Time on treatment with abiraterone and enzalutamide in the Patient-overview Prostate Cancer in The National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden

Authors

  • Giuseppe Fallara Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
  • Charlotte Alverbratt Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Göteborg, Göteborg, Sweden
  • Hans Garmo Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Regional Cancer Centre, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala/Örebro, Sweden
  • Hanna Vikman Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
  • Marie Hjelm Eriksson Department of Oncology, St Göran Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Ingela Franck Lissbrant Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Göteborg, Göteborg, Sweden
  • Pär Stattin Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2021.1978539

Keywords:

mCRPC, enzalutamide, abiraterone, time on treatment

Abstract

Background

There are little and inconsistent data from clinical practice on time on treatment with the androgen receptor-targeted drugs (ART) abiraterone and enzalutamide in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We assessed time on treatment with ART and investigated predictors of time on treatment.

Material and methods

Time on treatment with ART in men with mCRPC in the patient-overview prostate cancer (PPC), a subregister of the National Prostate Cancer Register (NPCR) of Sweden, was assessed by use of Kaplan–Meier plots and Cox regression. To assess the representativity of PPC for time on treatment, a comparison was made with all men in NPCR who had a filling for ART in the Prescribed Drug Registry.

Results

2038 men in PPC received ART between 2015 and 2019. Median time on treatment in chemo-naïve men was 10.8 (95% confidence interval 9.1–13.1) months for abiraterone and 14.1 (13.5–15.5) for enzalutamide. After the use of docetaxel, time on treatment was 8.2 (6.5–12.4) months for abiraterone and 11.1 (9.8–12.6) for enzalutamide. Predictors of a long time on treatment with ART were long duration of ADT prior to ART, low serum levels of PSA at start of ART, absence of visceral metastasis, good performance status, and no prior use of docetaxel. PPC captured 2522/6337 (40%) of all men in NPCR who had filled a prescription for ART. Based on fillings in the Prescribed Drug Registry, men in PPC had a slightly longer median time on treatment with ART compared to all men in NPCR, 9.6 (9.1–10.3) vs. 8.6 (6.3–9.1) months.

Conclusions

Time on treatment in clinical practice was similar or shorter than that in published RCTs, due to older age, poorer performance status and more comorbidities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2021-09-17

How to Cite

Fallara, G., Alverbratt, C., Garmo, H., Vikman, H., Hjelm Eriksson, M., Franck Lissbrant, I., & Stattin, P. (2021). Time on treatment with abiraterone and enzalutamide in the Patient-overview Prostate Cancer in The National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden. Acta Oncologica, 60(12), 1589–1596. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2021.1978539