Impact of emergency computed tomography on treatment and time to treatment for renal colic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/sju.v60.42593Keywords:
Urolithiasis, acute renal colic, emergency medicine, urology, computed tomography, URS, ESWL, PCNLIntroductionAbstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the utilization and impact of emergency computed tomography (CT) on the management of renal colic, focusing on treatment decisions, time to treatment and the subsequent need for additional emergency department (ED) visits.
Materials and methods: Retrospective analysis of patient visits to the ED in Helsingborg with a diagnosis of urolithiasis (ICD codes N20-23) between July 1, 2019 and June 30, 2020.
Results: Out of 64,263 visits, 1.4% (880) visits were related to urolithiasis, involving 612 patients. Emergency CT (within 24 h) was performed in 43% of the cases, with an additional 9% undergoing CT at a subsequent emergency visit. Radiological confirmation of kidney or ureteral stone was found in 324 patients, of which 63% (204) required no treatment. Comparison between patients who underwent emergency CT and those who did not, revealed a significantly shorter time to treatment and closure in the emergency CT group. The median time to treatment was 28 days for those with an emergency CT and 59 days for those without (P < 0.001), acute surgery excluded. The median time to closure was 31 days for emergency CT compared to 37 days without emergency CT (P < 0.010), acute surgery excluded.
Conclusion: In this study, the use of emergency CT shortened the time to treatment and rendered the patient stone free earlier compared to deferred diagnostics, with a note of caution that emergency CT may have led to increased surgical treatments for stones that might otherwise have passed spontaneously.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT06535711
Downloads
References
Socialstyrelsen, Socialstyrelsen registerservice, statistik och data. https://sdb.socialstyrelsen.se/if_par/val.aspx.
Hesse A, Brändle E, Wilbert D, et al. Study on the prevalence and incidence of urolithiasis in Germany comparing the years 1979 vs. 2000. Eur Urol. 2003;44(6):709–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0302-2838(03)00415-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0302-2838(03)00415-9
Ljunghall S. Incidence and natural history of renal stone disease and its relationship to calcium metabolism. Eur Urol. 1978;4(6):424–430. https://doi.org/10.1159/000474013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000474013
Trinchieri A. Epidemiology of urolithiasis: an update. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2008;5(2):101–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12018-009-9025-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12018-009-9025-y
Ferraro PM, Curhan GC, D’Addessi A, et al. Risk of recurrence of idiopathic calcium kidney stones: analysis of data from the literature. J Nephrol. 2017;30(2):227–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-016-0283-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-016-0283-8
Jendeberg J, Geijer H, Alshamari M, et al. Size matters: the width and location of a ureteral stone accurately predict the chance of spontaneous passage. Eur Radiol. 2017;27(11):4775–4785. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-4852-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-4852-6
Yallappa S, Amer T, Jones P,et al. Natural history of conservatively managed ureteral stones: analysis of 6600 patients. J Endourol. 2018;32(5):371–379. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2017.0848 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2017.0848
Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, et al. EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol. 2016;69(3):475–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.041
Ray AA, Ghiculete D, Pace KT, et al. Limitations to ultrasound in the detection and measurement of urinary tract calculi. Urology. 2010;76(2):295–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2009.12.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2009.12.015
Xiang H, Chan M, Brown V, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of low-dose computed tomography of the kidneys, ureters and bladder for urolithiasis. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2017;61(5):582–590. https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.12587 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.12587
Arcaniolo D, De Sio M, Rassweiler J, et al. Emergent versus delayed lithotripsy for obstructing ureteral stones: a cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Urolithiasis. 2017;45(6):563–572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-017-0960-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-017-0960-7
Cornelius J, Zumbühl D, Afferi L, et al. Immediate shockwave lithotripsy vs delayed shockwave lithotripsy after urgent ureteral stenting in patients with ureteral or pyeloureteral urolithiasis: a matched-pair analysis. J Endourol. 2021;35(5):721–727. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.0384 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.0384
Nationellt vårdprogram för stensjukdom i övre urinvägar 2022. https://vardpersonal.1177.se/globalassets/nkk/nationell/media/dokument/kunskapsstod/vardprogram/nationellt-vardprogram-for-stensjukdom-ovre-urinvagarna.pdf
Svensk uroradiologisk förening, Mätning av urinvägskonkrement, Version 1.0/2021-05-10. 2021. https://slf.se/sfmr/surf/rekommendationer-och-riktlinjer/metodbocker/
Lindqvist K, Hellström M, Holmberg G, et al. Immediate versus deferred radiological investigation after acute renal colic: a prospective randomized study. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2006;40(2):119–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365590600688203 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00365590600688203
Croppi E, Ferraro PM, Taddei L, et al. Prevalence of renal stones in an Italian urban population: a general practice-based study. Urol Res. 2012;40(5):517–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-012-0477-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-012-0477-z
Byrne MHV, Georgiades F, Light A, et al. Impact of Covid-19-19 on the management and outcomes of ureteric stones in the UK: a multicentre retrospective study. BJU Int. 2023;131(1):82–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15882 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15882
Kaczmarek K, Kalembkiewicz J, Jankowska M, et al. Did the Covid-19-19 pandemic restrict access to emergency urological services: Assessment of reorganisation effectiveness for hospital treatment. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043735 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043735
Nourian A, Uppaluri C, Chen M, et al. Comparison of management and outcomes of symptomatic urolithiasis during the Covid-19-19 pandemic to a comparative cohort. Urology. 2022;165:178–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2022.01.019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2022.01.019
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Maria Utter, Fredrik Altmark, Marcin Popiolek, Andreas Forsvall, Karl-Johan Lundström, Tomas Thiel, Magnus Wagenius
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As from Volume 59 (2024) all published articles, unless otherwise specified, are published under CC-BY licences, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, with the condition of proper attribution to the original work.
