The impact of positive surgical margins on salvage radiation or androgen deprivation therapy following radical prostatectomy – a nationwide study

Authors

  • Hein Vincent Stroomberg Copenhagen Prostate Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Anne Sofie Friberg Copenhagen Prostate Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • John Thomas Helgstrand Copenhagen Prostate Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Klaus Brasso Copenhagen Prostate Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Martin Andreas Røder Copenhagen Prostate Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2021.1898047

Keywords:

Radical prostatectomy, margin status, salvage radiation therapy, androgendepletion therapy, model validation

Abstract

Background

The extent to which positive surgical margins (PSM) affect the risk of subsequent salvage radiation therapy (sRT) or androgen depletion therapy (ADT) following radical prostatectomy (RP) is not well described. Initiation of additional therapies after RP depend on patient preference, individual factors, local guidelines, and life expectancy. The aim of this study was to analyze differences between margin status in risk of subsequent treatment for PCa following RP in a retrospective population-based cohort from Denmark.

Methods

Patients who underwent RP were identified in The Danish Prostate Cancer Registry (DaPCaR). Subsequent sRT and ADT were assessed in uni- and multivariate settings and validated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC).

Results

PSM was associated with an increased risk of sRT (HR = 1.85, p < .001) and receiving ADT (HR:1.39, p = .007). Margin status only had a minor impact on the predictive ability for sRT (area under the curve (AUC): p < .001) and no significant impact for subsequent ADT (AUC: p = 1). Significant inter-institutional difference in the association between PSM with sRT or ADT was observed.

Conclusion

PSM is associated with the risk of sRT and initiation of ADT, however this association is weak. Our results underline that factors beyond tumor characteristics play a major role for initiation of sRT and ADT.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2021-05-04

How to Cite

Vincent Stroomberg, H., Sofie Friberg, A., Thomas Helgstrand, J., Brasso, K., & Andreas Røder, M. (2021). The impact of positive surgical margins on salvage radiation or androgen deprivation therapy following radical prostatectomy – a nationwide study. Acta Oncologica, 60(5), 620–626. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2021.1898047