Breast cancer hormone receptor levels and benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen in a randomized trial with long-term follow-up

Authors

  • Helena Fohlin Regional Cancer Center South-East Sweden and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4336-0949
  • Anna Nordenskjöld Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg Sweden
  • Johan Rosell Regional Cancer Center South-East Sweden and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
  • Mårten Fernö Division of Oncology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
  • Tommy Fornander Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Lisa Rydén Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Surgery, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
  • Lambert Skoog Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Bo Nordenskjöld Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
  • Olle Stål Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2024.40493

Keywords:

Breast cancer, estrogen receptor, tamoxifen, long term

Abstract

Background: Hormone receptor positivity predicts benefit from endocrine therapy but the knowledge about the long-term survival of patients with different tumor receptor levels is limited. In this study, we describe the 25 years outcome of tamoxifen (TAM) treated patients.

Patients and methods: Between 1983 and 1992, a total of 4,610 postmenopausal patients with early-stage breast cancer were randomized to receive totally 2 or 5 years of TAM therapy. After 2 years, 4,124 were alive and free of breast cancer recurrence. Among these, 2,481 had demonstrated estrogen receptor positive (ER+) disease. From 1988, the Abbot enzyme immunoassay became available and provided quantitative receptor levels for 1,210 patients, for which our analyses were done.

Results: After 5 years of follow-up, when all TAM treatment was finished, until 15 years of follow-up, breast cancer mortality for patients with ER+ disease was significantly reduced in the 5-year group as compared with the 2-year group (hazard ratios [HR] 0.67, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.55–0.83, p < 0.001). After 15 years, the difference between the groups remained but did not increase further. A substantial benefit from prolonged TAM therapy was only observed for the subgroup of patients with ER levels below the median (HR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.46–0.84, p = 0.002). Similarly, patients with progesterone receptor negative (PR-) disease did benefit from prolonged TAM treatment. For patients with progesterone receptor positive (PR+) disease, there was no statistically significant benefit from more than 2 years of TAM. 

Interpretation: As compared with 2 years of adjuvant TAM, 5 years significantly prolonged breast cancer-specific survival. The benefit from prolonged TAM therapy was statistically significant for patients with ER levels below median or PR-negative disease. There was no evident benefit from prolonged TAM for patients with high ER levels or with PR+ tumors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Randomized trial of two versus five years of adjuvant tamoxifen for postmenopausal early stage breast cancer. Swedish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996;88(21):1543–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/88.21.1543 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/88.21.1543

Ekholm M, Bendahl PO, Ferno M, Nordenskjold B, Stal O, Ryden L, et al. Effects of adjuvant tamoxifen over three decades on breast cancer-free and distant recurrence-free interval among premenopausal women with oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer randomised in the Swedish SBII:2pre trial. Eur J Cancer. 2019;110:53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2018.12.034 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2018.12.034

Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative G, Davies C, Godwin J, Gray R, Clarke M, Cutter D, et al. Relevance of breast cancer hormone receptors and other factors to the efficacy of adjuvant tamoxifen: patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet. 2011;378(9793):771–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60993-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60993-8

Nordenskjold A, Fohlin H, Fornander T, Lofdahl B, Skoog L, Stal O. Progesterone receptor positivity is a predictor of long-term benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen treatment of estrogen receptor positive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016;160(2):313–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-4007-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-4007-5

Ferno M, Bendahl PO, Brisfors A, Byman K, Ekeberg M, Ferraud L, et al. Intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility of estrogen and progesterone receptor enzyme immunoassay in breast cancer cytosol samples – a Swedish multicenter study. Swedish Society of Cancer Study Group. Acta Oncol. 1997;36(8):793–8. https://doi.org/10.3109/02841869709001359 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/02841869709001359

StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 13. Collage Station, TX: StataCorp LP; 2013.

Lindstrom LS, Yau C, Czene K, Thompson CK, Hoadley KA, Van’t Veer LJ, et al. Intratumor heterogeneity of the estrogen receptor and the long-term risk of fatal breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018;110(7):726–33. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djx270 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djx270

Noordhoek I, de Groot AF, Cohen D, Liefers GJ, Portielje JEA, Kroep JR. Higher ER load is not associated with better outcome in stage 1–3 breast cancer: a descriptive overview of quantitative HR analysis in operable breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;176(1):27–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05233-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05233-9

Viale G, Regan MM, Maiorano E, Mastropasqua MG, Dell’Orto P, Rasmussen BB, et al. Prognostic and predictive value of centrally reviewed expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors in a randomized trial comparing letrozole and tamoxifen adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal early breast cancer: BIG 1–98. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(25):3846–52. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.11.9453 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.11.9453

Bartlett JM, Brookes CL, Robson T, van de Velde CJ, Billingham LJ, Campbell FM, et al. Estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor as predictive biomarkers of response to endocrine therapy: a prospectively powered pathology study in the Tamoxifen and Exemestane Adjuvant Multinational trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(12):1531–8. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2010.30.3677 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2010.30.3677

Dowsett M, Allred C, Knox J, Quinn E, Salter J, Wale C, et al. Relationship between quantitative estrogen and progesterone receptor expression and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) status with recurrence in the Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination trial. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(7):1059–65. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.12.9437 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.12.9437

Fisher B, Jeong JH, Bryant J, Anderson S, Dignam J, Fisher ER, et al. Treatment of lymph-node-negative, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer: long-term findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project randomised clinical trials. Lancet. 2004;364(9437):858–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16981-X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16981-X

Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Tamoxifen for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 1998;351(9114):1451–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(97)11423-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(97)11423-4

Bartlett JMS, Sgroi DC, Treuner K, Zhang Y, Ahmed I, Piper T, et al. Breast Cancer Index and prediction of benefit from extended endocrine therapy in breast cancer patients treated in the Adjuvant Tamoxifen-To Offer More? (aTTom) trial. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(11):1776–83. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdz289 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdz289

Sgroi DC, Treuner K, Zhang Y, Piper T, Salunga R, Ahmed I, et al. Correlative studies of the Breast Cancer Index (HOXB13/IL17BR) and ER, PR, AR, AR/ER ratio and Ki67 for prediction of extended endocrine therapy benefit: a Trans-aTTom study. Breast Cancer Res. 2022;24(1):90. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-022-01589-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-022-01589-x

Ferno M, Stal O, Baldetorp B, Hatschek T, Kallstrom AC, Malmstrom P, et al. Results of two or five years of adjuvant tamoxifen correlated to steroid receptor and S-phase levels. South Sweden Breast Cancer Group, and South-East Sweden Breast Cancer Group. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2000;59(1):69–76. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006332423620 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006332423620

Lundgren C, Tutzauer J, Church SE, Stal O, Ekholm M, Forsare C, et al. Tamoxifen-predictive value of gene expression signatures in premenopausal breast cancer: data from the randomized SBII:2 trial. Breast Cancer Res. 2023;25(1):110. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-023-01719-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-023-01719-z

Nordenskjöld A, Dar H, Albertsson P, Fornander T, Karlsson P, Skoog L, et al. Progesterone receptor gene expression and immunohistochemistry as predictors of adjuvant tamoxifen benifit in estrogen receptor positive breast cancer. In: Nordenskjöld A, editor. To predict results of breast cancer therapy. PhD thesis. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg; 2019, p. 1–12.

Rosell J, Nordenskjold B, Bengtsson NO, Fornander T, Hatschek T, Lindman H, et al. Long-term effects on the incidence of second primary cancers in a randomized trial of two and five years of adjuvant tamoxifen. Acta Oncol. 2017;56(4):614–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2016.1273547 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2016.1273547

Nordenskjold A, Fohlin H, Rosell J, Bengtsson NO, Fornander T, Hatschek T, et al. Breast cancer survival and incidence of second primary cancers after 30 years in a randomized study of two versus five years of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy. Breast. 2023;71:63–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2023.07.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2023.07.010

Condorelli R, Vaz-Luis I. Managing side effects in adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2018;18(11):1101–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2018.1520096 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2018.1520096

Curigliano G, Burstein HJ, Gnant M, Loibl S, Cameron D, Regan MM, et al. Understanding breast cancer complexity to improve patient outcomes: the St Gallen International Consensus Conference for the Primary Therapy of Individuals with Early Breast Cancer 2023. Ann Oncol. 2023;34(11):970–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2023.08.017

Gray RG, Rea D, Handley K, Browden SJ, Perry P, Earl HM, et al. aTTom: long-term effects of continuing adjuvant tamoxifen to 10 years versus stopping at 5 years in 6,953 women with early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(18):5. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2013.31.18_suppl.5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2013.31.18_suppl.5

Davies C, Pan H, Godwin J, Gray R, Arriagada R, Raina V, et al. Long-term effects of continuing adjuvant tamoxifen to 10 years versus stopping at 5 years after diagnosis of oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: ATLAS, a randomised trial. Lancet. 2013;381(9869):805–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61963-1

Ekholm M, Bendahl PO, Ferno M, Nordenskjold B, Stal O, Ryden L. Two years of adjuvant tamoxifen provides a survival benefit compared with no systemic treatment in premenopausal patients with primary breast cancer: long-term follow-up (> 25 years) of the Phase III SBII: 2pre trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(19):2232–8. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.65.6272 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.65.6272

Published

2024-07-05

How to Cite

Fohlin, H., Nordenskjöld, A., Rosell, J., Fernö, M., Fornander, T., Rydén, L., Skoog, L., Nordenskjöld, B., & Stål, O. (2024). Breast cancer hormone receptor levels and benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen in a randomized trial with long-term follow-up. Acta Oncologica, 63(1), 535–541. https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2024.40493