Paediatric stone treatment in the Nordic countries – a multicentre study from the Scandinavian Collaboration Group for Urinary Stones
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/sju.v61.46270Keywords:
Paediatric stone treatment, urolithiasis, intervention, ureteroscopy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsyAbstract
Objective: To explore differences and similarities in paediatric stone treatment between hospitals in the Nordic countries.
Material and methods: A retrospective review of the medical records was performed for children receiving stone treatment in nine Nordic hospitals between January 2014 and December 2023. Variables of interest included diagnostic imaging, treatment modalities, complication rates and stone free rates (SFR).
Results: Five hundred and sixty two treatments among 319 children were included; 117 girls and 202 boys with a median age of 10 years (interquartile range 5 – 14). Preoperative diagnostic imaging with computed tomography was performed in 442 cases (79%), and 120 patients (21%) were diagnosed with ultrasound, MRI or X-ray. In 150 cases (27%), stones treated were located in the ureter only and in 412 cases (73%) in the renal pelvis ± ureter. Ureteroscopic stone treatment (URS) was performed in 248 (44%), shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) in 242 (43%) and percutaneous lithotripsy (PCNL) in 72 cases (13%). The distribution of treatment modalities varied considerably between hospitals. URS treatments increased, and SWL procedures declined throughout the study period. A follow-up consultation was carried out in 505 cases (90%). Overall SFR after each session across treatment modalities and location was 49%. The SFRs after URS was 68%, SWL 30% and PCNL 61% and significantly higher after URS compared to SWL, p < 0.001. Postoperative complications leading to readmission occurred in 10% of patients.
Conclusion: The study reveals differences in preferred treatment modalities and results between the hospitals. Standardising diagnostics, treatment and follow-up could improve outcomes for children with kidney stone disease.
Downloads
References
Lang J, Narendrula A, El-Zawahry A, et al. Global trends in incidence and burden of urolithiasis from 1990 to 2019: an analysis of global burden of disease study data. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022;35:37–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2021.10.008
Dwyer ME, Krambeck AE, Bergstralh EJ, et al. Temporal trends in incidence of kidney stones among children: a 25-year population based study. J Urol. 2012;188(1):247–252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.03.021
Skolarikos A, Jung H, Neisius A, et al. EAU guidelines on urolithiasis [Internet]. Edn. presented at the EAU Annual Congress Madrid 2025: EAU Guidelines Office, Arnhem, the Netherlands; 2025 [cited 2026 Feb 1] Available from: http://uroweb.org/guidelines/compilations-of-all-guidelines
Soltani MH, Karimi A, Salimi M, et al. Feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of adult-sized instruments in pediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Urol. 2022;18(3):303–310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.04.014
Tejwani R, Wang HH, Wolf S, et al. Outcomes of shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for treatment of pediatric urolithiasis. J Urol. 2016;196(1):196–201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.2975
Sen H, Seckiner I, Bayrak O, et al. Treatment alternatives for urinary system stone disease in preschool aged children: results of 616 cases. J Pediatr Urol. 2015;11(1):34.e1–e5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.11.010
Marchetti KA, Lee T, Raja N, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for management of pediatric nephrolithiasis in upper urinary tract stones: multi-institutional outcomes of efficacy and morbidity. J Pediatr Urol. 2019;15(5):516.e1–e8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2019.06.006
Ellison JS, Chu DI, Nelson CP, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs ureteroscopy for kidney stones in children. JAMA Netw Open. 2025;8(6):e2516749. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.16749
Juliebø-Jones P, Æsøy M, Gjengstø P, et al. Ureteroscopy for stone disease in the paediatric population: lessons learned and outcomes in a Nordic setting. Ther Adv Urol. 2022;14:17562872221118727. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17562872221118727
Tasian GE, Copelovitch L. Evaluation and medical management of kidney stones in children. J Urol. 2014;192(5):1329–1336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.04.108
Kluner C, Hein PA, Gralla O, et al. Does ultra-low-dose CT with a radiation dose equivalent to that of KUB suffice to detect renal and ureteral calculi? J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2006;30(1):44–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.rct.0000191685.58838.ef
Roberson NP, Dillman JR, O’Hara SM, et al. Comparison of ultrasound versus computed tomography for the detection of kidney stones in the pediatric population: a clinical effectiveness study. Pediatr Radiol. 2018;48(7):962–972. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-018-4099-7
Juliebo-Jones P, Gjengsto P, Æsøy MS, et al. National trends in hospital encounters, outpatient consultations and surgeries for urolithiasis in Norway. Scand J Urol. 2025;60:244–249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/sju.v60.45214
Geraghty RM, Jones P, Somani BK. Worldwide trends of urinary stone disease treatment over the last two decades: a systematic review. J Endourol. 2017;31(6):547–556. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0895
Bach C, Zaman F, Kachrilas S, et al. Drugs for pain management in shock wave lithotripsy. Pain Res Treat. 2011;2011:259426. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/259426
Browne C, Redmond E, Kelly T, et al. Strategies to maximise patient comfort during extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy – a randomised controlled trial. Surgeon. 2021;19(4):207–211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2020.07.002
Guven S, Basiri A, Varshney AK, et al. Examining pediatric cases from the clinical research office of the endourological society ureteroscopy global study. Urology. 2017;101:31–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2016.11.020
Kahraman O, Dogan HS, Asci A, et al. Factors associated with the stone-free status after retrograde intrarenal surgery in children. Int J Clin Pract. 2021;75(10):e14667. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.14667
Gokce MI, Telli O, Akinci A, et al. Effect of prestenting on success and complication rates of ureterorenoscopy in pediatric population. J Endourol. 2016;30(8):850–855. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0201
Ishii H, Griffin S, Somani BK. Ureteroscopy for stone disease in the paediatric population: a systematic review. BJU Int. 2015;115(6): 867–873. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12927
Bani Irshid BA, Mohamed T, Deameh MG, et al. The effect of preoperative ureteral stenting on the outcomes and complications of pediatric ureteroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Urol. 2025;21(4):844–854. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2025.04.012
Armitage JN, Withington J, Fowler S, et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy access by urologist or interventional radiologist: practice and outcomes in the UK. BJU Int. 2017;119(6):913–918. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13817
Chatzikrachtis N, Tzelves L, Geraghty R, et al. Complication rate after pediatric shock wave lithotripsy according to Clavien-Dindo grading system: results from a systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing literature. World J Urol. 2023;41(3):829–835. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04267-x
Mosquera L, Pietropaolo A, Madarriaga YQ, et al. Is flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy the new gold standard for pediatric lower pole stones? Outcomes from two large European Tertiary Pediatric Endourology Centers. J Endourol. 2021;35(10):1479–1482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.1123
Ulvik Ø, Harneshaug J, Gjengstø P. What do we mean by ‘stone free’, and how accurate are urologists in predicting stone-free status following ureteroscopy? J Endourol. 2021;35(7):961–966. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.0933
Lu P, Wang Z, Song R, et al. The clinical efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in pediatric urolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2015;43(3):199–206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-015-0757-5
Kaygisiz O, Cicek MC, Mert A, et al. Which frequency is better for pediatric shock wave lithotripsy? Intermediate or low: a prospective randomized study. World J Urol. 2021;39(10):3963–3969. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03696-4
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Øyvind Ulvik, Line Vigrestad, Dan Helgø, Stein Øverby, Kristian Stritesky Larssen, Pertti Nurminen, Jóhann Páll Ingimarsson, John Åkerlund, Rita Ferrito, Tomas Thiel
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As from Volume 59 (2024) all published articles, unless otherwise specified, are published under CC-BY license, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, with the condition of proper attribution to the original work.
