Bisphosphonate treatment in primary breast cancer: Results from a randomised comparison of oral pamidronate versus no pamidronate in patients with primary breast cancer

Authors

  • Bent Kristensen Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Bent Ejlertsen Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Henning T. Mouridsen Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Maj-Britt Jensen the DBCG Registry, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Jørn Andersen Department of Oncology, Aarhus Hospital, Aarhus University, Denmark
  • Brita Bjerregaard Department of Oncology, Esbjerg County Hospital, Esbjerg, Denmark
  • Søren Cold Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
  • Per Edlund Department of Oncology, Gaavle County Hospital, Gaavle, Sweden
  • Marianne Ewertz Department of Oncology, Aalborg Hospital, Aarhus University, Denmark
  • Claus Kamby Department of Oncology, Herlev University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
  • Henrik Lindman Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
  • Bo Nordenskjöld Department of Oncology, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
  • Jonas Bergh Radiumhemmet, Stockholm Oncology, Karolinska Institute and University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/02841860801964988

Abstract

Purpose and patients. During the period from January 1990 to January 1996 a total of 953 patients with lymph node negative primary breast cancer were randomised to oral pamidronate (n=460) 150 mg twice daily for 4 years or no adjuvant pamidronate (n=493) in order to investigate whether oral pamidronate can prevent the occurrence of bone metastases and fractures. The patients received adjuvant chemotherapy, loco-regional radiation therapy, but no endocrine treatment. Results. During the follow-up period the number of patients with pure bone metastases was 35 in the control group and 31 in the pamidronate group. The number of patients with a combination of bone and other distant metastases were 22 in the control group and 20 in the pamidronate group. The hazard rate ratio for recurrence in bone in the pamidronate group compared to the control group was 1.03 (95% confidence interval 0.75–1.40) and p=0.86. No effect was observed on overall survival. In a small subgroup of 27 patients from the study, 12 of whom were treated with pamidronate a significant bone preserving effect was observed on bone mineral density in the lumbar spine, but not in the proximal femur. Conclusion. The results from the trial do not support a beneficial effect of oral pamidronate on the occurrence of bone metastases or fractures in patients with primary breast cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2008-01-01

How to Cite

Kristensen, B. ., Ejlertsen, B. ., Mouridsen, H. T. ., Jensen, M.-B., Andersen, J. ., Bjerregaard, B. ., … Bergh, J. . (2008). Bisphosphonate treatment in primary breast cancer: Results from a randomised comparison of oral pamidronate versus no pamidronate in patients with primary breast cancer. Acta Oncologica, 47(4), 740–746. https://doi.org/10.1080/02841860801964988