How breast cancer recurrences are found – a real-world, prospective cohort study

Abstract

Background

There is very limited data available on how most breast cancer recurrences, either distant metastases or locoregional recurrences (LRR), are actually discovered in routine clinical practice.

Patients and methods

From a prospective cohort of 621 women diagnosed and treated for early invasive breast cancer between 2003 and 2013, we analysed the patients who were later diagnosed with distant metastases (n = 61) and the patients who had locoregional recurrences (LRR; n = 34). The patients had routine control visits for up to 10 years from initial diagnosis, with annual clinical visits, mammography, blood count, plasma creatinine and liver function tests.

Results

Most distant metastases (n = 38, 62%) were found when a patient contacted health care services because of a symptom; only ten (16%) were detected at pre-planned control visits. The most common first sign or symptom of metastasis was pain (n = 23, 38%). Pain as the first indicator of metastasis indicated a lower survival in metastatic disease (hazard ratio 4.40; 95% confidence interval 1.77–10.94; p = 0.001). How relapse was detected or whether patient was symptomatic did not affect overall survival (OS) of patients with distant metastases. LRRs were mostly found at pre-planned control visits (n = 14, 41%). Abnormalities in routine laboratory tests did not lead to any detection of recurrence.

Discussion

In this prospective, contemporary, real-world study, the vast majority of both distant metastases and LRRs were detected outside the pre-planned control visits. These results highlight the importance of finding ways to lower the threshold for contacting the surveillance unit, rather than frequent routine controls.