Target coverage and cardiopulmonary sparing with the updated ESTRO-ACROP contouring guidelines for postmastectomy radiation therapy after breast reconstruction: a treatment planning study using VMAT and proton PBS techniques

Authors

  • Michael G. Milligan Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
  • Stephen Zieminski Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
  • Andrew Johnson Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
  • Nicolas Depauw Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
  • Nikki Rosado Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
  • Michelle C. Specht Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
  • Eric C. Liao Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
  • Rachel B. Jimenez Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2021.1957499

Keywords:

Postmastectomy radiation therapy, treatment planning study, ESTRO-ACROP guidelines, immediate implant-based reconstruction

Abstract

Background

The European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Advisory Committee in Radiation Oncology Practice (ESTRO-ACROP) recently released new contouring guidelines for postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) after implant-based reconstruction (IBR). As compared to prior ESTRO guidelines, the new guidelines primarily redefined the chest wall (CW) target to exclude the breast prosthesis. In this study, we assessed the impact of these changes on treatment planning and dosimetric outcomes using volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and proton pencil-beam scanning (PBS) therapy.

Methods

We performed a treatment planning study of 10 women with left-sided breast cancer who underwent PMRT after IBR. All target structures were delineated first using standard (ESTRO) breast contouring guidelines and then separately using the new (ESTRO-ACROP) guidelines. Standard organs-at-risk (OARs) and cardiac substructures were contoured. Four sets of plans were generated: (1) VMAT using standard ESTRO contours, (2) VMAT using new ESTRO-ACROP contours, (3) PBS using standard contours, and (4) PBS using new contours.

Results

VMAT plans using the new ESTRO-ACROP guidelines resulted in modest sparing of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) (mean dose: 6.99 Gy standard ESTRO vs. 6.08 Gy new ESTRO-ACROP, p = 0.010) and ipsilateral lung (V20: 21.66% vs 19.45%, p = 0.017), but similar exposure to the heart (mean dose: 4.6 Gy vs. 4.3 Gy, p = 0.513), with a trend toward higher contralateral lung (V5: 31.0% vs 35.3%, p = 0.331) and CW doses (V5: 31.9% vs 35.4%, p = 0.599). PBS plans using the new guidelines resulted in further sparing of the heart (mean dose: 1.05 Gy(RBE) vs. 0.54 Gy(RBE), p < 0.001), nearly all cardiac substructures (LAD mean dose: 2.01 Gy(RBE) vs. 0.66 Gy(RBE), p < 0.001), and ipsilateral lung (V20: 16.22% vs 6.02%, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

PMRT after IBR using the new ESTRO-ACROP contouring guidelines with both VMAT and PBS therapy is associated with significant changes in exposure to several cardiopulmonary structures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2021-11-02

How to Cite

Milligan, M. G., Zieminski, S., Johnson, A., Depauw, N., Rosado, N., Specht, M. C., … Jimenez, R. B. (2021). Target coverage and cardiopulmonary sparing with the updated ESTRO-ACROP contouring guidelines for postmastectomy radiation therapy after breast reconstruction: a treatment planning study using VMAT and proton PBS techniques. Acta Oncologica, 60(11), 1440–1451. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2021.1957499