Intensity-modulated proton therapy decreases dose to organs at risk in low-grade glioma patients: results of a multicentric in silico ROCOCO trial

Authors

  • Daniëlle B. P. Eekers Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW – School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands;  Proton Therapy Centre South-East Netherlands (ZON-PTC), Maastricht, The Netherlands
  • Erik Roelofs Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW – School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands;  Department of Radiation Oncology (The D-Lab), GROW – School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
  • Macarena Cubillos-Mesías OncoRay – National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cal Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden, Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
  • Charles Niël Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiotherapiegroep, Deventer, The Netherlands
  • Robert Jan Smeenk Department of Radiation Oncology, RadboudUMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • Ann Hoeben Department of Medical Oncology, GROW – School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
  • Andre W. H. Minken Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiotherapiegroep, Deventer, The Netherlands
  • Marlies Granzier Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW – School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
  • Geert O. Janssens Department of Radiation Oncology, RadboudUMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands;  Princess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands; ;Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Johannes H. A. M. Kaanders Department of Radiation Oncology, RadboudUMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
  • Philippe Lambin Department of Radiation Oncology (The D-Lab), GROW – School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
  • Esther G. C. Troost OncoRay – National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cal Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden, Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany;  Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany;  Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden – Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology – OncoRay, Dresden, Germany;  German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany;  National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Partner Site Dresden, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden, Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2018.1529424

Abstract

Background and purpose: Patients with low-grade glioma (LGG) have a prolonged survival expectancy due to better discriminative tumor classification and multimodal treatment. Consequently, long-term treatment toxicity gains importance. Contemporary radiotherapy techniques such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), tomotherapy (TOMO) and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) enable high-dose irradiation of the target but they differ regarding delivered dose to organs at risk (OARs). The aim of this comparative in silico study was to determine these dosimetric differences in delivered doses.

Material and methods: Imaging datasets of 25 LGG patients having undergone postoperative radiotherapy were included. For each of these patients, in silico treatment plans to a total dose of 50.4 Gy to the target volume were generated for the four treatment modalities investigated (i.e., IMRT, VMAT, TOMO, IMPT). Resulting treatment plans were analyzed regarding dose to target and surrounding OARs comparing IMRT, TOMO and IMPT to VMAT.

Results: In total, 100 treatment plans (four per patient) were analyzed. Compared to VMAT, the IMPT mean dose (Dmean) for nine out of 10 (90%) OARs was statistically significantly (p < .02) reduced, for TOMO this was true in 3/10 (30%) patients and for 1/10 (10%) patients for IMRT. IMPT was the prime modality reducing dose to the OARs followed by TOMO.

Discussion: The low dose volume to the majority of OARs was significantly reduced when using IMPT compared to VMAT. Whether this will lead to a significant reduction in neurocognitive decline and improved quality of life is to be determined in carefully designed future clinical trials.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2019-01-02

How to Cite

Eekers, D. B. P., Roelofs, E., Cubillos-Mesías, M., Niël, C., Jan Smeenk, R., Hoeben, A., … Troost, E. G. C. (2019). Intensity-modulated proton therapy decreases dose to organs at risk in low-grade glioma patients: results of a multicentric in silico ROCOCO trial. Acta Oncologica, 58(1), 57–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2018.1529424