Clinical characteristics and treatment outcome in p16 negative anal cancer

Authors

  • Catherine Burgos Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
  • Calin Radu Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
  • Sofia Heyman Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
  • Nina Cavalli-Björkman Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
  • Peter Nygren Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42498

Keywords:

Anal cell carcinoma, sqaumous cell carcinoma, p16, Anal carcinoma, anal cancinoma, anal cancer, Anal cancer biopsies

Abstract

Background: Anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) is linked to human papillomavirus infection with p16 being positive in about 85% of cases. Overall survival (OS) of ASCC is 60%–80%. Prognosis in p16 negative (p16-) ASCC is worse with an OS of 30%–60%. It is important to elucidate differences in p16+ and p16- ASCC characteristics and outcome.

Methods: Consecutive ASCC patients (n = 380) treated with curative intent in Uppsala 2017–2022 were reviewed and analyzed retrospectively. A cohort of p16- patients (n = 30) from Gothenburg was included as a validation cohort.

Results: Ninety-one per cent (n = 347) were p16+ and 9% (n = 33) p16-. Median follow-up was 33 months (range 4–78). p16- status was associated with higher age (≥65 years; p = 0.03), comorbidity (p = 0.03), male sex (p = 0.001) and perianal localization (p < 0.001). At 3 years progression free survival was 50% and 81% (p <0.0001) and OS 60% and 89% (p < 0.0001) for p16- and p16+ patients, respectively. Male sex, advanced T-stage (T3-4), N+ disease, advance treatment and p16- status were associated with inferior OS (p = 0.01 – p < 0.0001). In the p16- subgroup, advanced T-stage and intensive treatment were negative prognostic factors for OS (p = 0.007 and 0.009, respectively) but no clinical characteristic predicted persistent disease. The p16- validation cohort essentially confirmed the findings from the main cohort.

Interpretation: p16- ASCC is a disease subset with specific clinical features and poor prognosis in need of improved treatment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Calin Radu, Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

 

 

References

Deshmukh AA, Suk R, Shiels MS, Sonawane K, Nyitray AG, Liu Y, et al. Recent trends in squamous cell carcinoma of the anus incidence and mortality in the United States, 2001–2015. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020;112(8):829–38.

https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djz219 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djz219

Rao S, Guren MG, Khan K, Brown G, Renehan AG, Steigen SE, et al. Anal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up(¡Ù). Ann Oncol. 2021;32(9):1087–100.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2021.06.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2021.06.015

Frisch M, Glimelius B, Van den Brule AJC, Wohlfahrt J, Meijer CJLM, Walboomers JMM, et al. Sexually transmitted infection as a cause of anal cancer. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(19):1350–8.

https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199711063371904 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199711063371904

Daling JR, Madeleine MM, Johnson LG, Schwartz SM, Shera KA, Wurscher MA, et al. Human papillomavirus, smoking, and sexual practices in the etiology of anal cancer. Cancer. 2004;101(2):270–80.

https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20365 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20365

Maniar KP, Nayar R. HPV-related squamous neoplasia of the lower anogenital tract: an update and review of recent guidelines. Adv Anat Pathol. 2014;21(5):341–58.

https://doi.org/10.1097/PAP.0000000000000035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PAP.0000000000000035

Jhaveri J, Rayfield L, Liu Y, Chowdhary M, Cassidy RJ, Madden NA, et al. Prognostic relevance of human papillomavirus infection in anal squamous cell carcinoma: analysis of the national cancer data base. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2017;8(6):998–1008.

https://doi.org/10.21037/jgo.2017.10.05 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jgo.2017.10.05

Guren MG, Aagnes B, Nygård M, Dahl O, Møller B. Rising incidence and improved survival of anal squamous cell carcinoma in Norway, 1987–2016. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2019;18(1):e96–103.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcc.2018.10.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clcc.2018.10.001

De Vuyst H, Clifford GM, Nascimento MC, Madeleine MM, Franceschi S. Prevalence and type distribution of human papillomavirus in carcinoma and intraepithelial neoplasia of the vulva, vagina and anus: a meta-analysis. Int J Cancer. 2009;124(7):1626–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.24116

Upadhyay L, Hartzell M, Parikh AR, Strickland MR, Klempner S, Malla M. Recent advances in the management of anal cancer. Healthcare. 2023;11(23):3010.

https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11233010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11233010

De Martel C, Plummer M, Vignat J, Franceschi S. Worldwide burden of cancer attributable to HPV by site, country and HPV type. Int J Cancer. 2017;141(4):664–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.30716

Nicolás I, Saco A, Barnadas E, Marimon L, Rakislova N, Fusté P, et al. Prognostic implications of genotyping and p16 immunostaining in HPV-positive tumors of the uterine cervix. Mod Pathol. 2020;33(1):128–37.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41379-019-0360-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41379-019-0360-3

Wolf J, Kist LF, Pereira SB, Quessada MA, Petek H, Pille A, et al. Human papillomavirus infection: epidemiology, biology, host interactions, cancer development, prevention, and therapeutics. Rev Med Virol. 2024;34(3):e2537. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rmv.2537

Urbute A, Rasmussen CL, Belmonte F, Obermueller T, Prigge E-S, Arbyn M, et al. Prognostic significance of HPV DNA and p16INK4a in anal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020;29(4):703–10.

https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-1259 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-1259

Obermueller T, Hautekiet J, Busto MP, Reynders D, Belgioia L, Cats A, et al. Prognostic value of high-risk human papillomavirus DNA and p16(INK4a) immunohistochemistry in patients with anal cancer: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2021;157:165–78.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2021.07.041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2021.07.041

Parwaiz I, MacCabe TA, Thomas MG, Messenger DE. A systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic biomarkers in anal squamous cell carcinoma treated with primary chemoradiotherapy. Clin Oncol. 2019;31(12):e1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2019.06.013

Koerber SA, Schoneweg C, Slynko A, Krug D, Haefner MF, Herfarth K, et al. Influence of human papillomavirus and p16(INK4a) on treatment outcome of patients with anal cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2014;113(3):331–6.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2014.11.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2014.11.013

Wakeham K, Murray L, Muirhead R, Hawkins MA, Sebag-Montefiore D, Brown S, et al. Multicentre investigation of prognostic factors incorporating p16 and tumour infiltrating lymphocytes for anal cancer after chemoradiotherapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2021;33(10):638–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2021.04.015

Alemany L, Saunier M, Alvarado-Cabrero I, Quirós B, Salmeron J, Shin HR, et al. Human papillomavirus DNA prevalence and type distribution in anal carcinomas worldwide. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(1):98–107.

https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.28963 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.28963

Meulendijks D, Tomasoa NB, Dewit L, Smits PHM, Bakker R, Van Velthuysen MLF, et al. HPV-negative squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal is unresponsive to standard treatment and frequently carries disruptive mutations in TP53. Br J Cancer. 2015;112(8):1358–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.20

Gilbert DC, Williams A, Allan K, Stokoe J, Jackson T, Linsdall S, et al. p16INK4A, p53, EGFR expression and KRAS mutation status in squamous cell cancers of the anus: correlation with outcomes following chemo-radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2013;109(1):146–51.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2013.08.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2013.08.002

Jones CM, Goh V, Sebag-Montefiore D, Gilbert DC. Biomarkers in anal cancer: from biological understanding to stratified treatment. Br J Cancer. 2017;116(2):156–62.

https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2016.398 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2016.398

Mai S, Welzel G, Ottstadt M, Lohr F, Severa S, Prigge ES, et al. Prognostic relevance of HPV infection and p16 overexpression in squamous cell anal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;93(4):819–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.08.004

Turchan WT, Liauw SL. Chemoradiation for anal cancer: clinical outcomes and strategies to optimize the therapeutic ratio according to HPV status. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2021;31(4):349–60.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semradonc.2021.02.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semradonc.2021.02.007

Serup-Hansen E, Linnemann D, Skovrider-Ruminski W, Høgdall E, Geertsen PF, Havsteen H. Human papillomavirus genotyping and p16 expression as prognostic factors for patients with american joint committee on cancer stages I to III carcinoma of the anal canal. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(17):1812–7.

https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.52.3464 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.52.3464

Balermpas P, Martin D, Wieland U, Rave-Fränk M, Strebhardt K, Rödel C, et al. Human papilloma virus load and PD-1/PD-L1, CD8(+) and FOXP3 in anal cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy: rationale for immunotherapy. Oncoimmunology. 2017;6(3):e1288331.

https://doi.org/10.1080/2162402X.2017.1288331 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2162402X.2017.1288331

Bruyere D, Monnien F, Colpart P, Roncarati P, Vuitton L, Hendrick E, et al. Treatment algorithm and prognostic factors for patients with stage I-III carcinoma of the anal canal: a 20-year multicenter study. Mod Pathol. 2021;34(1):116–30.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41379-020-0637-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41379-020-0637-6

Nilsson MP, Undseth C, Albertsson P, Eidem M, Havelund BM, Johannsson J, et al. Nordic anal cancer (NOAC) group consensus guidelines for risk-adapted delineation of the elective clinical target volume in anal cancer. Acta Oncol. 2023;62(8):897–906.

https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2023.2240490 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2023.2240490

Johnsson A, Norman D, Angenete E, Cavalli-Björkman N, Lagerbäck C, Leon O, et al. Anal cancer in Sweden 2015–2019. Implementation of guidelines, structural changes, national registry and early results. Acta Oncol. 2022;61(5):575–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2022.2048069

Rusten E, Rekstad BL, Undseth C, Klotz D, Hernes E, Guren MG, et al. Anal cancer chemoradiotherapy outcome prediction using (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and clinicopathological factors. Br J Radiol. 2019;92(1097):20181006.

https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20181006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20181006

Gondal TA, Chaudhary N, Bajwa H, Rauf A, Le D, Ahmed S. Anal cancer: the past, present and future. Curr Oncol. 2023;30(3):3232–50.

https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30030246 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30030246

Dahl O, Myklebust MP, Dale JE, Leon O, Serup-Hansen E, Jakobsen A, et al. Evaluation of the stage classification of anal cancer by the TNM 8th version versus the TNM 7th version. Acta Oncol. 2020;59(9):1016–23.

https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2020.1778180 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2020.1778180

Lee DH, Hwang NR, Lim MC, Yoo CW, Joo J, Kim JY, et al. Comparison of the performance of Anyplex II HPV HR, the Cobas 4800 human papillomavirus test and Hybrid Capture 2. Ann Clin Biochem. 2016;53(Pt 5):561–7.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0004563215614036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0004563215614036

Pasquier C, Sauné K, Raymond S, Boisneau J, Courtade M, Izopet J. Comparison of Cobas® HPV and Anyplex™ II HPV28 assays for detecting and genotyping human papillomavirus. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017;87(1):25–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.08.022

Northover J, Glynne-Jones R, Sebag-Montefiore D, James R, Meadows H, Wan S, et al. Chemoradiation for the treatment of epidermoid anal cancer: 13-year follow-up of the first randomised UKCCCR Anal Cancer Trial (ACT I). Br J Cancer. 2010;102(7):1123–8.

https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605605 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605605

Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8

Soares PC, Abdelhay ES, Thuler LCS, Soares BM, Demachki S, Ferro GVR, et al. HPV positive, wild type TP53, and p16 overexpression correlate with the absence of residual tumors after chemoradiotherapy in anal squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Gastroenterol. 2018;18(1):30.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-018-0758-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-018-0758-2

Iseas S, Mariano G, Gros L, Baba-Hamed N, De Parades V, Adam J, et al. Unraveling emerging anal cancer clinical biomarkers from current immuno-oncogenomics advances. Mol Diagn Ther. 2024;28(2):201–14.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s40291-023-00692-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40291-023-00692-9

Valvo F, Ciurlia E, Avuzzi B, Doci R, Ducreux M, Roelofsen F, et al. Cancer of the anal region. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2019;135:115–27.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2018.12.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2018.12.007

Takahashi R, Osumi H, Wakatsuki T, Yamamoto N, Taguchi S, Nakayama I, et al. Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for anal squamous cell carcinoma in Japan. Int J Clin Oncol. 2024;29:1161–1172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-024-02540-0

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3841871/v1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3841871/v1

Gilbert DC, Serup-Hansen E, Linnemann D, Høgdall E, Bailey C, Summers J, et al. Tumour-infiltrating lymphocyte scores effectively stratify outcomes over and above p16 post chemo-radiotherapy in anal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2016;114(2):134–7.

https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.448 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.448

Prete AA, Manca P, Messina M, Formica V, Frassineti GL, Zampino MG, et al. Extensive molecular profiling of squamous cell anal carcinoma in a phase 2 trial population: translational analyses of the ‘CARACAS’ study. Eur J Cancer. 2023;182:87–97.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2022.12.025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2022.12.025

Ciardiello D, Guerrera LP, Maiorano BA, Parente P, Latiano TP, Di Maio M, et al. Immunotherapy in advanced anal cancer: is the beginning of a new era? Cancer Treat Rev. 2022;105:102373.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2022.102373 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2022.102373

Additional Files

Published

2025-05-07

How to Cite

Burgos, C., Radu, C., Heyman, S., Cavalli-Björkman, N., & Nygren, P. (2025). Clinical characteristics and treatment outcome in p16 negative anal cancer. Acta Oncologica, 64, 633–640. https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42498