Automatic delineation for replanning in nasopharynx radiotherapy: What is the agreement among experts to be considered as benchmark?

Authors

  • Gian Carlo Mattiucci Radiation Oncology Department, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
  • Luca Boldrini Radiation Oncology Department, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
  • Giuditta Chiloiro Radiation Oncology Department, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
  • Giuseppe Roberto D’Agostino Radiation Oncology Department, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
  • Silvia Chiesa Radiation Oncology Department, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
  • Fiorenza De Rose Radiation Oncology Department, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
  • Luigi Azario Institute of Physics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
  • Danilo Pasini Radiation Oncology Department, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
  • Maria Antonietta Gambacorta Radiation Oncology Department, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
  • Mario Balducci Radiation Oncology Department, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
  • Vincenzo Valentini Radiation Oncology Department, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2013.813069

Abstract

Background and purpose. Anatomic changes during head and neck radiotherapy require replanning. The primary aim of this study is the definition of the agreement among experts in the head and neck automatic delineation frame to use as benchmark. The secondary goal is to assess the reliability of automatic delineation for nasopharynx radiotherapy and time saving. Material and methods. A computed tomography (CT) scan was acquired in 10 nasopharynx patients along intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment for replanning. Deformable registration with replanning autocontouring of the structures was performed using VelocityAI 2.3© software defining Structure Set A. The optimization of these contours was obtained through revision by a skilled operator, drawing Structure Set B. An ex novo Structure Set C was segmented on the replanning CT-scan by an expert delineation team. The mean Dice's Similarity Index (mDSI) was calculated between Structure Set A and B, A and C, and between B and C for each volume. All segmentation times for organs at risk (OARs) and clinical target volume (CTV) were recorded and compared. Results. We validated the replanning autocontoured Structure Sets for 10 patients. For volumetric analysis we observed mDSI values of 0.87 for the OARs, 0.70 for nodes, 0.90 for CTV in the Structure Set A-B comparison and respectively of 0.74, 0.63 and 0.78 for the Structure Set A-C one, and 0.78, 0.78 and 0.85 for Structure Set B-C, which represents the existing expert based benchmark. We calculated a mean saved time in Structure Set B of 30 minutes. Conclusions. Autocontouring procedures offer considerable segmentation time saving with acceptable reliability of the contours, even if an independent check procedure for their optimization is still required to increase their adherence to referential benchmark gold standard among experts, which stands at a 0.80 DSI value.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2013-10-01

How to Cite

Carlo Mattiucci, G., Boldrini, L., Chiloiro, G., Roberto D’Agostino, G., Chiesa, S., De Rose, F., … Valentini, V. (2013). Automatic delineation for replanning in nasopharynx radiotherapy: What is the agreement among experts to be considered as benchmark?. Acta Oncologica, 52(7), 1417–1422. https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2013.813069