Intravenous iron supplementation for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anaemia – systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Authors

  • Anat Gafter-Gvili Institute of Hematology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah-Tiqwa, Israel; Department of Medicine E, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah-Tiqwa, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
  • Benaya Rozen-Zvi Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah-Tikva, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
  • Liat Vidal Institute of Hematology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah-Tiqwa, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
  • Leonard Leibovici Department of Medicine E, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah-Tiqwa, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
  • Johan Vansteenkiste Respiratory Oncology Unit, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
  • Uzi Gafter Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah-Tikva, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
  • Ofer Shpilberg Institute of Hematology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah-Tiqwa, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2012.702921

Abstract

Background: Current guidelines are inconclusive regarding intravenous (IV) iron for treatment of chemotherapy-induced anaemia (CIA). Material and methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing IV iron with no iron or oral iron for treatment of chemotherapy induced anaemia (CIA). Primary outcomes: haematopoietic response and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion requirements. For dichotomous data, relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated and pooled. For continuous data, weighted mean differences were calculated. Results: Eleven trials included 1681 patients, the majority examining the addition of IV iron to erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESA) (1562 patients, 92.9%). IV iron significantly increased haematopoietic response rate [RR 1.28 (95% CI 1.125–1.45), seven trials with ESA] and decreased the rate of blood transfusions both in trials with ESA [RR 0.76 (95% CI 0.61–0.95), seven trials] and without ESA [RR 0.52 (95% CI 0.34–0.80)]. The increase in haematopoietic response rate correlated with total IV iron dose, regardless of baseline iron status. Mortality and safety profile was comparable between groups. Conclusions: IV iron added to ESA results in an increase in haematopoietic response and reduction in the need for RBC transfusions, with no difference in mortality or adverse events.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2013-01-01

How to Cite

Gafter-Gvili, A., Rozen-Zvi, B., Vidal, L., Leibovici, L., Vansteenkiste, J., Gafter, U., & Shpilberg, O. (2013). Intravenous iron supplementation for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anaemia – systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Acta Oncologica, 52(1), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2012.702921