Stable glioma incidence and increased patient survival over the past two decades in Norway: a nationwide registry-based cohort study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2024.24970Keywords:
Cancer registries, glioma, cancer incidence, cancer survival, glioma epidemiologyAbstract
Background: Surveillance of incidence and survival of central nervous system tumors is essential to monitor disease burden and epidemiological changes, and to allocate health care resources. Here, we describe glioma incidence and survival trends by histopathology group, age, and sex in the Norwegian population.
Material and methods: We included patients with a histologically verified glioma reported to the Cancer Registry of Norway from 2002 to 2021 (N = 7,048). Population size and expected mortality were obtained from Statistics Norway. Cases were followed from diagnosis until death, emigration, or 31 December 2022, whichever came first. We calculated age-standardized incidence rates (ASIR) per 100,000 person-years and age-standardized relative survival (RS).
Results: The ASIR for histologically verified gliomas was 7.4 (95% CI: 7.3–7.6) and was higher for males (8.8; 95% CI: 8.5–9.1) than females (6.1; 95% CI: 5.9–6.4). Overall incidence was stable over time. Glioblastoma was the most frequent tumor entity (ASIR = 4.2; 95% CI: 4.1–4.4). Overall, glioma patients had a 1-year RS of 63.6% (95% CI: 62.5–64.8%), and a 5-year RS of 32.8% (95% CI: 31.6–33.9%). Females had slightly better survival than males. For most entities, 1- and 5-year RS improved over time (5-year RS for all gliomas 29.0% (2006) and 33.1% (2021), p < 0.001). Across all tumor types, the RS declined with increasing age at diagnosis.
Interpretation: The incidence of gliomas has been stable while patient survival has increased over the past 20 years in Norway. As gliomas represent a heterogeneous group of primary CNS tumors, regular reporting from cancer registries at the histopathology group level is important to monitor disease burden and allocate health care resources in a population.
Downloads
References
Davis F, Nagamuthu C, Ross J, Megyesi J. Current status of brain tumor surveillance in Canada and why it matters. J Regist Manag. 2015;42:139–45.
Cancer Registry of Norway. Cancer in Norway 2022 – Cancer incidence, mortality, survival and prevalence in Norway. Oslo: Cancer Registry of Norway; 2023. Availble from: https://www.kreftregisteret.no/globalassets/cancer-in-norway/2022/cin_report-2022.pdf [cited 2023 Nov 2]
Louis DN, Perry A, Wesseling P, et al. The 2021 WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Neuro-Oncology. 2021;23(8):1231–51. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noab106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noab106
Rasmussen BK, Hansen S, Laursen RJ, et al. Epidemiology of glioma: clinical characteristics, symptoms, and predictors of glioma patients grade I–IV in the the Danish Neuro-Oncology Registry. J Neuro-Oncol. 2017;135:571–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-017-2607-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-017-2607-5
Natukka T, Raitanen J, Haapasalo H, Auvinen A. Incidence trends of adult malignant brain tumors in Finland, 1990–2016. Acta Oncol. 2019;58:990–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2019.1603396 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2019.1603396
Crocetti E, Trama A, Stiller C, et al. Epidemiology of glial and non-glial brain tumours in Europe. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48:1532–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2011.12.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2011.12.013
Ostrom QT, Bauchet L, Davis FG, et al. The epidemiology of glioma in adults: a “state of the science” review. Neuro-oncology. 2014;16:896–913. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nou087 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nou087
Lin D, Wang M, Chen Y, et al. Trends in intracranial glioma incidence and mortality in the United States, 1975–2018. Front Oncol. 2021;11:748061. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.748061 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.748061
Ostrom QT, Cote DJ, Ascha M, Kruchko C, Barnholtz-Sloan JS. Adult glioma incidence and survival by race or ethnicity in the United States from 2000 to 2014. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4:e181789. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.1789 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.1789
Skaga E, Skretteberg MA, Johannesen TB, et al. Real-world validity of randomized controlled phase III trials in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: to whom do the results of the trials apply? Neuro-Oncol Adv. 2021;3:vdab008. https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdab008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdab008
Jakola AS, Skjulsvik AJ, Myrmel KS, et al. Surgical resection versus watchful waiting in low-grade gliomas. Ann Oncol. 2017;28:1942–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx230 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx230
Larsen IK, Småstuen M, Johannesen TB, et al. Data quality at the Cancer Registry of Norway: an overview of comparability, completeness, validity and timeliness. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:1218–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.037
Parkin DM, Bray F. Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods Part II. Completeness. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45:756–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.11.033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.11.033
Cancer Registry of Norway. Cancer in Norway 2020 – Technical supplement: statistical methods. Oslo: Cancer Registry of Norway; 2020.
Ostrom QT, Price M, Neff C, et al. CBTRUS statistical report: primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2016–2020. Neuro-Oncol. 2023;25(Suppl 4):iv1–99. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noad149 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noad149
Perme MP, Stare J, Estève J. On Estimation in relative survival. Biometrics. 2012;68:113–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01640.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01640.x
Brenner H, Arndt V, Gefeller O, Hakulinen T. An alternative approach to age adjustment of cancer survival rates. Eur J Cancer. 2004;40:2317–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2004.07.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2004.07.007
Rutherford MJ, Dickman PW, Coviello E, Lambert PC. Estimation of age-standardized net survival, even when age-specific data are sparse. Cancer Epidemiol. 2020;67:101745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2020.101745 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2020.101745
Brenner H, Gefeller O, Hakulinen T. Period analysis for ‘up-to-date’ cancer survival data theory, empirical evaluation, computational realisation and applications. Eur J Cancer. 2004;40:326–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2003.10.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2003.10.013
Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, et al. The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131:803–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1
Walker EV, Davis FG, Yasmin F, Smith TR, Yuan Y. Incidence and survival of primary central nervous system tumors diagnosed in 4 Canadian provinces from 2010 to 2015. Neuro-Oncol Pr. 2022;10:203–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npac089 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npac089
Yabroff KR, Harlan L, Zeruto C, Abrams J, Mann B. Patterns of care and survival for patients with glioblastoma multiforme diagnosed during 2006. Neuro-Oncology. 2012;14:351–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nor218 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nor218
Dahlrot RH, Kristensen BW, Hjelmborg J, Herrstedt J, Hansen S. A population-based study of low-grade gliomas and mutated isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1). J Neuro-Oncol. 2013;114:309–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-013-1186-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-013-1186-3
Climans SA, Ramos RC, Laperriere N, Bernstein M, Mason WP. Outcomes of presumed malignant glioma treated without pathological confirmation: a retrospective, single-center analysis. Neuro-Oncol Pract. 2020;7:446–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npaa009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npaa009
Korja M, Raj R, Seppä K, et al. Glioblastoma survival is improving despite increasing incidence rates: a nationwide study between 2000 and 2013 in Finland. Neuro-Oncology. 2018;21:370–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noy164 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noy164
Mireles EEM, Skaga E, Server A, et al. The benefit of complete resection of contrast enhancing tumor in glioblastoma patients: a population-based study. Neuro-Oncol Pr. 2023;10(6):555–564. https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npad037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npad037
Brat DJ, Aldape K, Colman H, et al. cIMPACT-NOW update 3: recommended diagnostic criteria for “Diffuse astrocytic glioma, IDH-wildtype, with molecular features of glioblastoma, WHO grade IV.” Acta Neuropathol. 2018;136:805–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-018-1913-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-018-1913-0
Stupp R, Mason WP, Van den Bent MJ, et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:987–96. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa043330 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa043330
Clarsen B, Nylenna M, Klitkou ST, et al. Changes in life expectancy and disease burden in Norway, 1990–2019: an analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Public Health. 2022;7:e593–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00092-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00092-5
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Erlend Skaga, Cassia B. Trewin-Nybråten, Pitt Niehusmann, Tom Børge Johannesen, Kirsten Marienhagen, Leif Oltedal, Stephanie Schipman, Anne Jarstein Skjulsvik, Ole Solheim, Tora Skeidsvoll Solheim, Terje Sundstrøm, Einar O. Vik-Mo, Petter Brandal, Tor Ingebrigtsen
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Funding data
-
Kreftforeningen
Grant numbers 220639-2020