Clinical validation of atlas-based auto-segmentation of pelvic volumes and normal tissue in rectal tumors using auto-segmentation computed system

Authors

  • Maria Antonietta Gambacorta Cattedra Radioterapia, Istituto Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Policlinico Universitario ‘A. Gemelli’, Rome, Italy
  • Chiara Valentini Cattedra Radioterapia, Istituto Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Policlinico Universitario ‘A. Gemelli’, Rome, Italy
  • Nicola Dinapoli Cattedra Radioterapia, Istituto Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Policlinico Universitario ‘A. Gemelli’, Rome, Italy
  • Luca Boldrini Cattedra Radioterapia, Istituto Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Policlinico Universitario ‘A. Gemelli’, Rome, Italy
  • Nicola Caria Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, USA
  • Maria Cristina Barba Cattedra Radioterapia, Istituto Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Policlinico Universitario ‘A. Gemelli’, Rome, Italy
  • Gian Carlo Mattiucci Cattedra Radioterapia, Istituto Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Policlinico Universitario ‘A. Gemelli’, Rome, Italy
  • Danilo Pasini Cattedra Radioterapia, Istituto Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Policlinico Universitario ‘A. Gemelli’, Rome, Italy
  • Bruce Minsky MD Anderson Cancer Center, Radiation Oncology, Houston, USA
  • Vincenzo Valentini Cattedra Radioterapia, Istituto Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Policlinico Universitario ‘A. Gemelli’, Rome, Italy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2012.754989

Abstract

Purpose. To evaluate in two different settings – clinical practice and education/training – the reliability, time efficiency and the ideal sequence of an atlas-based auto-segmentation system in pelvic delineation of locally advanced rectal cancer. Methods. Fourteen consecutive patients were selected between October and December 2011. The images of four were used as an atlas and 10 used for validation. Two independent operators participated: a Delineator to contour and a Reviewer to perform an independent check (IC). The CTV, pelvic subsites and organs at risk were contoured in four different sequences. These included A: manual; B: auto-segmentation; C: auto-segmentation + manual revision; and D: manual + auto-segmentation + manual revision. Contouring was performed by the Delineator using the same planning CT. All of them underwent an IC by a Reviewer. The time required for all the contours were recorded and overlapping evaluation was assessed using a Dice coefficient. Results. In the clinical practice setting there have been 13 minutes time saved between sequences A versus sequences B (from 38 to 25 minutes, p = 0.002), a mean Dice coefficient in favor of sequences A for CTV and all subsites (p = 0.0195). In the educational/training setting there have been 35.2 minutes time saved between sequences C and D 8 (from 73.1 min to 37.9 min, p = 0.002). Conclusion. The preliminary data suggest that the use of an atlas-based auto-contouring system may help improve efficiencies in contouring in the clinical practice setting and could have a tutorial role in the educational/training setting.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2013-11-01

How to Cite

Antonietta Gambacorta, M., Valentini, C., Dinapoli, N., Boldrini, L., Caria, N., Cristina Barba, M., … Valentini, V. (2013). Clinical validation of atlas-based auto-segmentation of pelvic volumes and normal tissue in rectal tumors using auto-segmentation computed system. Acta Oncologica, 52(8), 1676–1681. https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2012.754989