Preoperative staging and treatment options in T1 rectal adenocarcinoma

Authors

  • Gunnar Baatrup Department Of Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Institute of Surgical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
  • Birger H. Endreseth Department Of Surgery, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Norway; Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
  • Vidar Isaksen Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Northern Norway, Tromsø, Norway
  • Äse Kjellmo Department of Radiology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Norway
  • Kjell Magne Tveit Cancer Centre, Ullevål University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • Arild Nesbakken Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; , Sabin LH (ed) and wittenkind (ed).

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/02841860802657243

Abstract

Background. Major rectal resection for T1 rectal cancer offers more than 95% cancer specific five-year survival to patients surviving the first 30 days after surgery. A significant further improvement by development of the surgical technique may not be possible. Improvements in the total survival rate have to come from a more differentiated treatment modality, taking patient and procedure related risk factors into account. Subgroups of patients have operative mortality risks of 10% or more. Operative complications and long-term side effects after rectum resection are frequent and often severe. Results. Local treatment of T1 cancers combined with close follow-up, early salvage surgery or later radical resection of local recurrences or with chemo-radiation may lead to fewer severe complications and comparable, or even better, long-term survival. Accurate preoperative staging and careful selection of patients for local or non-operative treatment are mandatory. As preoperative staging, at present, is not sufficiently accurate, strategies for completion, salvage or rescue surgery is important, and must be accepted by the patient before local treatment for cure is initiated. Recommendations. It is recommended that polyps with low-risk T1 cancers should be treated with endoscopic snare resection in case of Haggitt's stage 1 or 2. TEM is recommended if resection margins are uncertain after snare resection for Haggitt's stage 3 and 4, and for sessile and flat, low- risk T1 cancers. Average risk patients with high-risk T1 cancers should be offered rectum resection, but old and comorbid patients with high-risk T1 cancers should be treated individually according to objective criteria as age, physical performance as well as patient's preference. All patients treated for cure with local resection or non-surgical methods should be followed closely.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2009-01-01

How to Cite

Baatrup, G. ., Endreseth, B. H. ., Isaksen, V. ., Kjellmo, Äse ., Magne Tveit, K., & Nesbakken, A. . (2009). Preoperative staging and treatment options in T1 rectal adenocarcinoma. Acta Oncologica, 48(3), 328–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/02841860802657243