Validation of an established prognostic score after re-irradiation of recurrent glioma

Authors

  • Kerstin A. Kessel Department of Radiation Oncology, Technische Universität München (TUM), Munich, Germany;  Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute of Innovative Radiotherapy (iRT), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany
  • Josefine Hesse Department of Radiation Oncology, Technische Universität München (TUM), Munich, Germany
  • Christoph Straube Department of Radiation Oncology, Technische Universität München (TUM), Munich, Germany
  • Claus Zimmer Department of Neuroradiology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Friederike Schmidt-Graf Department of Neurology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Jürgen Schlegel Department of Neuropathology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Bernhard Meyer Department of Neurosurgery, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Stephanie E. Combs Department of Radiation Oncology, Technische Universität München (TUM), Munich, Germany;  Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute of Innovative Radiotherapy (iRT), Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2016.1276621

Abstract

Background: Re-irradiation (Re-RT) is offered widely in clinical routine, and has been established as a key element in the treatment of recurrent gliomas. At our center, generally re-resection is performed widely by an experienced neurosurgical team. Thus, Re-RT mostly offered to patients with macroscopic residuals or irresectable lesions, is applied later compared to other centers. Therefore, we sought to validate the Combs Prognostic Score developed in 2012 using our independent patient cohort.

Patients and methods: We included 199 patients treated from 2002 until April 2016 for recurrent glioma at the Department of Radiation Oncology at the Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Munich. Different concepts of Re-RT were applied.

Results: Median follow-up after Re-RT was 2.5 months. Median overall survival (OS) after Re-RT was 7.9 months for WHO IV gliomas, 11.3 months for WHO III gliomas, and 13.6 months for low-grade gliomas (WHO I/II). Univariate analyses confirmed the prognostic factors primary histology (p = 0.001), age (p = 0.002), and time between primary radiotherapy and Re-RT (p < 0.001). We also tested Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS), gender, and neurological symptoms before Re-RT as well as planning target volume and found only KPS also significant at p < 0.001. Comparing the prognostic score groups, the outcome was highly statistically significant at p < 0.001.

Conclusion: In our analysis, we validated the Combs Prognostic Score. Validation in this independent large patient cohort confirms the significance of the score for glioma recurrences. Thus, the role of the Combs Prognostic Score might be an essential component of future clinical decision making and patient stratification.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2017-03-04

How to Cite

Kessel, K. A., Hesse, J., Straube, C., Zimmer, C., Schmidt-Graf, F., Schlegel, J., … Combs, S. E. (2017). Validation of an established prognostic score after re-irradiation of recurrent glioma. Acta Oncologica, 56(3), 422–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2016.1276621