Anatomically robust proton therapy using multiple planning computed tomography scans for locally advanced prostate cancer

Authors

  • Kia Busch Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
  • Benjamin Dahl Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
  • Stine E. Petersen Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
  • Heidi S. Rønde Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
  • Lise Bentzen Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
  • Sara Pilskog Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
  • Ludvig P. Muren Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2021.1892181

Keywords:

Anatomical robust proton therapy, treatment planning, multiple CTs, prostate cancer, patient-specific targets

Abstract

Background

Proton therapy (PT) is sensitive towards anatomical changes that may occur during a treatment course. The aim of this study was to investigate if anatomically robust PT (ARPT) plans incorporating patient-specific target motion improved target coverage while still sparing normal tissues, when applied on locally advanced prostate cancer patients where pelvic irradiation is indicated.

Material and methods

A planning computed tomography (CT) scan used for dose calculation and two additional CTs (acquired on different days) were used to make patient-specific targets for the ARPT plans on the eight included patients. The plans were compared to a conventional robust PT plan and a volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) photon plan, which were derived from the planning CT (pCT). Worst-case robust optimisation was used for all proton plans with a setup uncertainty of 5 mm and a range uncertainty of 3.5%. Target coverage (V95% and D95%) and normal tissue doses (V5–75 Gy) were evaluated on 6–8 rCTs per patient.

Results

The ARPT plans improved the prostate target coverage for the most challenging patient compared to conventional robust PT plans (20% point increase for V95% and 31 Gy increase for D95%). Across the whole cohort the estimated mean value for V95% was 97% for the ARPT plans and 95% for the conventional robust PT plans. The ARPT plans had a slight, statistically insignificant increase in normal tissue doses compared to the conventional robust proton plans. Compared to VMAT, the ARPT plans significantly reduced the normal tissue doses in the low-to-intermediate dose range.

Conclusions

While both proton plans reduced the low-to-intermediate normal tissue doses compared to VMAT, ARPT plans improved the target coverage for the most challenging patient without significantly increasing the normal tissue doses compared to conventional robust PT plans.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2021-05-04

How to Cite

Busch, K., Dahl, B., Petersen, S. E., Rønde, H. S., Bentzen, L., Pilskog, S., & Muren, L. P. (2021). Anatomically robust proton therapy using multiple planning computed tomography scans for locally advanced prostate cancer. Acta Oncologica, 60(5), 598–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2021.1892181