Dose evaluation and risk estimation for secondary cancer in contralateral breast and a study of correlation between thorax shape and dose to organs at risk following tangentially breast irradiation during deep inspiration breath-hold and free breathing

Authors

  • Safora Johansen Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
  • Johan Vikström Department of Radiotherapy, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
  • Mari Helene Blihovde Hjelstuen Department of Radiotherapy, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
  • Ingvil Mjaaland Department of Radiotherapy, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
  • Kjell Ivar Dybvik Department of Radiotherapy, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
  • Dag Rune Olsen Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Norway

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2010.541933

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the impact of using breathing adapted radiotherapy on contralateral breast (CB) dose, to relate the thorax shape with the dose to the organs at risk (OARs) and to predict the risk for induced malignancies in CB using linear and non-linear models, following tangential irradiation of breast. Material and methods. Sixteen patients with stage I-II breast cancer treatment planned with tangential fields using deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) and free breathing (FB) techniques were included in this analysis. The dose results mainly based on DVH analysis were compared. Four parameters were defined to describe thoracic shape. Excess relative risk (ERR) for cancer induction in CB, employing linear and non-linear models was calculated. Results. Average CB volumes exposed to a dose of 1 Gy is 1.3 times higher in DIBH plans than in FB plans. No significant difference in average V3Gy and V5Gy for DIBH and FB plans is observed. The average mean CB dose for DIBH and FB plans is 0.33 and 0.28 Gy, respectively. No correlation between thorax shape parameters and mean OARs dose is observed. The estimated average mean ERR with linear model is lower in FB plans (0.12) than for the DIBH plans (0.14). The estimated ERR with non-linear model is 0.14 for DIBH plans and 0.15 for FB plans. Conclusion. No significant difference in CB dose between DIBH and FB plans is observed. The four thorax shape parameters defined in this study can not be related to the dose at OARs using DIBH and FB radiation techniques. The ERR estimates for secondary CB cancer are nearly the same for FB and DIBH planning when using a linear and non-linear risk prediction models.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2011-05-01

How to Cite

Johansen, S., Vikström, J., Blihovde Hjelstuen, M. H., Mjaaland, I., Ivar Dybvik, K., & Rune Olsen, D. (2011). Dose evaluation and risk estimation for secondary cancer in contralateral breast and a study of correlation between thorax shape and dose to organs at risk following tangentially breast irradiation during deep inspiration breath-hold and free breathing. Acta Oncologica, 50(4), 563–568. https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2010.541933