Positron Emission Tomography and Radioimmunotargeting: General Aspects

Authors

  • Hans Lundqvist Department of Oncology, Radiology and Clinical Immunology (H. Lundqvist, M. Lubberink, V. Tolmachev, A. Lo vqvist, A. Sundin, J. Carlsson, J.-E. Westlin), the Department of Internal Medicine, Renal Section, Uppsala University, Sweden (S. Beshara) and the Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow (A. Bruskin)
  • Mark Lubberink Department of Oncology, Radiology and Clinical Immunology (H. Lundqvist, M. Lubberink, V. Tolmachev, A. Lo vqvist, A. Sundin, J. Carlsson, J.-E. Westlin), the Department of Internal Medicine, Renal Section, Uppsala University, Sweden (S. Beshara) and the Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow (A. Bruskin)
  • Vladimir Tolmachev Department of Oncology, Radiology and Clinical Immunology (H. Lundqvist, M. Lubberink, V. Tolmachev, A. Lo vqvist, A. Sundin, J. Carlsson, J.-E. Westlin), the Department of Internal Medicine, Renal Section, Uppsala University, Sweden (S. Beshara) and the Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow (A. Bruskin)
  • Anna Lövqvist Department of Oncology, Radiology and Clinical Immunology (H. Lundqvist, M. Lubberink, V. Tolmachev, A. Lo vqvist, A. Sundin, J. Carlsson, J.-E. Westlin), the Department of Internal Medicine, Renal Section, Uppsala University, Sweden (S. Beshara) and the Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow (A. Bruskin)
  • Anders Sundin Department of Oncology, Radiology and Clinical Immunology (H. Lundqvist, M. Lubberink, V. Tolmachev, A. Lo vqvist, A. Sundin, J. Carlsson, J.-E. Westlin), the Department of Internal Medicine, Renal Section, Uppsala University, Sweden (S. Beshara) and the Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow (A. Bruskin)
  • Soheir Beshara Department of Oncology, Radiology and Clinical Immunology (H. Lundqvist, M. Lubberink, V. Tolmachev, A. Lo vqvist, A. Sundin, J. Carlsson, J.-E. Westlin), the Department of Internal Medicine, Renal Section, Uppsala University, Sweden (S. Beshara) and the Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow (A. Bruskin)
  • Alexander Bruskin Department of Oncology, Radiology and Clinical Immunology (H. Lundqvist, M. Lubberink, V. Tolmachev, A. Lo vqvist, A. Sundin, J. Carlsson, J.-E. Westlin), the Department of Internal Medicine, Renal Section, Uppsala University, Sweden (S. Beshara) and the Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow (A. Bruskin)
  • Jörgen Carlsson Department of Oncology, Radiology and Clinical Immunology (H. Lundqvist, M. Lubberink, V. Tolmachev, A. Lo vqvist, A. Sundin, J. Carlsson, J.-E. Westlin), the Department of Internal Medicine, Renal Section, Uppsala University, Sweden (S. Beshara) and the Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow (A. Bruskin)
  • Jan-Erik Westlin Department of Oncology, Radiology and Clinical Immunology (H. Lundqvist, M. Lubberink, V. Tolmachev, A. Lo vqvist, A. Sundin, J. Carlsson, J.-E. Westlin), the Department of Internal Medicine, Renal Section, Uppsala University, Sweden (S. Beshara) and the Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow (A. Bruskin)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/028418699431410

Abstract

To optimize radioimmunotherapy, in vivo information on individual patients, such as radionuclide uptake, kinetics, metabolic patterns and optimal administration methods, is important. An overriding problem is to determine accurately the absorbed dose in the target organ as well as critical organs. Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is a superior technique to quantify regional kinetics in vivo with a spatial resolution better than 1 cm3 and a temporal resolution better than 10 s. However, target molecules often have distribution times of several hours to days. Conventional PET nuclides are not applicable and alternative positron-emitting nuclides with matching half-lives and with suitable labelling properties are thus necessary. Over many years we have systematically developed convenient production methods and labelling techniques of suitable positron nuclides, such as 110In(T½=1.15 h), 86Y(T½=14 h), 76Br(T½=16 h) and 124I(T½=4 days). 'Dose planning' can be done, for example, with 86Y- or 124I-labelled ligands before therapy, and 90Y- and 131I-labelled analogues and double-labelling, e.g. with a 86Y/90Y-labelled ligand, can be used to determine the true radioactivity integral from a pure beta-emitting nuclide. The usefulness of these techniques was demonstrated in animal and patient studies by halogen-labelled MAbs and EGF-dextran conjugates and peptides chelated with metal ions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

1999-01-01

How to Cite

Lundqvist, H., Lubberink, M., Tolmachev, V., Lövqvist, A., Sundin, A., Beshara, S., … Westlin, J.-E. (1999). Positron Emission Tomography and Radioimmunotargeting: General Aspects. Acta Oncologica, 38(3), 335–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/028418699431410