Plan-library supported automated replanning for online-adaptive intensity-modulated proton therapy of cervical cancer
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2019.1627414Keywords:
Cervical cancer, online-adaptive proton therapy, online treatment planning, plan-library, intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT)Abstract
Background: Intensity-modulated proton therapy is sensitive to inter-fraction variations, including density changes along the pencil-beam paths and variations in organ-shape and location. Large day-to-day variations are seen for cervical cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a novel method for online selection of a plan from a patient-specific library of prior plans for different anatomies, and adapt it for the daily anatomy.
Material and methods: The patient-specific library of prior plans accounting for altered target geometries was generated using a pretreatment established target motion model. Each fraction, the best fitting prior plan was selected. This prior plan was adapted using (1) a restoration of spot-positions (Bragg peaks) by adapting the energies to the new water equivalent path lengths; and (2) a spot addition to fully cover the target of the day, followed by a fast optimization of the spot-weights with the reference point method (RPM) to obtain a Pareto-optimal plan for the daily anatomy. Spot addition and spot-weight optimization could be repeated iteratively. The patient cohort consisted of six patients with in total 23 repeat-CT scans, with a prescribed dose of 45 Gy(RBE) to the primary tumor and the nodal CTV. Using a 1-plan-library (one prior plan based on all motion in the motion model) was compared to choosing from a 2-plan-library (two prior plans based on part of the motion).
Results: Applying the prior-plan adaptation method with one iteration of adding spots resulted in clinically acceptable target coverage (V95%≥95%�95%≥95% and V107%≤2%�107%≤2%) for 37/46 plans using the 1-plan-library and 41/46 plans for the 2-plan-library. When adding spots twice, the 2-plan-library approach could obtain acceptable coverage for all scans, while the 1-plan-library approach showed V107%>2%�107%>2% for 3/46 plans. Similar OAR results were obtained.
Conclusion: The automated prior-plan adaptation method can successfully adapt for the large day-to-day variations observed in cervical cancer patients.
Downloads
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Erasmus MC Cancer Centre. Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
