Risk of Childhood Leukaemia in the Vicinity of Nuclear Installations: Findings and Recent Controversies

Authors

  • Dominique Laurier From the Institute for Protection and Nuclear Safety, Fontenay auxRoses , France (D. Laurier), the Federal Of. ce for Radiation Protection, Institute for Radiation Hygiene, Oberschleissheim, Germany (B. Grosche) and the Department of Medical Epidemiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden (P. Hall
  • Bernd Grosche From the Institute for Protection and Nuclear Safety, Fontenay auxRoses , France (D. Laurier), the Federal Of. ce for Radiation Protection, Institute for Radiation Hygiene, Oberschleissheim, Germany (B. Grosche) and the Department of Medical Epidemiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden (P. Hall
  • Per Hall From the Institute for Protection and Nuclear Safety, Fontenay auxRoses , France (D. Laurier), the Federal Of. ce for Radiation Protection, Institute for Radiation Hygiene, Oberschleissheim, Germany (B. Grosche) and the Department of Medical Epidemiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden (P. Hall

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/028418602317314019

Abstract

The identification of a local excess of cancer cases, possibly associated with ionizing radiation, always receives substantial media coverage and communication about clusters is difficult. We reviewed studies that examined the risk of leukaemia among young people near nuclear installations. An excess of leukaemia exists near some nuclear installations, at least for the reprocessing plants at Sellafield and Dounreay and the nuclear power plant Kru¨mmel. Nonetheless, the results of multi-site studies invalidate the hypothesis of an increased risk of leukaemia related to nuclear discharge. Up until now, analytic studies have not found an explanation for the leukaemia clusters observed near certain nuclear installations. The hypothesis of an infectious aetiology associated with population mixing has been proposed, but needs to be investigated further. The review illustrates two recent examples in France (La Hague reprocessing plant) and in Germany (Kru¨mmel power plant), where controversies developed after reports of increased leukaemia risks. These examples show the importance of recalling the current epidemiological knowledge and of using systematic recording of cases to replace the alleged excesses in a more general framework. Some elements should also be suggested from the recent French and German experiences to reinforce credibility in the results.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2002-01-01

How to Cite

Laurier, D., Grosche, B., & Hall, P. (2002). Risk of Childhood Leukaemia in the Vicinity of Nuclear Installations: Findings and Recent Controversies. Acta Oncologica, 41(1), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/028418602317314019