkey earthquake: management of 627 pediatric musculoskeletal injuries in the first month. Children (Basel) 2023; 10: 1733.

https://doi.org/10.3390/children10111733 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/children10111733

Yabe Y, Hagiwara Y, Sekiguchi T, Sugawara Y, Tsuchiya M, Itaya N, et al. Musculoskeletal pain and new-onset poor physical function in elderly survivors of a natural disaster: a longitudinal study after the great East Japan earthquake. BMC Geriatr 2019; 19: 274.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1283-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1283-z

Long B, Liang SY, Gottlieb M. Crush injury and syndrome: a review for emergency clinicians. Am J Emerg Med 2023; 69: 180–187.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2023.04.029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2023.04.029

Genthon A, Wilcox SR. Crush syndrome: a case report and review of the literature. J Emerg Med 2014; 46: 313–319.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.08.052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.08.052

Görmeli G, Görmeli CA, Güner S, Ceylan MF, Dursun R. 2011 Van depremini yaşayan fasyotomi yapılan hastaların klinik analizi [A clini-cal analysis of patients undergoing fasciotomy who experienced the 2011 Van earthquake]. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 2012; 23: 156–160.

Lin YM, Lee TS. Fasciotomy in crush syndrome patients: debates continue. Emerg Med J 2005; 22: 78.

Kundakci B, Mirioglu A, Tekin M, Bagir M, Bicer OS, Arslan YK, et al. 6 February 2023, orthopedic experience in Kahramanmaraş earth-quake and surgical decision in patients with crush syndrome. J Orthop Surg Res 2023; 18: 537.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04001-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04001-2

Ulusoy S, Kılınç İ, Oruç M, Özdemir B, Ergani HM, Keskin ÖH, et al. Analysis of wound types and wound care methods after the 2023 Kahramanmaras earthquake. Jt Dis Relat Surg 2023; 34: 488–496.

https://doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2023.1128 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2023.1128

Ahrari MN, Zangiabadi N, Asadi A, Sarafi Nejad A. Prevalence and distribution of peripheral nerve injuries in victims of Bam earthquake. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 2006; 46: 59–62

Uzun N, Kiziltan ME, Savrun FK. 1999 Marmara earthquake; peripheral nerve injuries – electrophysiologic evaluation. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 2005; 45: 3–13.

Yoshida T, Tada K, Uemura K, Yonenobu K. Peripheral nerve palsies in victims of the Hanshin-Awaji earthquake. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999; 362: 208-217.

https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199905000-00030. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199905000-00030

Published

2024-04-02

How to Cite

Koca, T. T. (2024). Defining Patient Profiles After the 2023 Kahramanmaraş, Turkey Earthquake. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine - Clinical Communications, 7, jrmcc40039. https://doi.org/10.2340/jrmcc.v7.40039

Issue

Section

Case Report

Categories