Automatic treatment planning of VMAT for left-sided breast cancer with lymph nodes

Authors

  • Kenni Højsgaard Engstrøm Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
  • Carsten Brink Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
  • Mette Holck Nielsen Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
  • Martin Kjellgren Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
  • Karina Gottlieb Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
  • Irene Hazell Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
  • Vibeke Nordmark Hansen Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Ebbe Laugaard Lorenzen Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2021.1983209

Keywords:

VMAT, breast, breath-hold, planning, autoplanning

Abstract

Background

The standard in Denmark for treating breast cancer patients receiving loco-regional irradiation is tangential 3D Conformal RadioTherapy (3DCRT), treated in deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH). Treating with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) may reduce the treatment time, which is particularly important for DIBH treatments. The VMAT should be performed without increased dose to the heart, lung, and contralateral breast. This study compares VMAT and 3DCRT for left-sided breast cancer patients with intramammary lymph node involvement.

Material and methods

Twenty left-sided breast cancer patients were included. VMAT and tangential plans were created for all patients, with a prescription dose of 50 Gy. The tangential plans used 6 MV and for larger breast combined with 18 MV. The VMAT plans utilised two 6 MV fields in a butterfly configuration. Dose planning was done in Pinnacle3 16.0 using the Auto-Planning module for the VMAT plans. Comparison of the plans was based on: mean doses, metrics provided by DBCG guidelines, dose-volume histograms and required number of breath-holds for treatment delivery in DIBH.

Results

For most OAR, the doses were similar for VMAT and 3DCRT. The target coverage was comparable, with VMAT having a statistically significant improved dose homogeneity of the target volumes. Less than half the number of breath-hold was required for VMAT compared to 3DCRT. Mean gamma pass rates (3 mm and 3%) from ArcCHECK of the VMAT plans was 98.4% (range 96.6–99.8%).

Conclusion

Automatic VMAT planning of left-sided breast cancer patients with lymph node involvement can produce dose distributions comparable to those of tangential 3DCRT, while reducing the number of breath-holds in DIBH by more than a factor of two. The reduction in breath-holds is beneficial for patient comfort and reduces the risk of intra-fraction patient motion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2021-11-02

How to Cite

Højsgaard Engstrøm, K., Brink, C., Holck Nielsen, M., Kjellgren, M., Gottlieb, K., Hazell, I., … Laugaard Lorenzen, E. (2021). Automatic treatment planning of VMAT for left-sided breast cancer with lymph nodes. Acta Oncologica, 60(11), 1425–1431. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2021.1983209