Postoperative complications and health-related quality of life after oesophageal cancer surgery: a national, population-based cohort study

Authors

  • Pernilla Lagergren Surgical Care Science, Department of Molecular medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, United Kingdom
  • Asif Johar Surgical Care Science, Department of Molecular medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Anna Schandl Surgical Care Science, Department of Molecular medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Perioperative- and Intensive Care, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2024.41290

Keywords:

Oesophageal neoplasm, oesophagectomy, gastro-oesophageal, cancer survivorship

Abstract

Background and purpose: Surgical resection for oesophageal cancer is technically challenging and associated with a high incidence of complications. This study aimed to assess whether complications influence long-term health-related quality of life (HRQL) in oesophageal cancer survivors.

Materials and methods: This nationwide cohort study included 617 patients who underwent oesophagectomy for cancer in Sweden between 2013 and 2021 with a 1-year follow-up. Complications within 30 days of surgery were categorised into (1) with or without, (2) medical or surgical and (3) according to the Clavien-Dindo classification (0–1, 2–3a, 3b–4). HRQL was assessed with European Organisation for Research and Treatment questionnaires and analysed using multivariable linear regression models, proving mean score differences (MSD) with 95% confidence intervals. The MSDs were adjusted for age, sex, education level, comorbidity, tumour histology, tumour stage, surgical technique and neoadjuvant therapy.

Results: The cohort included 406 patients who survived at least 1 year after oesophageal cancer surgery. Of these, 273 (68%) had at least one complication in the first 30 postoperative days. Long-term HRQL was comparable between patients with or without complications, with or without medical and surgical complications and between different grades of complication severity.

Interpretation: This study suggests that the influence of complications within 30 days of oesophageal cancer surgery on HRQL is minor after 1 year.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Borggreve AS, Kingma BF, Domrachev SA, Koshkin MA, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R, et al. Surgical treatment of esophageal cancer in the era of multimodality management. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018;1434(1):192–209.

https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13677

Lagergren J, Lagergren P. Recent developments in esophageal adenocarcinoma. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63(4):232–48.

https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21185

Low DE, Kuppusamy MK, Alderson D, Cecconello I, Chang AC, Darling G, et al. Benchmarking complications associated with esophagectomy. Ann Surg. 2019;269(2):291–8.

https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002611

Blencowe NS, Strong S, McNair AG, Brookes ST, Crosby T, Griffin SM, et al. Reporting of short-term clinical outcomes after esophagectomy: a systematic review. Ann Surg. 2012;255(4):658–66.

https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182480a6a

Booka E, Takeuchi H, Suda K, Fukuda K, Nakamura R, Wada N, et al. Meta-analysis of the impact of postoperative complications on survival after oesophagectomy for cancer. BJS Open. 2018;2(5):276–84.

https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.64

Kauppila JH, Johar A, Lagergren P. Medical and surgical complications and health-related quality of life after esophageal cancer surgery. Ann Surg. 2020;271(3):502–8.

https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003097

Jacobs M, Macefield RC, Elbers RG, Sitnikova K, Korfage IJ, Smets EMA, et al. Meta-analysis shows clinically relevant and long-lasting deterioration in health-related quality of life after esophageal cancer surgery. Qual Life Res. 2014;23(4):1097–115.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0545-z

Derogar M, Orsini N, Sadr-Azodi O, Lagergren P. Influence of major postoperative complications on health-related quality of life among long-term survivors of esophageal cancer surgery. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(14):1615–19.

https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.40.3568

Schandl A, Lagergren J, Johar A, Lagergren P. Health-related quality of life 10 years after oesophageal cancer surgery. Eur J Cancer. 2016;69:43–50.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2016.09.032

Schuring N, Jezerskyte E, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Sprangers MAG, Lagergren P, Johar A, et al. Influence of postoperative complications following esophagectomy for cancer on quality of life: a European multicenter study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2023;49(1):97–105.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2022.07.020

Jezerskyte E, van Berge Henegouwen MI, van Laarhoven HWM, van Kleef JJ, Eshuis WJ, Heisterkamp J, et al. Postoperative complications and long-term quality of life after multimodality treatment for esophageal cancer: an analysis of the Prospective Observational Cohort Study of Esophageal-Gastric Cancer Patients (POCOP). Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(12):7259–76.

https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-10144-5

Voron T, Lintis A, Piessen G. Hybrid esophagectomy. J Thorac Dis. 2019;11(Suppl. 5):S723–7.

https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd.2018.12.92

Findlay JM, Gillies RS, Millo J, Sgromo B, Marshall RE, Maynard ND. Enhanced recovery for esophagectomy: a systematic review and evidence-based guidelines. Ann Surg. 2014;259(3):413–31.

https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000349

Preston SR, Markar SR, Baker CR, Soon Y, Singh S, Low DE. Impact of a multidisciplinary standardized clinical pathway on perioperative outcomes in patients with oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg. 2013;100(1):105–12.

https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.8974

Schandl A, Johar A, Anandavadivelan P, Vikstrom K, Malberg K, Lagergren P. Patient-reported outcomes 1 year after oesophageal cancer surgery. Acta Oncol. 2020;59(6):613–19.

https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2020.1741677

von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, et al. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(8):573–7.

https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010

Ludvigsson JF, Svedberg P, Olen O, Bruze G, Neovius M. The longitudinal integrated database for health insurance and labour market studies (LISA) and its use in medical research. Eur J Epidemiol. 2019;34(4):423–37.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-019-00511-8

Ludvigsson JF, Andersson E, Ekbom A, Feychting M, Kim JL, Reuterwall C, et al. External review and validation of the Swedish national inpatient register. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:450.

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-450

Barlow L, Westergren K, Holmberg L, Talback M. The completeness of the Swedish Cancer Register: a sample survey for year 1998. Acta Oncol. 2009;48(1):27–33.

https://doi.org/10.1080/02841860802247664

Brusselaers N, Lagergren J. The Charlson comorbidity index in registry-based research. Methods Inf Med. 2017;56(5):401–6.

https://doi.org/10.3414/ME17-01-0051

Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–83.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8

Brooke HL, Talback M, Hornblad J, Johansson LA, Ludvigsson JF, Druid H, et al. The Swedish cause of death register. Eur J Epidemiol. 2017;32(9):765–73.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-017-0316-1

Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250(2):187–96.

https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2

Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez J, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85(5):365–76.

https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/85.5.365

Lagergren P, Fayers P, Conroy T, Stein HJ, Sezer O, Hardwick R, et al. Clinical and psychometric validation of a questionnaire module, the EORTC QLQ-OG25, to assess health-related quality of life in patients with cancer of the oesophagus, the oesophago-gastric junc-tion and the stomach. Eur J Cancer. 2007;43(14):2066–73.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2007.07.005

Fayers P, Aaronson N, Bjordal K, Groenvold M, Curran D, Bottomley A. The EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring manual. 3rd ed. Brussels: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer; 2001.

Cocks K, King MT, Velikova G, de Castro G, Jr., Martyn St-James M, Fayers PM, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for interpreting change scores for the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30. Eur J Can-cer. 2012;48(11):1713–21.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2012.02.059

King MT. The interpretation of scores from the EORTC quality of life questionnaire QLQ-C30. Qual Life Res. 1996;5(6):555–67.

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00439229

Osoba D, Rodrigues G, Myles J, Zee B, Pater J. Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. J Clin Oncol. 1998;16(1):139–44.

https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1998.16.1.139

Bona D, Manara M, Bonitta G, Guerrazzi G, Guraj J, Lombardo F, et al. Long-term impact of severe postoperative complications after esop-hagectomy for cancer: individual patient data meta-analysis. Cancers (Basel). 2024;16(8):1468.

https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16081468

Kauppila JH, Johar A, Lagergren P. Postoperative complications and health-related quality of life 10 years after esophageal cancer surgery. Ann Surg. 2020;271(2):311–16.

https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002972

Schandl A, Cheng Z, Johar A, Lagergren P. Health-related quality of life 15 years after oesophageal cancer surgery: a prospective nation-wide cohort study. J Cancer Surviv. 2022;17(3):815–25.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-022-01257-1

Taioli E, Schwartz RM, Lieberman-Cribbin W, Moskowitz G, van Gerwen M, Flores R. Quality of life after open or minimally invasive esoph-agectomy in patients with esophageal cancer – a systematic review. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;29(3):377–90.

https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semtcvs.2017.08.013

Maas KW, Cuesta MA, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Roig J, Bonavina L, Rosman C, et al. Quality of life and late complications after minimal-ly invasive compared to open esophagectomy: results of a randomized trial. World J Surg. 2015;39(8):1986–93.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3100-y

Li Z, Liu C, Liu Y, Yao S, Xu B, Dong G. Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervi-cal anastomosis: a retrospective study. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020;15(1):128.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-020-01182-3

Derogar M, van der Schaaf M, Lagergren P. Reference values for the EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life questionnaire in a random sample of the Swedish population. Acta Oncol. 2012;51(1):10–16.

https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2011.614636

Additional Files

Published

2024-12-27

How to Cite

Lagergren, P., Johar, A., & Schandl, A. (2024). Postoperative complications and health-related quality of life after oesophageal cancer surgery: a national, population-based cohort study. Acta Oncologica, 63(1), 974–981. https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2024.41290