Experimental invivo model to evaluate the impact of Cernitin™ on pain response on induced chronic bladder inflammation

Authors

  • Céline Augé
  • Nishtman Dizeyi
  • Lena Ramnemark
  • Philippe Lluel
  • Magnus Grabe

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/21681805.2022.2090602

Abstract

Abstract Objective Inflammation of the urinary bladder may cause burdensome pain also called bladder pain syndrome (BPS). A limitation in understanding BPS pathophysiology is the lack of appropriate preclinical model. Previously published clinical and preclinical studies revealed positive impact of Cernitin™ on pain relief in chronic prostatitis. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of Cernitin™ on induced inflammation of the urinary bladder in rats. We also sought to identify biomarkers which might play a role in the management of BPS. Materials and methods Cystitis was induced by injection of cyclophosphamide (CYP) in female rats. Thereafter, animals were randomly divided into four treatment groups and two control groups. Evaluation of pain scores was assessed by von Frey assay. Expression of pain- and pro-inflammatory biomarkers was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and immunohistochemistry. Results Treatments with Cernitin™ displayed significant anti-nociceptive effects on CYP-induced visceral pain (p < .01). In contrast, vehicle-treated animals showed high pain score even at the lowest force. Furthermore, results of ELISA showed that Cernitin™-treated animals had significantly reduced levels of COX-2 (T60, p < .01; GBX, p  Conclusions Cernitin™ components reduced pain score and inflammatory marker COX-2. Our findings suggest a potential therapeutic role for Cernitin™ in the management of BPS.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2022-07-04

How to Cite

Augé, C., Dizeyi, N., Ramnemark, L., Lluel, P., & Grabe, M. (2022). Experimental invivo model to evaluate the impact of Cernitin™ on pain response on induced chronic bladder inflammation. Scandinavian Journal of Urology, 56(4), 320–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681805.2022.2090602

Issue

Section

Articles