Histopathological and Cell Biological Factors of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Before and After the Introduction of Mammographic Screening

Authors

  • Ingrid Idvall From the Departments of Pathology/Cytology, University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
  • Christina Andersson From the Departments of Pathology/Cytology, University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
  • Ghita Fallenius From the Departments of Oncology, University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
  • Christian Ingvar From the Departments of Surgery, University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
  • Anita Ringberg Department of Plastic Surgery, University Hospital MAS, Malmö, Sweden
  • Carina Strand From the Departments of Oncology, University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
  • Måns Åkerman From the Departments of Pathology/Cytology, University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
  • Mårten Fernö From the Departments of Oncology, University Hospital, Lund, Sweden

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/028418601750444231

Abstract

With the introduction of mammographic screening the incidence of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has increased to 10-15% of all breast cancers. The aim of this study was to investigate whether there were any morphological and cell biological differences between DCIS detected during the pre-screening (n = 39) as opposed to the screening period (n = 120). We could not demonstrate any statistically significant differences between the pre-screening and the screening period with regard to nuclear grade, presence of necrosis, the Van Nuys classification system, growth pattern, or cell biological factors (estrogen and progesterone receptors, c-erbB-2, p53, DNA ploidy status, Ki67, and Auer classes). These findings suggest that DCIS tumors detected during the two time periods have a similar malignant potential. DCIS detected during the screening period was further divided into the prevalence period versus the period thereafter, and symptomatic versus screening-detected asymptomatic cases. More cases with diffuse growth patterns were seen during the prevalence period than after the prevalence period, and screening-detected asymptomatic DCISs were more often 15 mm or smaller in diameter than DCISs detected symptomatically.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2001-01-01

How to Cite

Idvall, I., Andersson, C., Fallenius, G., Ingvar, C., Ringberg, A., Strand, C., … Fernö, M. (2001). Histopathological and Cell Biological Factors of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Before and After the Introduction of Mammographic Screening. Acta Oncologica, 40(5), 653–659. https://doi.org/10.1080/028418601750444231