Burnout among urologists and urology trainees in Denmark
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/sju.v61.47103Keywords:
Burnout, copenhagen burnout inventory, danish psychosocial work environment questionnaire, urologyAbstract
Objective: Limited information exists on burnout among European urologists and urology trainees. This study aimed to explore prevalence of burnout and identify related workplace characteristics among practicing urologists and urology trainees in Denmark.
Material and methods: In April 2025, we conducted an anonymous nation-wide online survey of urologists and urology trainees working in a public healthcare department of Urology in Denmark. Burnout and psychosocial work environment factors were evaluated using validated assessment tools.
Results: Of the 297 participants invited, 73% (n = 216) completed the survey. Respondents had a mean age of 45.8 years (standard deviation [SD] ± 10.8), 52% (n = 113) were women, and 70% (n = 152) were specialists. Personal burnout was the most prevalent domain, affecting 80.1% (n = 173) of respondents, including 47.7% (n = 103) with mild, 29.6% (n = 64) with moderate, and 2.8% (n = 6) with severe burnout. Personal burnout scores varied significantly by position (p = 0.035) and speciality tenure (p = 0.008). Psychosocial work environment factors differed across groups and departments. Strongest associations with burnout were observed for ‘possibilities for performing work tasks’, ‘emotional demands’, and ‘unnecessary work tasks’, with a notable link between work-related burnout and ‘influence at work’, alongside factors related to job demands and interpersonal relations. Female respondents reported higher personal (p = 0.003) and work-related (p = 0.011) burnout scores.
Conclusions: Thirty-two percent of urologists and urology trainees in Denmark experience moderate to severe burnout, linked to psychosocial work conditions. These findings highlight the need to engage in dialogue around work-life expectations, workplace-focused prevention strategies to support career longevity, and ensure a stable workforce capable of delivering safe, high-quality patient care.
Downloads
References
Shanafelt TD, Balch CM, Bechamps G, et al. Burnout and medical errors among American surgeons. Ann Surg. 2010;251(6):995–1000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181bfdab3
Al-Ghunaim TA, Johnson J, Biyani CS, et al. Surgeon burnout, impact on patient safety and professionalism: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg. 2022;224(1 Pt A):228–238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.12.027
Nauheim J, North AC. An updated review on physician burnout in urology. Urol Clin North Am. 2021;48(2):173–178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2021.01.003
World Health Organization. Burn-out an “occupational phenomenon”: International Classification of Diseases. 28 May 2019. [cited 2026 Oct 27]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news/item/28-05-2019-burn-out-an-occupational-phenomenon-nternational-classification-of-diseases
Shanafelt TD, Hasan O, Dyrbye LN, et al. Changes in burnout and satisfaction with work-ife balance in physicians and the general US working population between 2011 and 2014. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90(12):1600–1613. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.08.023
Harris A, North A, Bowman M, et al. Joy in work: burnout as a threat to quality in urologic care. American Urological Association; 2026. Available from: https://www.auanet.org/guidelines-and-quality/quality-and-measurement/quality-mprovement/clinical-consensus-statement-and-quality-improvement-issue-brief-(ccs-and-qiib)/joy-in-work-burnout-as-a-threat-to-quality-in-urologic-care
Pang KH, Webb TE, Esperto F, et al. Is urologist burnout different on the other side of the pond? A European perspective. Can Urol Assoc J. 2021;15(6 Suppl 1):S25–S30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.7227
acobsen FM, Jensen CFS, Schmidt MLK, et al. Burnout among urologists from Denmark and Michigan. Urology. 2021;147:68–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.07.066
Kristensen TS, Hannerz H, Høgh A, et al. The Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire – a tool for the assessment and improvement of the psychosocial work environment. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2005;31(6):438–449. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.948
Clausen T, Madsen IE, Christensen KB, et al. The Danish Psychosocial Work Environment Questionnaire (DPQ): development, content, reliability and validity. Scand Work Environ Health. 2019;45(4):356–369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3793
Medilife [Internet]. [cited 2026 Oct 27]. Available from: https://www.medilife.dk/
Franc-Guimond J, McNeil B, Schlossberg SM, et al. Urologist burnout: frequency, causes, and potential solutions to an unspoken entity. Can Urol Assoc J. 2018;12(4):137–142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.4668
Møller CM, Clausen T, Aust B, et al. A cross-sectional national study of burnout and psychosocial work environment in vascular surgery in Denmark. J Vasc Surg. 2022;75(5):1750.e3–1759.e3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2021.11.042
Dyrbye LN, Varkey P, Boone SL, et al. Physician satisfaction and burnout at different career stages. Mayo Clin Proc. 2013;88(12):1358–1367. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.07.016
Narang G, Wymer K, Mi L, et al. Personality traits and burnout: a survey of practicing US urologists. Urology. 2022;167:43–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2022.03.004
Shanafelt TD, Gorringe G, Menaker R, et al. Impact of organizational leadership on physician burnout and satisfaction. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90(4):432–440. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.01.012
West CP, Dyrbye LN, Erwin PJ, et al. Interventions to prevent and reduce physician burnout: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2016;388(10057):2272–2281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31279-X
Artz B, Kaya I, Kaya O. Gender role perspectives and job burnout. Rev Econ Househ. 2022;20(2):447–470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-021-09579-2
Lyubarova R, Salman L, Rittenberg E. Gender differences in physician burnout: driving factors and potential solutions. Perm J. 2023;27(2):130–136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/23.023
O’Kelly F, Manecksha RP, Quinlan DM, et al. Rates of self-reported ‘burnout’ and causative factors amongst urologists in Ireland and the UK: a comparative cross-sectional study. BJU Int. 2016;117(2):363–372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13218
Hu YY, Ellis RJ, Hewitt DB, et al. Discrimination, abuse, harassment, and burnout in surgical residency training. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(18):1741–1752. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1903759
Shanafelt TD, Dyrbye LN, Sinsky C, et al. Sex-specific risks of occupational distress in physicians compared with the general population. JAMA Netw Open. 2025;8(10):e2540060. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.40060
Marshall AL, Dyrbye LN, Shanafelt TD, et al. Disparities in burnout and satisfaction with work-life integration in U.S. physicians by gender and practice setting. Acad Med. 2020;95(9):1435–1443. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003521
Lu PW, Columbus AB, Fields AC, et al. Gender differences in surgeon burnout and barriers to career satisfaction: a qualitative exploration. J Surg Res. 2020;247:28–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2019.10.045
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mia Gebauer Madsen, Sara Tolouee, Linea Blichert-Refsgaard, Jakob Kristian Jakobsen, Mikkel Fode, Cecilie Markvard Møller
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
As from Volume 59 (2024) all published articles, unless otherwise specified, are published under CC-BY license, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, with the condition of proper attribution to the original work.
