Proton therapy in adjuvant treatment of gastric cancer: Planning comparison with advanced x-ray therapy and feasibility report

Authors

  • Francesco Dionisi Proton Therapy Unit, Department of Oncology, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS), Trento, Italy; Agenzia Provinciale per la Protonterapia (ATREP), Trento, Italy
  • Stephen Avery Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
  • John N. Lukens Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
  • Xuanfeng Ding Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
  • John Kralik Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
  • Maura Kirk Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
  • Robert E. Roses Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
  • Maurizio Amichetti Proton Therapy Unit, Department of Oncology, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS), Trento, Italy; Agenzia Provinciale per la Protonterapia (ATREP), Trento, Italy
  • James M. Metz Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA
  • John P. Plastaras Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2014.912351

Abstract

Background. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy improves both overall- and relapse-free survival in patients with resected gastric cancer. However, this comes at the cost of increased treatment-related toxicity. Proton therapy (PT) has distinct dosimetric characteristics that may reduce dose to normal tissues, improving the therapeutic ratio. The purpose of this treatment planning study is to compare PT and intensity-modulated x-ray therapy (IMXT) in gastric cancer with regards to normal tissue sparing.

Material and methods. The patient population consisted of resected gastric cancer patients treated at a single institution between 2008 and 2013. Patients who had undergone 4D CT simulation were replanned to the originally delivered doses (45–54 Gy in 25–30 daily fractions) using six-field photon IMXT and 2–3-field PT (double scattering-uniform scanning techniques).

Results. Thirteen patients were eligible for the planning comparison. IMXT provided slightly higher homogeneity indices (median values 0.04 ± 0.01 vs. 0.07 ± 0.01, p = 0.03). PT resulted in significantly (p < 0.05) lower intermediate-low doses for all the normal tissues examined (small bowel V15 82 ml vs. 133 ml, liver mean doses Gy 11.9 vs. 14.4 Gy, left/right kidney mean doses 5/0.9 Gy vs. 7.8/3.1 Gy, heart mean doses 7.4 Gy vs. 9.5 Gy). The total energy deposited outside the target volume was significantly lower with PT (median integral dose 90.1 J vs. 129 J). Four patients were treated with PT: treatment was feasible and verifications scans showed that target coverage was robust.

Conclusion. PT can contribute to normal tissue sparing in the adjuvant treatment of gastric cancer, with a potential benefit in terms of compliance to treatment, acute and late toxicities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2014-10-01

How to Cite

Dionisi, F., Avery, S., Lukens, J. N., Ding, X., Kralik, J., Kirk, M., … Plastaras, J. P. (2014). Proton therapy in adjuvant treatment of gastric cancer: Planning comparison with advanced x-ray therapy and feasibility report. Acta Oncologica, 53(10), 1312–1320. https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2014.912351