Lung cancer: a nationwide analysis of sex and age incidence trends from 1980 to 2022

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2024.34876

Keywords:

lung cancer, incidence, epidemiology, female, male, incidence forecasting

Abstract

Background: Lung cancer, once rare, has evolved into the global leading cause of cancer-related mortality, primarily driven by widespread cigarette smoking in the 20th century. This study explores the historical trends of lung cancer incidence in Denmark over four decades, emphasizing the impact of smoking prevalence, age, and gender on the observed patterns.

Materials and methods: Drawing upon data from the Danish National Patient Register and information on smoking habits provided by the Danish Health Authority, this study investigates lung cancer incidence rates, demographic shifts, and smoking prevalence from 1980 to 2022.

Results: Smoking prevalence exhibited a consistent decline in males from 1950 to 2022, whereas female smoking prevalence maintained a stable level from 1950 to 1987, followed by a subsequent decline from 1987 to 2022. A peak in lung cancer crude incidence rates was identified during 2014–2017, with no significant difference observed before and after this period. Over the period, the gender distribution transitioned from a male majority to an equal male-female ratio, and age-specific disparities indicated declines in patients aged 50–59 and increases in those above 80 years.

Interpretation: The certainty of a decline in lung cancer incidence in the coming years remains unclear. Based on smoking prevalence, it might still be a decade away. To ensure a sustained decline in lung cancer incidence, targeted interventions are imperative, including customized smoking cessation programs that could be designed favorably for females. Given the modest decline in smoking prevalence over the last decade, legislation aimed at discouraging young individuals from smoking is pivotal. As of now, these efforts have not been implemented in Denmark.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Mattiuzzi C, Lippi G. Current cancer epidemiology. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2019;9(4):217.

https://doi.org/10.2991/jegh.k.191008.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/jegh.k.191008.001

Parkin DM, Pisani P, Ferlay J. Estimates of the worldwide incidence of eighteen major cancers in 1985. Int J Cancer. 1993;54(4):594–606.

https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.2910540413 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.2910540413

Giovino GA, Henningfield JE, Tomar SL, et al. Epidemiology of tobacco use and dependence. Epidemiol Rev. 1995;17(1):48–65.

https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036185 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036185

Samarasekera U. WHO’s ninth report on the global tobacco epidemic. Lancet Oncol. 2023;24(9):957.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00341-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00341-2

Funatogawa I, Funatogawa T, Yano E. Impacts of early smoking initiation: long-term trends of lung cancer mortality and smoking initiation from repeated cross-sectional surveys in Great Britain. BMJ Open. 2012;2(5):e001676.

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001676 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001676

National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (US) Office on Smoking and Health. The health consequences of smok-ing – 50 years of progress: a report of the surgeon general [Internet]. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US); 2014. (Reports of the Surgeon General). Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK179276/

Chaitanya Thandra K, Barsouk A, Saginala K, et al. Epidemiology of lung cancer. Współczesna Onkol. 2021;25(1):45–52.

https://doi.org/10.5114/wo.2021.103829 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/wo.2021.103829

Wang XR, Chiu YL, Qiu H, et al. The roles of smoking and cooking emissions in lung cancer risk among Chinese women in Hong Kong. Ann Oncol. 2009;20(4):746–51.

https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdn699 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdn699

Giaquinto AN, Miller KD, Tossas KY, et al. Cancer statistics for African American/Black People 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72(3):202–29.

https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21718 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21718

Haiman CA, Stram DO, Wilkens LR, et al. Ethnic and racial differences in the smoking-related risk of lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(4):333–42.

https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa033250 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa033250

In KH, Kwon YS, Oh IJ, et al. Lung cancer patients who are asymptomatic at diagnosis show favorable prognosis: a Korean Lung Cancer Registry Study. Lung Cancer. 2009;64(2):232–7.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2008.08.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2008.08.005

Skuladottir H, Olsen JH, Hirsch FR. Incidence of lung cancer in Denmark: historical and actual status. Lung Cancer. 2000;27(2): 107–18.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5002(99)00104-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5002(99)00104-X

Lynge E, Sandegaard JL, Rebolj M. The Danish National Patient Register. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39(7_Suppl.):30–3.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494811401482 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494811401482

Schmidt M, Schmidt SAJ, Sandegaard JL, et al. The Danish National Patient Registry: a review of content, data quality, and research po-tential. Clin Epidemiol. 2015;7:449–90.

https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S91125 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S91125

World Health Organization. (2004). ICD-10 : international statistical classification of diseases and related health problems : tenth revision, 2nd ed. World Health Organization. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/42980

Danish Health Authority. Tobaksrygning og rygestop: Konsekvenser for sundheden [Internet]. [Cited date: December 14th, 2023] Available from: https://www.sst.dk/~/media/39CD08DAD84C4727AA7408A643C3A1E0.ashx

Statistics Denmark [Internet]. [Cited date: December 14th, 2023] Available from: https://www.statistikbanken.dk/10022

Vespa J, Medina L, Armstong D. Demographic turning points for the United States: population projections for 2020 to 2060 [Internet]. [Cited date: December 14th, 2023] Available from: https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2020/demo/p25-1144.pdf

Manns A, Torregrossa H, Mahdjoub S, et al. Do determinants of smoking cessation and relapse differ between men and women? Data from a French National Study. Subst Use Misuse. 2024;59(2):167–76.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2023.2267106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2023.2267106

Kang H, Cheon E, Kim HK, et al. Vision for tobacco endgame in Korea: suggestions for countries with endgame aspirations. Tob Control. 2023:tc-2022-057691.

https://doi.org/10.1136/tc-2022-057691 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/tc-2022-057691

Engholm G, Ferlay J, Christensen N, et al. NORDCAN – a Nordic tool for cancer information, planning, quality control and research. Acta Oncol. 2010;49(5):725–36.

https://doi.org/10.3109/02841861003782017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/02841861003782017

Jafari A, Rajabi A, Gholian-Aval M, et al. National, regional, and global prevalence of cigarette smoking among women/females in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Health Prev Med. 2021;26(1):5.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12199-020-00924-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12199-020-00924-y

Becklake MR, Kauffmann F. Gender differences in airway behaviour over the human life span. Thorax. 1999;54(12):1119–38.

https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.54.12.1119 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.54.12.1119

Rasmussen M, Tønnesen H. Pregnant smokers: potential for improvement of intervention. Clin Health Promot Res Best Pract. 2015;5(3):67–73.

https://doi.org/10.29102/clinhp.150010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29102/clinhp.150010

Tominaga K, Mori K, Yokoi K, et al. Lung cancer in patients under 50 years old. Jpn J Cancer Res. 1999;90(5):490–5.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.1999.tb00774.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1349-7006.1999.tb00774.x

Veness M, Delaney G, Berry M. Lung cancer in patients aged 50 years and younger: clinical characteristics, treatment details and outcome. Aust Radiol. 1999;43(3):328–33.

https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1673.1999.433666.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1673.1999.433666.x

Suidan AM, Roisman L, Belilovski Rozenblum A, et al. Lung cancer in young patients: higher rate of driver mutations and brain involvement, but better survival. J Glob Oncol. 2019;5:1–8.

https://doi.org/10.1200/JGO.18.00216 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JGO.18.00216

O’Donovan A, Leech M. Personalised treatment for older adults with cancer: the role of frailty assessment. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2020;16:30–8.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2020.09.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2020.09.001

Leduc C, Antoni D, Charloux A, et al. Comorbidities in the management of patients with lung cancer. Eur Respir J. 2017;49(3):1601721. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01721-2016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01721-2016

Gjerstorff ML. The Danish Cancer Registry. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39(7_Suppl.):42–5.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494810393562 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494810393562

Published

2024-06-30

How to Cite

Borg, M., Tønnesen, H. ., Ibsen, R., Hilberg, O. ., & Løkke, A. . (2024). Lung cancer: a nationwide analysis of sex and age incidence trends from 1980 to 2022. Acta Oncologica, 63(1), 526–531. https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2024.34876

Issue

Section

Original article

Categories