A comparison of two methods for segmentation of functional volumes in radiotherapy planning of lung cancer patients

Authors

  • T. B. Nyeng Department of Oncology, Section for Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
  • D. S. Møller Department of Oncology, Section for Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
  • K. Farr Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
  • S. Kramer Department of Nuclear Medicine & PET-Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
  • A. A. Khalil Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
  • C. Grau Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
  • L. Hoffmann Department of Oncology, Section for Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2021.1877811

Keywords:

Functional imaging, radiotherapy, lung cancer, pneumonitis

Abstract

Background

In radiotherapy (RT) of lung cancer, dose to functional lung (FL) volumes segmented with two different methods (perfusion SPECT (Q-SPECT) and 4D-CT (4D) ventilation (V)) have been shown to correlate with the incidence of radiation pneumonitis (RP). This study aims to compare the FL volumes identified by both methods.

Material and methods

Thirty lung cancer patients had a 4D and Q-SPECT prior to treatment. Seventeen of these patients also had a ventilation SPECT (V-SPECT). FL sub-volumes were segmented automatically, using cut-off values. The volumes were compared in terms of overlap fraction (OF) relative to the minimal volume, and intersection fraction (IF) of the FL volume relative to the total lung volume (VLung).

Results

Cut-off values suggested in literature for Q-SPECT and 4D-V resulted in volumes differing in size by a median 18% [6%;31%], and a median OF and IF of 0.48 [0.23;0.70] and 0.09 [0.02;0.25], respectively. Segmenting volumes of comparable size of about 1/3 of VLung (FL-m(1/3), m = method) resulted in a median OF and IF of 0.43 [0.23;0.58] and 0.12 [0.06;0.19], respectively. Twenty-five patients (83%) had a reasonable overlap between FL-Q(1/3) and FL-4D-V(1/3) volumes, with OF values above 0.33. IF increased significantly (p = .036) compared to using fixed cut-off values. Similarly, volumes of comparable size of about 1/3 VLung were produced for V-SPECT, and FL-Q(1/3), FL-V(1/3), and FL-4D-V(1/3) were compared. The overlaps and intersections of FL-V(1/3) with FL-Q(1/3) volumes were significantly (p<.001) larger than the corresponding overlaps and intersections of FL-Q(1/3) with FL-4D(1/3) and FL-V(1/3) with FL-4D(1/3).

Conclusion

The Q-SPECT and 4D-V methods do not segment entirely the same FL volumes. A reasonable overlap of the volumes along with the findings of other studies that both correlate to RP incidence, suggests that a combination of both volumes, e.g. using the IF, may be useful in RT treatment planning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2021-04-03

How to Cite

Nyeng, T. B., Møller, D. S., Farr, K., Kramer, S., Khalil, A. A., Grau, C., & Hoffmann, L. (2021). A comparison of two methods for segmentation of functional volumes in radiotherapy planning of lung cancer patients. Acta Oncologica, 60(3), 353–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2021.1877811