Coverage of mammography imaging in and outside an organized breast cancer screening program – variation by age and sociodemographic groups

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2024.40830

Keywords:

breast cancer screening, opportunistic screening, screening program

Abstract

Introduction: In recent decades, attendance to organized breast cancer screening has been decreasing in European countries. This could be partly due to an increase in the use of opportunistic screening. The aim of this study was to assess the coverage of imaging in and outside the screening program in Finland during the period of 1999–2018. We also compared the usage of imaging services across sociodemographic groups in the more recent years (2017–2018).

Methods: Our initial data consisted of 1,159,000 screening-target-aged women (50–69 years) in 1999–2018 and 1,849,000 women aged 30–89 years in 2017–2018. Data on organized breast cancer screening program was drawn from the Finnish Cancer Registry and supplemented with comprehensive individual data on mammograms and ultrasounds performed outside the program.

Results: Among the screening-aged women (50–69), a clear decline in the overall imaging coverage was observed during the study period (from 89 to 85%). The use of outside imaging increased slightly but not enough to compensate for the overall decrease. There were large differences in coverages between sociodemographic groups. Compared to manual workers and the unemployed, upper-level employees were around two times more active in using outside imaging (8.2% vs. 3.6% and 4.3%, respectively).

Interpretation: Overall breast imaging coverage has slowly decreased during the 2000s, while outside imaging has increased slightly. The coverage of imaging in and outside the program largely followed the same trends, with the highest usage concentrating on higher socioeconomical groups, native speakers and highly educated women.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

European Commission. Cancer screening statistics [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Jul 28]. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Cancerscreeningstatistics

Cardoso R, Hoffmeister M, Brenner H. Breast cancer screening programmes and self-reported mammography use in European countries. Int J Cancer. 2023;152(12): 2512–27.

https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.34494 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.34494

Andermann A, Blancquaert I, Beauchamp S, et al. Revisiting Wilson and Jungner in the genomic age: a review of screening criteria over the past 40 years. Bull World Health Organ. 2008;86(4):317–9. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2647421/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.07.050112

Wilson JMG, Jungner G, World Health Organization. The principles and practice of screening for disease [Internet]. World Health Organization; 1966 [cited 2023 Oct 4]. Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/208882

Lebano A, Hamed S, Bradby H, et al. Migrants’ and refugees’ health status and healthcare in Europe: a scoping literature review. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1039.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08749-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08749-8

Palència L, Espelt A, Rodríguez-Sanz M, et al. Socio-economic inequalities in breast and cervical cancer screening practices in Europe: influence of the type of screening program. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39(3):757–65.

https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyq003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyq003

Walsh B, Silles M, O’Neill C. The importance of socio-economic variables in cancer screening participation: a comparison between population-based and opportunistic screening in the EU-15. Health Policy. 2011;101(3):269–76.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.02.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.02.001

Ruonala V. Radiologisten tutkimusten ja toimenpiteiden määrät vuonna 2018 [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2024 Apr 10] Available from: https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-309-449-9

Finland S. Classifications | Classification of socio-economic groups 1989 | Tilastokeskus [Internet]. Statistics Finland. [cited 2024 Sept 12]. Available from: https://stat.fi/en/luokitukset/sosioekonasema/sosioekon asema119890101/

Finland S. Classifications | Classification of Socio-economic Groups 1989 | Long-term unemployed | Tilastokeskus [Internet]. Statistics Finland. [cited 2024 Sept 12]. Available from: https://stat.fi/fi/luokitukset/sosioekonasema/?code=81&name=Long-term%20unemployed

Finland S. Classifications | National level of education 2016 | Tilastokeskus [Internet]. Statistics Finland. [cited 2024 Sept 12]. Available from: https://stat.fi/en/luokitukset/koulutusaste/

Finland S. Classifications | Px code list of municipalities and regional divisions based on municipalities 2024 | Tilastokeskus [Internet]. Statistics Finland. [cited 2024 May 17]. Available from: https://stat.fi/en/luokitukset/alue/

Fay MP, Feuer EJ. Confidence intervals for directly standardized rates: a method based on the gamma distribution. Stat Med. 1997;16(7):791–801. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19970415)16:7<791::AID-SIM500>3.3.CO;2-R

https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19970415)16:7%3C791::AID-SIM500%3E3.0.CO;2-#

Blomgren J, Virta LJ. Socioeconomic differences in use of public, occupational and private health care: a register-linkage study of a working-age population in Finland. PLoS One. 2020;15(4):e0231792.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231792 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231792

Damiani G, Basso D, Acampora A, et al. The impact of level of education on adherence to breast and cervical cancer screening: Evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med. 2015;81:281–9.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.09.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.09.011

Kim J, Jang SN. Socioeconomic disparities in breast cancer screening among US women: trends from 2000 to 2005. J Prev Med Public Health. 2008;41(3):186–94.

https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2008.41.3.186 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.2008.41.3.186

Dubay LC, Lebrun LA. Health, behavior, and health care disparities: disentangling the effects of income and race in the United States. Int J Health Serv. 2012;42(4):607–25.

https://doi.org/10.2190/HS.42.4.c DOI: https://doi.org/10.2190/HS.42.4.c

Kaur S. Barriers faced by refugees to access health care services in Finland [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 Jul 17]. Available from: http://www.theseus.fi/handle/10024/502927

Njor SH, Heinävaara S, Stefansdóttir H, et al. Differences in mammography screening attendance among non-Western immigrants in Denmark, Finland, Iceland and Norway. Prev Med Rep. 2023;36:102516.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102516 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102516

von Euler-Chelpin M, Olsen AH, Njor S, et al. Women’s patterns of participation in mammography screening in Denmark. Eur J Epidemiol. 2006;21(3):203–9.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-006-0002-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-006-0002-1

European Commission. Breast cancer screening differs among Member States [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 Jul 28]. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/edn-20201014-1

Eurostat. Breast cancer and cervical cancer screenings – historical data (2000–2021) [Internet]. Statistics | Eurostat; 2022 [cited 2023 Jul 28]. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/hlthps scre/default/table?lang=en

Perry N, Broeders M, de Wolf C, et al., editors. European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis. 4th ed. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities; 2006. 416 p.

Lynge E., Braaten T, Njor SH, et al. Mammography activity in Norway 1983 to 2008. Acta Oncol. 2011;50(7):1062–7.

https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2011.599339 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2011.599339

Radiation Act 859/2018 [Internet]. [cited 2024 Sep 12]. Available from: https://finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/2018/en2018085920231080.pdf

Graetz V, Rechel B, Groot W, et al. Utilization of health care services by migrants in Europe – a systematic literature review. Br Med Bull. 2017;121(1):5–18.

https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldw057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldw057

Koponen P, Kuusio H, Keskimäki I, et al. Unmet needs for medical care among migrants in Finland: Päivikki Koponen. Eur J Public Health. 2014;24(Suppl_2):cku162-020.

https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cku162.020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cku162.020

Tatari CR, Andersen B, Brogaard T, et al. Perceptions about cancer and barriers towards cancer screening among ethnic minority women in a deprived area in Denmark – a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):921.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09037-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09037-1

European Commission. Inviting and informing women about screening [Internet]. European Commission Initiative on Breast and Colorectal Cancer; 2023 [cited 2023 Jul 30]. Available from: https://healthcare-quality.jrc.ec.europa.eu/european-breast-cancer-guidelines/Invitation-to-screening-and-decision-aid

Breast cancer screening programme in Finland. Annual review 2017 [Internet]. Finnish Cancer Registry. [cited 2024 Sept 12]. Available from: https://cancerregistry.fi/screening/breast-cancer-screening/

Published

2024-10-29

How to Cite

Fuhrmann, J., Heinävaara, S., Sarkeala, T., Lehtinen, M., & Pankakoski, M. (2024). Coverage of mammography imaging in and outside an organized breast cancer screening program – variation by age and sociodemographic groups. Acta Oncologica, 63(1), 833–840. https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2024.40830

Issue

Section

Original article