Optimal treatment margins for radiotherapy of prostate cancer based on interfraction imaging

Authors

  • Marius Røthe Arnesen Department of Medical Physics, Division of Cancer Medicine and Radiotherapy, Rikshospitalet University Hospital, Montebello, N-0310, Oslo, Norway; Department of Physics, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1048 Blindern, N-0316, Oslo, Norway
  • Karsten Eilertsen Department of Medical Physics, Division of Cancer Medicine and Radiotherapy, Rikshospitalet University Hospital, Montebello, N-0310, Oslo, Norway
  • Eirik Malinen Department of Medical Physics, Division of Cancer Medicine and Radiotherapy, Rikshospitalet University Hospital, Montebello, N-0310, Oslo, Norway

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/02841860802244190

Abstract

Purpose. To present a methodology to estimate optimal treatment margins for radiotherapy of prostate cancer based on interfraction imaging. Materials and methods. Cone beam CT images of a prostate cancer patient undergoing fractionated radiotherapy were acquired at all treatment sessions. The clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk (OARs; bladder and rectum) were delineated in the images. Random sampling from the CTV-OAR library was performed in order to simulate fractionated radiotherapy including intra- and interpatient variability in setup and organ motion/deformation. For each simulated patient, four treatment fields defined by multileaf collimators were automatically generated around the planning CTV. The treatment margin (the distance from the CTV to the field border) was varied between 2.5 and 20mm. Resulting dose distributions were calculated by a convolution method. Doses to OARs were reconstructed by polynomial warping, while the CTV was assumed to be a rigid body. The equivalent uniform dose (EUD), the tumor control probability (TCP) and the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) were used to estimate the clinical effect. Patient repositioning strategies at treatment were compared. Results. The simulations produced population based EUD histograms for the CTV and the OARs. The number of patients receiving an optimal target EUD increased with increasing margins, but at the cost of an increasing number receiving a high EUD to the OARs. Calculations of the probability of complication-free tumor control and subsequent analysis gave an optimal treatment margin of about 10mm for the simulated population, if no correction strategy was undertaken. Conclusions. The current work illustrates the principle of optimal treatment margins based on interfraction imaging. Clinically applicable margins may be obtained if a large patient image database is available.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2008-01-01

How to Cite

Røthe Arnesen, M. ., Eilertsen, K. ., & Malinen, E. . (2008). Optimal treatment margins for radiotherapy of prostate cancer based on interfraction imaging. Acta Oncologica, 47(7), 1373–1381. https://doi.org/10.1080/02841860802244190