Fidelity of the Guided Self-Determination program in the MyHealth study during breast cancer follow-up
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42253Keywords:
Breast cancer, nurse-led, follow-up, fidelity, acceptanceAbstract
Background and purpose: MyHealth is a new follow-up program including individual nurse-led sessions based on Guided Self-Determination (GSD), which has been shown to improve health and psychological outcomes in patients after treatment for breast cancer. Fidelity assessment is important to support the implementation of GSD in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was thus to investigate fidelity and acceptance of the GSD program in the MyHealth study and whether sociodemographic and psychological factors were associated with patients’ completion of the GSD program and completion of reflection sheets.
Material and methods: We assessed fidelity quantitatively by examining patients’ completion of the GSD program (i.e. ≥3 sessions), completion of the reflection sheets and their associations with sociodemographic and psychological factors among 239 patients, and nurse-reported acceptance qualitatively through a focus group interview with all five nurses providing the GSD program.
Results: A total of 81% of patients completed the GSD program, while 71% of the reflection sheets were completed. Including a relative in a GSD session and lower education were significantly associated with completion of the program. Younger age and including a relative in a GSD session were significantly associated with completion of reflection sheets. Nurses found GSD highly applicable and especially appreciated a values-clarifying GSD reflection sheet and the inclusion of a relative.
Interpretation: The GSD program was applied with moderate-to-high fidelity, and the inclusion of relatives is potentially valuable. The GSD program indicates high usability and potential for being translated into clinical practice.
Downloads
References
Saltbæk L, Horsbøl TA, Holländer NH, Svendsen MN, Dalton SO, Johansen C. MyHealth: specialist nurse-led follow-up in breast cancer. A randomized controlled trial – development and feasibility. Acta Oncol. 2019;85(5):619–26.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2018.1563717 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2018.1563717
Cardoso F, Kyriakides S, Ohno S, Penault-Llorca F, Poortmans P, Rubio IT, et al. Early breast cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(8):1194–220.
https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdz173 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdz173
Runowicz CD, Leach CR, Henry NL, Henry KS, Mackey HT, Cowens‐Alvarado RL, et al. American Cancer Society/American Society of Clinical Oncology Breast Cancer Survivorship Care Guideline. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(1):43–73.
https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21319 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21319
Fiszer C, Dolbeault S, Sultan S, Brédart A. Prevalence, intensity, and predictors of the supportive care needs of women diagnosed with breast cancer: a systematic review. Psychooncology. 2014;23(4):361–74.
https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3432 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3432
Høeg BL, Bidstrup PE, Karlsen RV, Friberg AS, Albieri V, Dalton SO, et al. Follow‐up strategies following completion of primary cancer treatment in adult cancer survivors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;2019(11):CD012425.
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd012425.pub2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012425.pub2
Zoffmann V, Lauritzen T. Guided self-determination improves life skills with Type 1 diabetes and A1C in randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;64(1–3):78–86.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2005.11.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2005.11.017
Olesen ML, Duun-Henriksen AK, Hansson H, Ottesen B, Andersen KK, Zoffmann V. A person-centered intervention targeting the psychosocial needs of gynecological cancer survivors: a randomized clinical trial. J Cancer Surviv. 2016;10(5):832–41.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-016-0528-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-016-0528-5
Wendelboe C, Strandsberg C, Toft-Petersen C, Vind AB. REHPA Årsrapport 2022 [Internet]. Nyborg: REHPA, Videncenter for Rehabilitering og Palliation; 2023. Available from: https://www.rehpa.dk/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/REHPA_aarsrapport_2022_WEB.pdf [cited 2025 Jan 10]
Guided self-determination [Internet]. [cited 2025 Jan 10]. Our Why. Available from: https://www.gsd.healthcare/why
Saltbæk L, Bidstrup PE, Karlsen RV, Høeg BL, Horsboel TA, Belmonte F, et al. Nurse-led individualized follow-up versus regular physician-led visits after early breast cancer (MyHealth): a phase III randomized, controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(17):2038–49.
https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.23.01447 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.23.01447
Borrelli B. The assessment, monitoring, and enhancement of treatment fidelity in public health clinical trials: treatment fidelity in clinical trials. J Public Health Dent. 2011;71:S52–63.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-7325.2011.00233.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-7325.2011.00233.x
Preyde M, Burnham PV. Intervention fidelity in psychosocial oncology. J Evid Based Soc Work. 2011;8(4):379–96.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15433714.2011.542334 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15433714.2011.542334
Sekhon M, Cartwright M, Francis JJ. Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):88.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2031-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-017-2031-8
Flannery M, Stein K, Dougherty D, Mohile S, Guido J, Wells N. Nurse-delivered symptom assessment for individuals with advanced lung cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2018;45(5):619–30.
https://doi.org/10.1188/18.ONF.619-630 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1188/18.ONF.619-630
Osann K, Wenzel L, Dogan A, Hsieh S, Chase DM, Sappington S, et al. Recruitment and retention results for a population-based cervical cancer biobehavioral clinical trial. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;121(3):558–64.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.02.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.02.007
Roick J, Danker H, Kersting A, Briest S, Dietrich A, Dietz A, et al. Factors associated with non-participation and dropout among cancer patients in a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2018;27(1):e12645.
https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12645 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.12645
Blanco C, Markowitz JC, Hellerstein DJ, Nezu AM, Wall M, Olfson M, et al. A randomized trial of interpersonal psychotherapy, problem solving therapy, and supportive therapy for major depressive disorder in women with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;173(2):353–64.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-4994-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-4994-5
Applebaum AJ, Lichtenthal WG, Pessin HA, Radomski JN, Gökbayrak NS, Katz AM, et al. Factors associated with attrition from a randomized controlled trial of meaning-centered group psychotherapy for patients with advanced cancer. Psychooncology. 2012;21(11):1195–204.
https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.2013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.2013
Borrelli B, Sepinwall D, Ernst D, Bellg AJ, Czajkowski S, Breger R, et al. A new tool to assess treatment fidelity and evaluation of treatment fidelity across 10 years of health behavior research. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005;73(5):852–60.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.73.5.852 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.73.5.852
Zoffmann V, Kirkevold M. Realizing empowerment in difficult diabetes care: a guided self-determination intervention. Qual Health Res. 2012;22(1):103–18.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732311420735 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732311420735
Brady MJ, Cella DF, Mo F, Bonomi AE, Tulsky DS, Lloyd SR, et al. Reliability and validity of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-breast quality-of-life instrument. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15(3):974–86.
https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1997.15.3.974 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1997.15.3.974
Kroenke K, Spitzer RL. The PHQ-9: a new depression diagnostic and severity measure. Psychiatr Ann. 2002;32(9):509–15.
https://doi.org/10.3928/0048-5713-20020901-06 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/0048-5713-20020901-06
Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW, Löwe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(10):1092.
https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092
Hibbard JH, Mahoney ER, Stockard J, Tusler M. Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure. Health Serv Res. 2005;40(6p1):1918–30.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00438.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00438.x
Thewes B, Zachariae R, Christensen S, Nielsen T, Butow P. The concerns about recurrence questionnaire: validation of a brief measure of fear of cancer recurrence amongst Danish and Australian breast cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv. 2015;9(1):68–79.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-014-0383-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-014-0383-1
Al-Windi A, Elmfeldt D, Tibblin G, Svärdsudd K. The influence of sociodemographic characteristics on well-being and symptoms in a Swedish community: results from a postal questionnaire survey. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1999;17(4):201–9.
https://doi.org/10.1080/028134399750002412 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/028134399750002412
Halkier B. Chapter 5: Fokusgrupper. In: Brinkmann S, Tanggaard L, editors. Kvalitative metoder En grundbog. 1st ed. Hans Reitzels Forlag, København; 2010. p. 121–36.
Attride-Stirling J. Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qual Res. 2001;1(3):385–405.
https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100307 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100307
Teo I, Vilardaga JP, Tan YP, Winger J, Cheung YB, Yang GM, et al. A feasible and acceptable multicultural psychosocial intervention targeting symptom management in the context of advanced breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2020;29(2):389–97.
https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5275 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5275
Zoffmann V, Jørgensen R, Graue M, Biener SN, Brorsson AL, Christensen CH, et al. Person‐specific evidence has the ability to mobilize relational capacity: a four‐step grounded theory developed in people with long‐term health conditions. Nurs Inq. 2023;30(3):e12555.
https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12555 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12555
Hurtado-de-Mendoza A, Cabling ML, Lobo T, Dash C, Sheppard VB. Behavioral interventions to enhance adherence to hormonal therapy in breast cancer survivors: a systematic literature review. Clin Breast Cancer. 2016;16(4):247–55.e3.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2016.03.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2016.03.006
Bellg AJ, Borrelli B, Resnick B, Hecht J, Minicucci DS, Ory M, et al. Enhancing treatment fidelity in health behavior change studies: best practices and recommendations from the NIH Behavior Change Consortium. Health Psychol. 2004;23(5):443–51.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.23.5.443 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.23.5.443
Carroll C, Patterson M, Wood S, Booth A, Rick J, Balain S. A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implement Sci. 2007;2(40):1–9.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-2-40 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-2-40
Bidstrup PE, Christensen J, Mertz BG, Rottmann N, Dalton SO, Johansen C. Trajectories of distress, anxiety, and depression among women with breast cancer: looking beyond the mean. Acta Oncol Stockh Swed. 2015;54(5):789–96.
https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2014.1002571 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186X.2014.1002571
Husted GR, Esbensen BA, Hommel E, Thorsteinsson B, Zoffmann V. Adolescents developing life skills for managing type 1 diabetes: a qualitative, realistic evaluation of a guided self‐determination‐youth intervention. J Adv Nurs. 2014;70(11):2634–50.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12413 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12413
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sigrid N. Biener, Beverley L. Høeg, Lena Saltbæk, Susanne O. Dalton, Christoffer Johansen, Randi V. Karlsen, Federica Belmonte, Vibeke Zoffmann, Pernille E. Bidstrup
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
