Cetuximab and chemoradiation for rectal cancer–is the water getting muddy?

Authors

  • Rob Glynne-Jones Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, UK
  • Suzy Mawdsley Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, UK
  • Mark Harrison Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, UK

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3109/02841860903536010

Abstract

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor cetuximab has been successfully combined with radical radiotherapy in head and neck cancer. In colorectal cancer, increased response rates are achieved by cetuximab and panitumumab within standard chemotherapy schedules, but not in chemoradiation regimens. This review examines the clinical evidence and potential mechanisms for an interaction when EGFR inhibitors are added to fluoropyrimidine-based chemoradiation in rectal adenocarcinoma. Methods. This review was compiled by searching PubMed and Medline for English language articles published until 2009 with established search strategies, supplemented by hand searching of abstracts from the proceedings of relevant international meetings. The primary outcome measure was pathological complete response (pCR). Results. Only 13 publications and three presentations in abstract of 13 phase I/II trials of preoperative chemoradiation with cetuximab in rectal cancer were identified. A total of 316 patients were identified who received cetuximab in combination with radiotherapy and 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine preoperatively. One hundred and thirty eight of these patients received either additional irinotecan or oxaliplatin. One study with panitumumab with safety but no efficacy results was identified, and two studies with gefinitib. The pCR rate ranged from 0–20%. The overall pooled pCR for cetuximab based chemoradiation was 9.1% (29/316). The rate of G3/G4 gastrointestinal toxicity, in terms of diarrhoea, varied from 5–30%, with an overall pooled rate of 47/313 (15%). Discussion. Potential reasons for the disappointing results of EGFR inhibition with fluoropyrimidine-based preoperative chemoradiation include a less critical role of repopulation in rectal adenocarcinoma using a non-curative radiation dose; or antagonistic effects on 5FU-based chemoradiation and oxaliplatin, if some cells arrest in G1 or G2-M and fail to pass through S phase. Conclusion. Cetuximab combined with fluoropyrimidine-based chemoradiation is not currently recommended. A better understanding of the mechanisms involved in combinations of chemotherapy and radiotherapy might allow more effective future scheduling of biological and chemical agents in combination with radiation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2010-01-01

How to Cite

Glynne-Jones, R., Mawdsley, S., & Harrison, M. (2010). Cetuximab and chemoradiation for rectal cancer–is the water getting muddy?. Acta Oncologica, 49(3), 278–286. https://doi.org/10.3109/02841860903536010