Long-term results of breast conserving surgery vs. mastectomy for early stage invasive breast cancer: 20-year follow-up of the Danish randomized DBCG-82TM protocol

Authors

  • Mogens Blichert-Toft The Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, DBCG, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Maja Nielsen The Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, DBCG, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Maria Düring The Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, DBCG, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Susanne Møller The Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, DBCG, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Fritz Rank Department of Pathology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Marie Overgaard Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
  • Henning T. Mouridsen The Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, DBCG, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/02841860801971439

Abstract

The main objective of the present study aims at comparing the long-term efficacy of breast conserving surgery (BCS) vs. mastectomy (M) based on a randomized design. The Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG) conducted the trial (DBCG-82TM) from January 1983 to March 1989 recruiting 1154 patients with invasive breast carcinoma. Follow-up time ended 1st May 2006 with a median follow-up time of 19.6 years (time span 17.1–23.3 years). Eligibility criteria included a one-sided, unifocal, primary operable breast carcinoma, patient age below 70 years, probability of satisfactory cosmetic outcome with BCS, and no evidence of disseminated disease. The patients accrued were grouped into three subsets: correctly randomized, suspicion of randomization error, and declining randomization.

The main analyses focus on the subgroup of 793 correctly randomized patients representing 70% of the complete series. 10-year recurrence free survival (RFS) and 20-year overall survival (OS) based on intent to treat did not reveal significant differences in outcome between breast conserving surgery vs. mastectomy, p=0.95 and p=0.10, respectively. Including the complete series comprising 1133 eligible patients based on treatment in fact given similarly no significant difference between surgical options could be traced in outcome of 10-year RFS and 20-year OS, p=0.94 and p=0.24, respectively.

The pattern of recurrences as a first event in breast conservation vs. mastectomy did not differ significantly irrespective of site, p=0.27. Looking into the type of local relapse, viz., new primaries vs. true recurrences, it appeared that new primaries were significantly associated to BCS, while true recurrences dominated among M treated patients (p<0.001).

In conclusion, long-term data indicate that BCS in eligible patients proves as effective as mastectomy both regarding local tumour control, RFS and OS. Local failures as a first event consistent with new primaries are strongly associated with BCS, whereas true recurrence predominates after mastectomy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2008-01-01

How to Cite

Blichert-Toft, M. ., Nielsen, M. ., Düring, M. ., Møller, S. ., Rank, F., Overgaard, M. ., & Mouridsen, H. T. . (2008). Long-term results of breast conserving surgery vs. mastectomy for early stage invasive breast cancer: 20-year follow-up of the Danish randomized DBCG-82TM protocol. Acta Oncologica, 47(4), 672–681. https://doi.org/10.1080/02841860801971439