Twenty Years with Monoclonal Antibodies: State of the art-Where do we go?

Authors

  • Torgny Stigbrand Department of Immunology, Umeaˇ University, Umeaˇ, Sweden
  • Anders Ullén Department of Immunology, Umeaˇ University, Umeaˇ, Sweden
  • Per Sandström Department of Immunology, Umeaˇ University, Umeaˇ, Sweden
  • Homa Mirzaie-Joniani Department of Immunology, Umeaˇ University, Umeaˇ, Sweden
  • Birgitta Sundström Department of Immunology, Umeaˇ University, Umeaˇ, Sweden
  • Berith Nilsson Department of Immunology, Umeaˇ University, Umeaˇ, Sweden
  • Rauni Rossi Norrlund Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Umeaˇ University, Umeaˇ, Sweden
  • Katrine Riklund Åhlström Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Umeaˇ University, Umeaˇ, Sweden
  • Sven-Ola Hietala Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Umeaˇ University, Umeaˇ, Sweden

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3109/02841869609101639

Abstract

In this review, we have selected some parameters with the potential to improve the efficacy of RIL and RIT. Focus has partially been on the behaviour of radiolabeled antibodies in vivo in relation to properties and amounts of both target antigen and the antibodies used. If, out of the 28 factors listed in Table 1, some should be given preference in future work, it is our opinion that after the initial saturation of the tumour site a rapid decrease in redundant antibody is of significant importance. Furthermore, quantitative aspects of both antigens and antibodies should be more carefully evaluated when possible. By combining several of the listed approaches toward increasing efficiency, a more extensive use of RIL and RIT could be expected in the future

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

1996-01-01

How to Cite

Stigbrand, T., Ullén, A., Sandström, P., Mirzaie-Joniani, H., Sundström, B., Nilsson, B., … Hietala, S.-O. (1996). Twenty Years with Monoclonal Antibodies: State of the art-Where do we go?. Acta Oncologica, 35(3), 259–265. https://doi.org/10.3109/02841869609101639