Nordic anal cancer (NOAC) group consensus guidelines for risk-adapted delineation of the elective clinical target volume in anal cancer

Authors

  • Martin P. Nilsson a Division of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; b Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
  • Christine Undseth c Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
  • Per Albertsson d Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, and Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
  • Monika Eidem e Cancer Clinic, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Norway
  • Birgitte Mayland Havelund f Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
  • Jakob Johannsson g Department of Radiation Oncology, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
  • Anders Johnsson b Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
  • Calin Radu h Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Sweden
  • Eva Serup-Hansen i Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Karen-Lise Spindler j Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
  • Björn Zakrisson k Department of radiation sciences – oncology, Umeå University
  • Marianne G. Guren c Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; l Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • Camilla Kronborg m Danish, Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2023.2240490

Keywords:

Anal carcinoma, delineation, contouring, para-aortic, common iliac

Abstract

Background: To date, anal cancer patients are treated with radiotherapy to similar volumes despite a marked difference in risk profile based on tumor location and stage. A more individualized approach to delineation of the elective clinical target volume (CTVe) could potentially provide better oncological outcomes as well as improved quality of life. The aim of the present work was to establish Nordic Anal Cancer (NOAC) group guidelines for delineation of the CTVe in anal cancer.

Methods: First, 12 radiation oncologists reviewed the literature in one of the following four areas: (1) previous delineation guidelines; (2) patterns of recurrence; (3) anatomical studies; (4) common iliac and para-aortic recurrences and delineation guidelines. Second, areas of controversy were identified and discussed with the aim of reaching consensus.

Results: We present consensus-based recommendations for CTVe delineation in anal cancer regarding (a) which regions to include, and (b) how the regions should be delineated. Some of our recommendations deviate from current international guidelines. For instance, the posterolateral part of the inguinal region is excluded, decreasing the volume of irradiated normal tissue. For the external iliac region and the cranial border of the CTVe, we agreed on specifying two different recommendations, both considered acceptable. One of these recommendations is novel and risk-adapted; the external iliac region is omitted for low-risk patients, and several different cranial borders are used depending on the individual level of risk.

Conclusion: We present NOAC consensus guidelines for delineation of the CTVe in anal cancer, including a risk-adapted strategy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-03

How to Cite

Nilsson, M. P., Undseth, C., Albertsson, P., Eidem, M., Mayland Havelund, B., Johannsson, J., … Kronborg, C. (2023). Nordic anal cancer (NOAC) group consensus guidelines for risk-adapted delineation of the elective clinical target volume in anal cancer. Acta Oncologica, 62(8), 897–906. https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2023.2240490