Tumour control probability after Ruthenium-106 brachytherapy for choroidal melanomas

Authors

  • Charlotte A. Espensen Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark;  Department of Ophthalmology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Ane L. Appelt Leeds Institute Medical Research at St James’s, University of Leeds, and Leeds Cancer Centre, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UK
  • Lotte S. Fog Department of Physical Sciences, The Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
  • Juliette Thariat Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen, France;  Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire IN2P3/ENSICAEN, Caen, France; ;Department of Unicaen, Normandy University, Caen, France
  • Anita B. Gothelf Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Marianne C. Aznar Manchester Research Cancer Centre, Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
  • Jens F. Kiilgaard Department of Ophthalmology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2020.1762925

Abstract

Purpose: Ruthenium-106 (Ru-106) brachytherapy is a common eye-preserving treatment for choroidal melanomas. However, a dose-response model describing the relationship between the actual delivered tumour dose and tumour control has, to the best of our knowledge, not previously been quantified for Ru-106 brachytherapy; we aimed to rectify this.

Material and methods: We considered consecutive patients with primary choroidal melanomas, treated with Ru-106 brachytherapy (2005–2014). Dosimetric plans were retrospectively recreated using 3D image-guided planning software. Pre-treatment fundus photographies were used to contour the tumour; post-treatment photographies to determine the accurate plaque position. Patient and tumour characteristics, treatment details, dose volume histograms, and clinical outcomes were extracted. Median follow-up was 5.0 years. The relationship between tumour dose and risk of local recurrence was examined using multivariate Cox regression modelling, with minimum physical tumour dose (D99%) as primary dose metric.

Results: We included 227 patients with median tumour height and largest base dimension of 4 mm (range 1–12, IQR 3–6) and 11 mm (range 4–23, IQR 9–13). The estimated 3 year local control was 82% (95% CI 77–88). Median D99% was 105 Gy (range 6–783, IQR 65–138); this was the most significant factor associated with recurrence (p < .0001), although tumour height, combined TTT and Ru-106 brachytherapy, and sex were also significant. The hazard ratio (HR) for a 10 Gy increase in D99% was 0.87 (95% CI 0.82–0.93). Using biological effective dose in the model resulted in no substantial difference in dose dependence estimates. Robustness cheques with D1–99% showed D99% to be the most significant dose metric for local recurrence.

Conclusion: The minimum tumour dose correlated strongly with risk of tumour recurrence, with 100 Gy needed to ensure at least 84% local control at 3 years.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2020-08-02

How to Cite

Espensen, C. A., Appelt, A. L., Fog, L. S., Thariat, J., Gothelf, A. B., Aznar, M. C., & Kiilgaard, J. F. (2020). Tumour control probability after Ruthenium-106 brachytherapy for choroidal melanomas. Acta Oncologica, 59(8), 918–925. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2020.1762925