A randomised feasibility/phase II study (SBG 2004-1) with dose-dense/tailored epirubicin, cyclophoshamide (EC) followed by docetaxel (T) or fixed dosed dose-dense EC/T versus T, doxorubicin and C (TAC) in node-positive breast cancer

Authors

  • Sara Margolin Department of Oncology, Karolinska Institute and University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Nils-Olof Bengtsson Department of Oncology, Umeå University Hospital, Sweden
  • Lena Carlsson Department of Oncology, Sundsvall Hospital, Sweden
  • Per Edlund Department of Oncology, Gävle Hopsital, Sweden
  • Mats Hellstrøm Department of Oncology, Karolinska Institute and University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Per Karlsson Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
  • Elisabet Lidbrink Department of Oncology, Karolinska Institute and University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Barbro Linderholm Department of Oncology, Linkøping University Hospital, Sweden
  • Henrik Lindman Department of Oncology, Uppsala University Hospital, Sweden
  • Per Malmström Department of Oncology, Lund University Hospital, Sweden
  • Dagny Pettersson Skøld Department of Oncology, Karolinska Institute and University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Martin Søderberg Department of Oncology, Malmø University Hospital, Sweden
  • Kenneth Villman Department of Oncology, Örebro University Hospital, Sweden
  • Jonas Bergh Department of Oncology, Karolinska Institute and University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2010.535847

Abstract

The aim of the study was to evaluate the feasibility of tailored and dose-dense epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel as adjuvant breast cancer therapy. Material and methods. Patients with node-positive breast cancer received either four cycles of biweekly and tailored EC (epirubicin 38-60-75-90-105-120 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 450-600-900-1200 mg/m2) followed by four cycles of docetaxel (60-75-85-100 mg/m2) (arm A) or the same regimen with fixed doses (E90C600 + 4 → T75 + 4) (arm B) or docetaxel, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (T75A50C500) every three weeks for six cycles (arm C). All patients received G-CSF support and prophylactic ciprofloxacin. Results. One-hundred and twenty-four patients were randomised in the study. In the A, B and C arm, 17% 19% and 3% of the patients had one or more cycles delayed due to side-effects whereas 24%, 5% and 15% experienced a grade 3 infection or febrile neutropenia. After the introduction of an extra week between the EC and T parts in the A and B arms, grade 3 hand-foot-skin reactions were reduced from 5 to 0.2%. Twenty-nine percent (A and B) and 20% (C) of the patients were hospitalised due to side-effects. Discussion. Dose-dense and tailored EC/T can be given with manageable toxicity and is after adjustment presently studied in the phase III Panther trial.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2011-01-01

How to Cite

Margolin, S., Bengtsson, N.-O., Carlsson, L., Edlund, P., Hellstrøm, M., Karlsson, P., … Bergh, J. (2011). A randomised feasibility/phase II study (SBG 2004-1) with dose-dense/tailored epirubicin, cyclophoshamide (EC) followed by docetaxel (T) or fixed dosed dose-dense EC/T versus T, doxorubicin and C (TAC) in node-positive breast cancer. Acta Oncologica, 50(1), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2010.535847