Plan-library supported automated replanning for online-adaptive intensity-modulated proton therapy of cervical cancer

Authors

  • Thyrza Z. Jagt Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • Sebastiaan Breedveld Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • Rens van Haveren Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • Remi A. Nout Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
  • Eleftheria Astreinidou Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
  • Ben J. M. Heijmen Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • Mischa S. Hoogeman Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands;  HollandPTC, Delft, The Netherlands

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2019.1627414

Keywords:

Cervical cancer, online-adaptive proton therapy, online treatment planning, plan-library, intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT)

Abstract

Background: Intensity-modulated proton therapy is sensitive to inter-fraction variations, including density changes along the pencil-beam paths and variations in organ-shape and location. Large day-to-day variations are seen for cervical cancer patients. The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a novel method for online selection of a plan from a patient-specific library of prior plans for different anatomies, and adapt it for the daily anatomy.

Material and methods: The patient-specific library of prior plans accounting for altered target geometries was generated using a pretreatment established target motion model. Each fraction, the best fitting prior plan was selected. This prior plan was adapted using (1) a restoration of spot-positions (Bragg peaks) by adapting the energies to the new water equivalent path lengths; and (2) a spot addition to fully cover the target of the day, followed by a fast optimization of the spot-weights with the reference point method (RPM) to obtain a Pareto-optimal plan for the daily anatomy. Spot addition and spot-weight optimization could be repeated iteratively. The patient cohort consisted of six patients with in total 23 repeat-CT scans, with a prescribed dose of 45 Gy(RBE) to the primary tumor and the nodal CTV. Using a 1-plan-library (one prior plan based on all motion in the motion model) was compared to choosing from a 2-plan-library (two prior plans based on part of the motion).

Results: Applying the prior-plan adaptation method with one iteration of adding spots resulted in clinically acceptable target coverage (V95%≥95%�95%≥95% and V107%≤2%�107%≤2%) for 37/46 plans using the 1-plan-library and 41/46 plans for the 2-plan-library. When adding spots twice, the 2-plan-library approach could obtain acceptable coverage for all scans, while the 1-plan-library approach showed V107%>2%�107%>2% for 3/46 plans. Similar OAR results were obtained.

Conclusion: The automated prior-plan adaptation method can successfully adapt for the large day-to-day variations observed in cervical cancer patients.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2019-10-03

How to Cite

Jagt, T. Z., Breedveld, S., van Haveren, R., Nout, R. A., Astreinidou, E., Heijmen, B. J. M., & Hoogeman, M. S. (2019). Plan-library supported automated replanning for online-adaptive intensity-modulated proton therapy of cervical cancer. Acta Oncologica, 58(10), 1440–1445. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2019.1627414