Biological image-guided radiotherapy in rectal cancer: Is there a role for FMISO or FLT, next to FDG?

Authors

  • Sarah Roels Leuven Cancer Institute, Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • Pieter Slagmolen Medical Image Computing, ESAT/Radiology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Medical Imaging Center, Leuven, Belgium
  • Johan Nuyts Nuclear medicine, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • John A. Lee Center for Molecular Imaging and Experimental Radiotherapy, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
  • Dirk Loeckx Medical Image Computing, ESAT/Radiology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Medical Imaging Center, Leuven, Belgium
  • Frederik Maes Medical Image Computing, ESAT/Radiology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Medical Imaging Center, Leuven, Belgium
  • Sigrid Stroobants Nuclear medicine, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • Freddy Penninckx Abdominal Surgery, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • Karin Haustermans Leuven Cancer Institute, Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/02841860802256434

Abstract

Purpose. The purpose of this study is to investigate the use of PET/CT with fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), fluorothymidine (FLT) and fluoromisonidazole (FMISO) for radiotherapy (RT) target definition and evolution in rectal cancer. Materials and methods. PET/CT was performed before and during preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in 15 patients with resectable rectal cancer. PET signals were delineated and CT images on the different time points were non-rigidly registered. Mismatch analyses were carried out to quantify the overlap between FDG and FLT or FMISO tumour volumes (TV) and between PET TVs over time. Results. Ninety sequential PET/CT images were analyzed. The mean FDG, FLT and FMISO-PET TVs showed a tendency to shrink during preoperative CRT. On each time point, the mean FDG-PET TV was significantly larger than the FMISO-PET TV but not significantly larger than the mean FLT-PET TV. There was a mean 65% mismatch between the FMISO and FDG TVs obtained before and during CRT. FLT TVs corresponded better with the FDG TVs (25% mismatch before and 56% during CRT). During CRT, on average 61% of the mean FDG TV (7 cc) overlapped with the baseline mean TV (15.5 cc) (n=15). For FLT, the TV overlap was 49% (n=5) and for FMISO only 20% of the TV during CRT remained inside the contour at baseline (n=10). Conclusion. FDG, FLT and FMISO-PET reflect different functional characteristics that change during CRT in rectal cancer. FLT and FDG show good spatial correspondence, while FMISO seems less reliable due to the non-specific FMISO uptake in normoxic tissue and tracer diffusion through the bowel wall. FDG and FLT-PET/CT imaging seem most appropriate to integrate in preoperative RT for rectal cancer.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2008-01-01

How to Cite

Roels, S. ., Slagmolen, P. ., Nuyts, J. ., Lee, J. A. ., Loeckx, D. ., Maes, F., … Haustermans, K. . (2008). Biological image-guided radiotherapy in rectal cancer: Is there a role for FMISO or FLT, next to FDG?. Acta Oncologica, 47(7), 1237–1248. https://doi.org/10.1080/02841860802256434