Acute Side Effects after Dose-Escalation Treatment of Prostate Cancer Using the New Urethral Catheter BeamCath ® Technique

Authors

  • Per Fransson From the Departments of Oncology, Umea University, Umea , Sweden
  • Per-Olov Löfroth Radiation Physics, Umea University, Umea , Sweden
  • Lars Franzén From the Departments of Oncology, Umea University, Umea , Sweden
  • Roger Henriksson From the Departments of Oncology, Umea University, Umea , Sweden
  • Per Bergström From the Departments of Oncology, Umea University, Umea , Sweden
  • Anders Widmark From the Departments of Oncology, Umea University, Umea , Sweden

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/02841860152619197

Abstract

Acute side effects after dose-escalated radiotherapy for prostate cancer with different treatment techniques were evaluated, using a daily diary recorded by the patients. Dose escalation was performed using the urethral catheter BeamCath ® technique. Side effects were evaluated in 267 patients by means of a daily diary during the treatment and at 3-months' follow-up. The patients' evaluations were compared with those of patients treated with conventional or conformal techniques. Looser stools were reported in the conventional (placebo) and 76 Gy groups at 3-months' follow-up compared with at week 1. No other obvious increase in rectal or bladder morbidity was seen in the 76 Gy group. The catheter did not increase the urinary frequency in comparison to the other groups. The reported urgency and starting problems at the beginning of treatment seemed to improve in all groups at 3-months' follow-up. External beam radiotherapy dose escalation using the BeamCath ® technique did not result in a dose-dependent increase in acute side effects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2001-01-01

How to Cite

Fransson, P., Löfroth, P.-O., Franzén, L., Henriksson, R., Bergström, P., & Widmark, A. (2001). Acute Side Effects after Dose-Escalation Treatment of Prostate Cancer Using the New Urethral Catheter BeamCath ® Technique. Acta Oncologica, 40(6), 756–765. https://doi.org/10.1080/02841860152619197