Reliability of sentinel node procedure for lymph node staging in prostate cancer patients at high risk for lymph node involvement

Authors

  • Laura Van den Bergh Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven & Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • Steven Joniau Urology, University Hospitals Leuven & Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • Karin Haustermans Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven & Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • Christophe M. Deroose Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven & Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • Sofie Isebaert Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven & Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • Raymond Oyen Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven & Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • Felix M. Mottaghy Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven & Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
  • Filip Ameye Urology, University Hospitals Leuven & Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • Joost Berkers Urology, University Hospitals Leuven & Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven & Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • Hendrik Van Poppel Urology, University Hospitals Leuven & Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
  • Evelyne Lerut Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven & Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2014.987354

Abstract

Aim. To investigate the reliability of a sentinel node (SN) procedure for nodal staging in prostate cancer (PCa) patients at high risk for lymph node (LN) involvement.

Material and methods. Seventy-four patients with localized prostate adenocarcinoma, who were clinically node-negative and had a risk of LN involvement of ≥ 10% (Partin tables), were prospectively enrolled. Upon intraprostatic 99mTc-nanocolloid injection, they underwent planar scintigraphy and SPECT imaging. Surgical removal of the SN, located by means of a gamma probe, was completed with a superextended LN dissection (seLND) as a reference and followed by radical prostatectomy.

Results. In total, 470 SN (median 6, IQR 3–9) were scintigraphically detected of which 371 (median 4, IQR 2–6) were located by gamma probe and selectively removed during surgery (79%). Histopathology confirmed LN metastases in 37 patients (50%) having 106 affected LN in total (median number per patient 2, IQR 1–4). Twenty-eight patients were node positive (N+) based on the analysis of the resected SN. However, the seLND that was performed as a reference revealed nine additional N+ patients resulting in a sensitivity of 76% (28/37). In total, 15 of 37 patients (41%) had metastases in SN only and could have been spared seLND to remove all affected nodes.

Conclusion. We found a relatively low sensitivity when addressing the SN procedure for nodal staging in PCa patients at high risk for LN involvement. Importantly, only less than half of the N+ patients could have been spared a seLND to remove all affected lymphoid tissue.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2015-07-03

How to Cite

Van den Bergh, L., Joniau, S., Haustermans, K., Deroose, C. M., Isebaert, S., Oyen, R., … Lerut, E. (2015). Reliability of sentinel node procedure for lymph node staging in prostate cancer patients at high risk for lymph node involvement. Acta Oncologica, 54(6), 896–902. https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2014.987354