Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival outcomes for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma in Denmark between 2011 and 2018: a nationwide population-based cohort study

Authors

  • Jens Benn Sørensen Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7780-0178
  • Paul Baas Department of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Szimonetta Komjáthiné Szépligeti Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
  • Alma B. Pedersen Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
  • Søren P. Johnsen Danish Center for Health Services Research, Department for Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University Aalborg, Denmark
  • Robert Carroll Centre for Observational Research and Data Science, Bristol Myers Squibb, Uxbridge, UK
  • Minouk J. Schoemaker Real World Solutions, IQVIA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Caroline Rault Data Gnosis, Rennes, France
  • Melinda J. Daumont Worldwide Health Economics & Outcomes Research, Bristol Myers Squibb, Braine-L’Alleud, Belgium
  • Vera Ehrenstein Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2024.34802

Keywords:

Cohort study, Denmark, Epidemiology, malignant pleural mesothelioma, registries

Abstract

Background: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare thoracic malignancy with poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Immunotherapy shows potential for improved outcomes; however, real-world evidence on its use will take time to accumulate. This study examined patient characteristics, treatment patterns, overall survival (OS), and predictors of mortality among patients diagnosed with MPM in Denmark prior to the introduction of newer treatments.

Methods: This historical cohort study based on routinely collected Danish National Registry data included adults newly diagnosed with MPM between 01 January 2011 and 31 May 2018. Summary statistics were used to describe patient characteristics and initial treatment. OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods; Cox regression was used to compare patient mortality against the (age/sex-matched) general population and to investigate mortality predictors.

Results: Overall, 880 patients were included; 44% had advanced MPM, 37% had non-advanced MPM, and 19% had unknown MPM stage. Median age at diagnosis was 71.9 years, and 82% of the patients were male. Within 180 days of diagnosis, no treatment was recorded for 215 patients (54%) with advanced MPM and 150 (46%) with non-advanced MPM. Median time-to-initial treatment (interquartile range) was 47 days (31–111) overall, 40 days (28–77) in patients with advanced MPM, and 53 days (35–121) with non-advanced MPM. Median OS was 13.7 months overall (non-advanced MPM: 18.0 months vs. advanced MPM: 10.0 months). Predictors of higher mortality were older age at diagnosis, histology, and advanced MPM stage.

Interpretation: These findings provide a baseline upon which to evaluate MPM epidemiology as newer treatments are adopted in routine practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Tedesco J, Jaradeh M, Vigneswaran WT. Malignant pleural mesothelioma: current understanding of the immune microenvironment and treatments of a rare disease. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14(18):4415.

https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14184415 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14184415

Zhai Z, Ruan J, Zheng Y, Xiang D, Li N, Hu J et al. Assessment of global trends in the diagnosis of mesothelioma from 1990 to 2017. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(8):e2120360.

https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.20360 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.20360

Baas P, Fennell D, Kerr KM, Van Schil PE, Haas RL, Peters S et al. Malignant pleural mesothelioma: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2015;26 Suppl 5:v31–v39.

https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdv199 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdv199

Hemminki K, Forsti A, Chen T, Hemminki A. Incidence, mortality and survival in malignant pleural mesothelioma before and after asbestos in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden. BMC Cancer. 2021;21(1):1189.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08913-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08913-2

Scherpereel A, Opitz I, Berghmans T, Psallidas I, Glatzer M, Rigau D et al. ERS/ESTS/EACTS/ESTRO guidelines for the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Eur Respir J. 2020;55(6):1900953.

https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00953-2019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00953-2019

Reid A, de Klerk NH, Magnani C, Ferrante D, Berry G, Musk AW et al. Mesothelioma risk after 40 years since first exposure to asbestos: a pooled analysis. Thorax. 2014;69(9):843–850.

https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-204161 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-204161

Fonseca AS, Jorgensen AK, Larsen BX, Moser-Johansen M, Flachs EM, Ebbehoj NE et al. Historical asbestos measurements in Denmark-a national database. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(2):643.

https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020643 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020643

Mensi C, De Matteis S, Dallari B, Riboldi L, Bertazzi PA, Consonni D. Incidence of mesothelioma in Lombardy, Italy: exposure to ­asbestos, time patterns and future projections. Occup Environ Med. 2016;73(9):607–613.

https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2016-103652 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2016-103652

Loomis D, Richardson DB, Elliott L. Quantitative relationships of exposure to chrysotile asbestos and mesothelioma mortality. Am J Ind Med. 2019;62(6):471–477.

https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.22985 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.22985

Brims F. Epidemiology and clinical aspects of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(16):4194.

https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13164194 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13164194

Amin W, Linkov F, Landsittel DP, Silverstein JC, Bashara W, Gaudioso C et al. Factors influencing malignant mesothelioma survival: a retrospective review of the National Mesothelioma Virtual Bank cohort. F1000Res. 2018;7:1184.

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15512.2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.15512.2

Bibby AC, Tsim S, Kanellakis N, Ball H, Talbot DC, Blyth KG et al. Malignant pleural mesothelioma: an update on investigation, diagnosis and treatment. Eur Respir Rev. 2016;25(142):472–486.

https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0063-2016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0063-2016

American Cancer Society. Survival rates for malignant mesothelioma. [cited 2022 Nov 14]. Available from: https://www.cancer.org/cancer/malignant-mesothelioma/detection-diagnosis-staging/survival-statistics.html

Offin M, Rusch VW, Rimner A, Adusumilli PS, Zauderer MG. Evolving landscape of initial treatments for patients with malignant pleural mesotheliomas: clinical trials to clinical practice. Oncologist. 2022;27(8):610–614.

https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyac113 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyac113

Rusch VW, Giroux D, Kennedy C, Ruffini E, Cangir AK, Rice D et al. Initial analysis of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer mesothelioma database. J Thorac Oncol. 2012;7(11):1631–1639.

https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e31826915f1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e31826915f1

Meyerhoff RR, Yang CF, Speicher PJ, Gulack BC, Hartwig MG, D’Amico TA et al. Impact of mesothelioma histologic subtype on outcomes in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. J Surg Res. 2015;196(1):23–32.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2015.01.043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2015.01.043

Vogelzang NJ, Rusthoven JJ, Symanowski J, Denham C, Kaukel E, Ruffie P et al. Phase III study of pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin versus cisplatin alone in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(14):2636–2644.

https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2003.11.136 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2003.11.136

Nowak AK, Jackson A, Sidhu C. Management of advanced pleural mesothelioma-at the crossroads. JCO Oncol Pract. 2022;18(2):116–124.

https://doi.org/10.1200/OP.21.00426 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/OP.21.00426

Baas P, Scherpereel A, Nowak AK, Fujimoto N, Peters S, Tsao AS et al. First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab in unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (CheckMate 743): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2021;397(10272):375–386.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32714-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32714-8

Bristol Myers Squibb. Bristol Myers Squibb receives European Commission approval for Opdivo (nivolumab) plus Yervoy (ipilimumab) as first-line treatment for unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma. 2021 [cited 2022 Nov 23]. Available from: https://news.bms.com/news/details/2021/Bristol-Myers-Squibb-Receives-European-Commission-Approval-for-Opdivo-nivolumab-Plus-Yervoy-ipilimumab-as-First-Line-Treatment-for-Unresectable-Malignant-Pleural-Mesothelioma/default.aspx

Nakajima EC, Vellanki PJ, Larkins E, Chatterjee S, Mishra-Kalyani PS, Bi Y et al. FDA approval summary: nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab for the treatment of unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma. Clin Cancer Res. 2022;28(3):446–451.

https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-1466 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-1466

Popat S, Baas P, Faivre-Finn C, Girard N, Nicholson AG, Nowak AK et al. Malignant pleural mesothelioma: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2022;33(2):129–142.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2021.11.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2021.11.005

Medicinraadet. Medicinraadet 2022. [cited 2023 May 17]. Available from: https://medicinraadet.dk/anbefalinger-og-vejledninger/laegemidler-og-indikationsudvidelser/m-p/nivolumab-opdivo-i-komb-med-ipilimumab-til-1-linjebehandling-af-ikke-resekterbar-malignt-pleuralt-mesotheliom

Baas P, Daumont MJ, Lacoin L, Penrod JR, Carroll R, Venkatesan S et al. Treatment patterns and outcomes for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma in England in 2013–2017: a nationwide CAS registry analysis from the I-O Optimise initiative. Lung Cancer. 2021;162:185–193.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.11.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.11.001

Laugesen K, Ludvigsson JF, Schmidt M, Gissler M, Valdimarsdottir UA, Lunde A et al. Nordic health registry-based research: a review of health care systems and key registries. Clin Epidemiol. 2021;13:533–554.

https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S314959 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S314959

Ekman S, Griesinger F, Baas P, Chao D, Chouaid C, O’Donnell JC et al. I-O Optimise: a novel multinational real-world research platform in thoracic malignancies. Future Oncol. 2019;15(14):1551–1563.

https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2019-0025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2019-0025

Schmidt M, Pedersen L, Sorensen HT. The Danish Civil Registration System as a tool in epidemiology. Eur J Epidemiol. 2014;29(8):541–549.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-014-9930-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-014-9930-3

Gjerstorff ML. The Danish Cancer Registry. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39(7 Suppl):42–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494810393562

Schmidt M, Schmidt SA, Sandegaard JL, Ehrenstein V, Pedersen L, Sorensen HT. The Danish National Patient Registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential. Clin Epidemiol. 2015;7:449–490.

https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S91125 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S91125

Berzenji L, Van Schil PE, Carp L. The eighth TNM classification for malignant pleural mesothelioma. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2018;7(5):543–549.

https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr.2018.07.05 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr.2018.07.05

Rusch VW. A proposed new international TNM staging system for malignant pleural mesothelioma from the International Mesothelioma Interest Group. Lung Cancer. 1996;14(1):1–12.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5002(95)00508-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5002(95)00508-0

Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958;53:457–481.

https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452

Cox DR. Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 1972;34:187–220.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x

Damhuis RA, Khakwani A, De Schutter H, Rich AL, Burgers JA, van Meerbeeck JP. Treatment patterns and survival analysis in 9014 patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma from Belgium, the Netherlands and England. Lung Cancer. 2015;89(2):212–217.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2015.05.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2015.05.014

Alpert N, van Gerwen M, Taioli E. Epidemiology of mesothelioma in the 21(st) century in Europe and the United States, 40 years after restricted/banned asbestos use. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2020;9(Suppl 1):S28–S38.

https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr.2019.11.11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr.2019.11.11

Brcic L, Kern I. Clinical significance of histologic subtyping of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2020;9(3):924–933.

https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr.2020.03.38 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr.2020.03.38

Ziolkowska B, Cybulska-Stopa B, Papantoniou D, Suwinski R. Systemic treatment in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma – real life experience. BMC Cancer. 2022;22(1):432.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09490-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09490-8

Kuryk L, Rodella G, Staniszewska M, Pancer KW, Wieczorek M, Salmaso S et al. Novel insights into mesothelioma therapy: emerging avenues and future prospects. Front Oncol. 2022;12:916839.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.916839 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.916839

Skammeritz E, Omland O, Hansen J, Johansen JP. Regional differences in incidence of malignant mesothelioma in Denmark. Dan Med J. 2013;60(3):A4592.

Rijavec E, Biello F, Barletta G, Dellepiane C, Genova C. Novel approaches for the treatment of unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma: a focus on immunotherapy and target therapy (review). Mol Clin Oncol. 2022;16(4):89.

https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2022.2522 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2022.2522

Davis AP, Kao SC, Clarke SJ, Boyer M, Pavlakis N. Emerging biological therapies for the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2021;26(2):179–192.

https://doi.org/10.1080/14728214.2021.1924670 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14728214.2021.1924670

Lapidot M, Saladi SV, Salgia R, Sattler M. Novel therapeutic targets and immune dysfunction in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:806570.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.806570 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.806570

Additional Files

Published

2024-08-08

How to Cite

Sørensen, J. B., Baas, P., Szépligeti, S. K., Pedersen, A. B., Johnsen, S. P., Carroll, R., … Ehrenstein, V. (2024). Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival outcomes for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma in Denmark between 2011 and 2018: a nationwide population-based cohort study. Acta Oncologica, 63(1), 649–657. https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2024.34802

Issue

Section

Original article

Categories