Quadratus lumborum block is feasible alternative to epidural block for postoperative analgesia after open radical cystectomy: surgical and oncological outcomes of a randomised clinical trial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/sju.v60.43105Keywords:
Bladder cancer, radical cystectomy, epidural analgesia, quadratum lumborum blockAbstract
Objective: The current lack of standardised perioperative pain management protocols for open radical cystectomy (ORC) underscores the need for alternative approaches to the longstanding tradition of epidural block. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of bilateral single injection quadratum lumborum block (QLB) on patients’ recovery and complication rates compared with epidural analgesia after ORC in a single-centre, randomised, parallel-group trial including adult patients with bladder cancer.
Material and methods: Consecutive ORC patients were randomly allocated into QLB and the epidural group. The primary endpoint of this study was related to opioid consumption, and the results have been published earlier. This report focuses on secondary outcomes.
Results: This study included a total of 41 patients, with 20 patients in the QLB group and 21 patients in the epidural group. Finally, 39 patients were included in the analysis.
There was a trend for more frequent need for postoperative norepinephrine and fluid support in the epidural group but without statistical significance. Postoperative complication rate was similar. Two patients in the epidural group compared to none in the QLB group were rehospitalised within 30 and 90 days. Mortality rate within 90 days was higher in the epidural group (4 vs. 0 patients, P = 0.064).
Conclusions: In this trial, there were no significant differences in surgical and oncological outcomes after ORC when QLB is compared with epidural block for postoperative analgesia.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03328988
Downloads
References
Witjes JA, Babjuk M, Horwich A, et al. EAU-ESMO consensus statements on the management of advanced and variant bladder cancer – an international collaborative Multistakeholder effort†: Under the auspices of the EAU-ESMO guidelines committees. Eur Urol. 2020;77(2):223–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.09.035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.09.035
Shabsigh A, Korets R, Donat SM, et al. Defining early morbidity of radical cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer using a standardized reporting methodology. Eur Urol. 2009;55(1):164–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2008.07.031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2008.07.031
Matulewicz RS, Brennan J, Meeks JJ, et al. Radical cystectomy perioperative care redesign. Urology. 2015;86(6):1076–1086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2015.09.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2015.09.001
Pang KH, Groves R, Catto JWF, et al. Prospective implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols to radical cystectomy. Eur Urol. 2018;73(3):363–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.07.031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.07.031
Lohsiriwat V. Enhanced recovery after surgery vs conventional care in emergency colorectal surgery. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(38):13950. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i38.13950 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i38.13950
Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Lobo DM, et al. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutr. 2010;29(4):434–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2010.01.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2010.01.004
Feldheiser A, Aziz O, Carli F, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for gastrointestinal surgery, part 2: consensus statement for anaesthesia practice. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2016;60(3):289–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.12651 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.12651
Scott MJ, Baldini G, Carli F, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for gastrointestinal surgery, part 1: pathophysiological considerations. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015;59(10):1212–1231. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.12601 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.12601
Block BM, Liu SS, Wu CL, et al. Efficacy of postoperative epidural analgesia: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2003;290(18):2455. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.290.18.2455 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.290.18.2455
Pöpping DM, Elia N, Tramer MR, et al. Impact of epidural analgesia on mortality and morbidity after surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg. 2014;259(6):1056–1067. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000237 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000237
Ahlers O, Nachtigall I, Keh D, et al. Intraoperative thoracic epidural anaesthesia attenuates stress-induced immunosuppression in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101(6):781–787. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aen287 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aen287
Freise H, Van Aken HK. Risks and benefits of thoracic epidural anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2011;107(6):859–868. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aer339 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aer339
Daneshmand S, Ahmadi H, Djaladat H, et al. Enhanced recovery protocol after radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer. J Urol. 2014;192(1):50–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.01.097 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.01.097
Weiss R, Pöpping DM. Is epidural analgesia still a viable option for enhanced recovery after abdominal surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2018;31(5):622–629. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000000640 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000000640
Freise H, Fischer LG. Intestinal effects of thoracic epidural anesthesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009;22(5):644–648. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0b013e32832eb7e8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0b013e32832eb7e8
Rodgers A, Walker N, MacMahon S, et al. Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials. BMJ. 2000;321(7275):1493. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.321.7275.1493 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.321.7275.1493
Pöpping DM, Elia N, Tramer MR, et al. Protective effects of epidural analgesia on pulmonary complications after abdominal and thoracic surgery: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg Chic Ill 1960. 2008;143(10):990–909; discussion 1000. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.143.10.990 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.143.10.990
Miller BL, Abel EJ, Richards KA, et al. Trends in epidural anesthesia use at the time of radical cystectomy and its association with perioperative and survival outcomes: a population-based analysis. Am J Clin Exp Urol. 2020;8(1):28–37.
Korgvee A, Junttila E, Kalliomaki M-L, et al. Ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block for postoperative analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2020;38(2):115–129. https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000001368 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000001368
Korgvee A, Veskimae E, Kalliomaki M-L, et al. Posterior quadratus lumborum block versus epidural analgesia for postoperative pain management after open radical cystectomy: a randomized clinical trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2022;67(3):347–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14188 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14188
Moher D, Hopewell S, Altman DG, et al. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Int J Surg Lond Engl. 2012;10(1):28–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.10.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.10.001
Liedberg F, Hagberg O, Jerlström T, et al. Cystectomy for bladder cancer in Sweden – short-term outcomes after centralization. Scand J Urol. 2024;59:84–89. https://doi.org/10.2340/sju.v59.40120 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/sju.v59.40120
Williams SB, Cumberbatch MGK, Daneshmand S, et al. Reporting radical cystectomy outcomes following implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2020;78(5):719–730. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.06.039
Rahman SN, Cao DJ, Winer AG, et al. Impact of neuraxial analgesia on outcomes following radical cystectomy: a systematic review. Urol Oncol Semin Orig Investig. 2021;39(2):100–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.10.073 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.10.073
Matulewicz RS, Patel M, Meeks JJ, et al. Transversus abdominis plane blockade as part of a multimodal postoperative analgesia plan in patients undergoing radical cystectomy. Bladder Cancer Amst Neth. 2018;4(2):161–167. https://doi.org/10.3233/BLC-170157 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/BLC-170157
Burkhard JP, Jardot F, Wuethrich PY, et al. Opioid-free anesthesia for open radical cystectomy is feasible and accelerates return of bowel function: a matched cohort study. J Clin Med. 2023;12(11):3657. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12113657 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12113657
Froehner M, Brausi MA, Studer UE, et al. Complications following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in the elderly. Eur Urol. 2009;56(3):443–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2009.05.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2009.05.008
Arslan-Carlon V, Tan KS, Donat SM, et al. Goal-directed versus standard fluid therapy to decrease ileus after open radical cystectomy. Anesthesiology. 2020;133(2):293–303. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000003367 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000003367
Calvo-Vecino JM, Ripollés-Melchor J, De Lis SA, et al. Effect of goal-directed haemodynamic therapy on postoperative complications in low–moderate risk surgical patients: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (FEDORA trial). Br J Anaesth. 2018;120(4):734–744. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2017.12.018
Wuethrich PY, Burkhard FC, Studer UE, et al. Restrictive deferred hydration combined with preemptive norepinephrine infusion during radical cystectomy reduces postoperative complications and hospitalization time. Anesthesiology. 2014;120(2):365–377. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182a44440 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182a44440
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Erik Veskimäe, Andrus Korgvee, Heini Huhtala, Heikki Koskinen, Maija-Liisa Kalliomaki, Teuvo Tammela, Eija Junttila
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As from Volume 59 (2024) all published articles, unless otherwise specified, are published under CC-BY license, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, with the condition of proper attribution to the original work.
