Radiotherapy quality assurance in the PROTECT trial – a European randomised phase III-trial comparing proton and photon therapy in the treatment of patients with oesophageal cancer

Authors

  • Camilla Skinnerup Byskov Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7196-0234
  • Hanna R. Mortensen Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
  • Marie-Claude Biston Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
  • Sara Broggi San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
  • Rebecca Bütof Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany; OncoRay – National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
  • Richard Canters Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, The Netherlands
  • Gilles Crehange Curie Institute, Paris, France
  • Gilles Defraene KU Leuven – University of Leuven - Department of Oncology – Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Belgium
  • Jerome Doyen Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
  • Mai L. Ehmsen Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
  • Silvia Fabiano University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  • Francesco Fracchiola Department of medical physics, APSS, Trento, Italy
  • Farid Goudjil Curie Institute, Paris, France
  • Karin Haustermans KU Leuven – University of Leuven - Department of Oncology – Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Belgium; University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Radiation Oncology, Belgium
  • Sarah E. Jensen Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
  • Maria F. Jensen Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
  • Marie Lecornu Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
  • Sebastian Makocki Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany; OncoRay – National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
  • Aurélia L. Mana Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
  • Andrea Martignano Department of medical physics, APSS, Trento, Italy
  • Arturs Meijers Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
  • Alfredo Mirandola National Centre of Oncology Adrotherapy, Pavia, Italy
  • Diana A. Mitrea Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
  • Christina T. Muijs Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, The Netherlands
  • Ditte S. Møller Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aarhus University, Denmark
  • Marianne Nordsmark Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
  • Ester Orlandi Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic, and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (Fondazione CNAO), Pavia, Italy
  • Panagiotis Balermpas 1University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  • Pieter Populaire KU Leuven – University of Leuven - Department of Oncology – Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Belgium; University Hospitals Leuven, Department of Radiation Oncology, Belgium
  • Daniele Scartoni Department of Proton Therapy, APSS, Trento
  • Jessica Serrand Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
  • Muhammad Shamshad EBG MedAustron GmbH, Austria
  • Najla Slim San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
  • Valentina Vanoni Department of Radiation Oncology, APSS, Trento, Italy
  • Anthony Vela Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
  • Marie Vidal Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
  • Gloria Vilches-Freixas Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, The Netherlands
  • Damien Weber Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
  • Lone Hoffmann Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aarhus University, Denmark

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42774

Keywords:

Radiotherapy quality assurance, clinical trials, oesophageal cancer

Abstract

Purpose: To present results from the trial radiotherapy quality assurance (RTQA) programme of the centres involved in the randomised phase-III PROton versus photon Therapy for esophageal Cancer – a Trimodality strategy (PROTECT)-trial, investigating the clinical effect of proton therapy (PT) vs. photon therapy (XT) for patients with oesophageal cancer.

Materials and methods: The pre-trial RTQA programme consists of benchmark target and organ at risk (OAR) delineations as well as treatment planning cases, a facility questionnaire and beam output audits. Continuous on-trial RTQA with individual case review (ICR) of the first two patients and every fifth patient at each participating site is performed. Patient-specific QA is mandatory for all patients. On-site visits are scheduled after the inclusion of the first two patients at two associated PT and XT sites. Workshops are arranged annually for all PROTECT participants.

Results: Fifteen PT/XT sites are enrolled in the trial RTQA programme. Of these, eight PT/XT sites have completed the entire pre-trial RTQA programme. Three sites are actively including patients in the trial. On-trial ICR was performed for 22 patients. For the delineation of targets and OARs, six major and 11 minor variations were reported, and for six patients, there were no remarks. One major and four minor variations were reported for the treatment plans. Three site visits and two annual workshops were completed.

Interpretation: A comprehensive RTQA programme was implemented for the PROTECT phase III trial. All centres adhered to guidelines for pre-trial QA. For on-trial QA, major variations were primarily seen for target delineations (< 30%), and no treatment plans required re-optimisation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Eyck BM, Van Lanschot JJB, Hulshof MCCM, van der Wilk BJ, Shapiro J, van Hagen P, et al. Ten-year outcome of neoadjuvant chemoradio-therapy plus surgery for esophageal cancer: the randomized controlled CROSS trial. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:1995–2004.

https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.03614 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.03614

Bosch DJ, Muijs CT, Mul VEM, Beukema JC, Hospers GAP, Burgerhof JGM, et al. Impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on postopera-tive course after curative-intent transthoracic esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:605–11.

https://doi.org/10.1245/S10434-013-3316-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3316-8

Routman DM, Garant A, Lester SC, Day CN, Harmsen WS, Sanheuza CT, et al. A comparison of grade 4 lymphopenia with proton versus photon radiation therapy for esophageal cancer. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2019;4:63–9.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ADRO.2018.09.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adro.2018.09.004

Shiraishi Y, Fang P, Xu C, Song J, Krishnan S, Koay EJ, et al. Severe lymphopenia during neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal cancer: a propensity matched analysis of the relative risk of proton versus photon-based radiation therapy. Radiother Oncol. 2018;128:154–60.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RADONC.2017.11.028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2017.11.028

Wang J, Wei C, Tucker SL, Myles B, Palmer M, Hofstetter WL, et al. Predictors of postoperative complications after trimodality therapy for esophageal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;86:885–91.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJROBP.2013.04.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.04.006

Lin SH, Merrell KW, Shen J, Verma V, Correa AM, Wang L, et al. Multi-institutional analysis of radiation modality use and postoperative outcomes of neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2017;123:376–81.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RADONC.2017.04.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2017.04.013

Lin SH, Zhang N, Godby J, Wang J, Marsh GD, Liao Z, et al. Radiation modality use and cardiopulmonary mortality risk in elderly patients with esophageal cancer. Cancer. 2016;122:917–28.

https://doi.org/10.1002/CNCR.29857 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29857

Mortensen HR, Populaire P, Hoffmann L, Moeller DS, Appelt A, Nafteux P, et al. Proton versus photon therapy for esophageal cancer – a trimodality strategy (PROTECT) NCT050555648: a multicenter international randomized phase III study of neoadjuvant proton ver-sus photon chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced esophageal cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2024;190:109980.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RADONC.2023.109980 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109980

Groom N, Wilson E, Lyn E, Faivre-Finn C. Is pre-trial quality assurance necessary? Experiences of the CONVERT Phase III randomized trial for good performance status patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer. Br J Radiol. 2014;87(1037):20130653.

https://doi.org/10.1259/BJR.20130653 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20130653

Purdy JA. Quality assurance issues in conducting multi-institutional advanced technology clinical trials. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;71:S66–70.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.07.2393 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.07.2393

Ibbott GS, Haworth A, Followill DS. Quality assurance for clinical trials. Front Oncol. 2013;3:311.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2013.00311 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2013.00311

Weber DC, Tomsej M, Melidis C, Hurkmans CW. QA makes a clinical trial stronger: evidence-based medicine in radiation therapy. Radiother Oncol. 2012;105:4–8.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2012.08.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2012.08.008

Peters LJ, O’Sullivan B, Giralt J, Fitzgerald TJ, Trotti A, Bernier J, et al. Critical impact of radiotherapy protocol compliance and quality in the treatment of advanced head and neck cancer: results from TROG 02.02. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2996–3001.

https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.27.4498 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.27.4498

Weber DC, Poortmans PMP, Hurkmans CW, Aird E, Gulyban A, Fairchild A. Quality assurance for prospective EORTC radiation oncology trials: the challenges of advanced technology in a multicenter international setting. Radiother Oncol. 2011;100:150–6.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2011.05.073 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2011.05.073

Ohri N, Shen X, Dicker AP, Doyle LA, Harrison AS, Showalter TN. Radiotherapy protocol deviations and clinical outcomes: a meta-analysis of cooperative group clinical trials. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105:387–93.

https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djt001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djt001

Lukovic J, Moore AJ, Lee MT, Willis D, Ahmed S, Akra M, et al. The feasibility of quality assurance in the TOPGEAR international phase 3 clinical trial of neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for gastric cancer (an Intergroup Trial of the AGITG/TROG/NHMRC CTC/EORTC/CCTG). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2023;117:1096–106.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.011

Tchelebi LT, Winter KA, Abrams RA, Safran HP, Regine WF, McNulty S, et al. Analysis of radiation therapy quality assurance in NRG oncolo-gy RTOG 0848. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2024;118:107–14.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.08.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.08.014

Kelly SM, Turcas A, Corning C, Bailey S, Cañete A, Clementel E, et al. Radiotherapy quality assurance in paediatric clinical trials: first report from six QUARTET-affiliated trials. Radiother Oncol. 2023;182:109549.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109549 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109549

Lambrecht M, Melidis C, Sonke JJ, Adebahr S, Boellaard R, Verheij M, et al. Lungtech, a phase II EORTC trial of SBRT for centrally located lung tumours – a clinical physics perspective. Radiat Oncol. 2016;11:7.

https://doi.org/10.1186/S13014-015-0567-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-015-0567-5

Clark CH, Ga Aird E, Bolton S, Miles EA, Nisbet A, Snaith JA, et al. Radiotherapy dosimetry audit: three decades of improving standards and accuracy in UK clinical practice and trials. Br J Radiol. 2015;88(1055):20150251.

https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20150251 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20150251

Clark CH, Hurkmans CW, Kry SF. The role of dosimetry audit in lung SBRT multi-centre clinical trials. Phys Med. 2017;44:171–6.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJMP.2017.04.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.04.003

Thomas M, Mortensen HR, Hoffmann L, Møller DS, Troost EGC, Muijs CT, et al. Proposal for the delineation of neoadjuvant target volumes in oesophageal cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2021;156:102–12.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2020.11.032 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2020.11.032

Hoffmann L, Mortensen H, Shamshad M, Berbee M, Bizzocchi N, Bütof R, et al. Treatment planning comparison in the PROTECT-trial ran-domising proton versus photon beam therapy in oesophageal cancer: results from eight European centres. Radiother Oncol. 2022;172:32–41.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2022.04.029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2022.04.029

Shamshad M, Møller DS, Mortensen HR, Ehmsen ML, Jensen MF, Hoffmann L. Bone versus soft-tissue setup in proton therapy for patients with oesophageal cancer. Acta Oncol. 2022;61:994–1003.

https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2022.2091949 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2022.2091949

Apolle R, Brückner S, Frosch S, Rehm M, Thiele J, Valentini C, et al. Utility of fiducial markers for target positioning in proton radiotherapy of oesophageal carcinoma. Radiother Oncol. 2019;133:28–34.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RADONC.2018.12.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2018.12.016

Hoffmann L, Poulsen PR, Ravkilde T, Bertholet J, Kruhlikava I, Helbo BL, et al. Setup strategies and uncertainties in esophageal radiothera-py based on detailed intra- and interfractional tumor motion mapping. Radiother Oncol. 2019;136:161–8.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RADONC.2019.04.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2019.04.014

Miften M, Olch A, Mihailidis D, Moran J, Pawlicki T, Molineu A, et al. Tolerance limits and methodologies for IMRT measurement-based verification QA: recommendations of AAPM task group no. 218. Med Phys. 2018;45:e53–83.

https://doi.org/10.1002/MP.12810 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.12810

EORTC Beam output audit guidelines [Internet]. n.d. [cited 2024 Dec 20]. Available from: https://www.eortc.org/quality-assurance/rtqa/beam-output-audit-boa/

Pettersen MN, Aird E, Olsen DR. Quality assurance of dosimetry and the impact on sample size in randomized clinical trials. Radiother Oncol. 2008;86:195–9.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2007.07.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2007.07.001

Boustani J, Rivin Del Campo E, Blanc J, Peiffert D, Benezery K, Pereira R, et al. Quality assurance of dose-escalated radiation therapy in a randomized trial for locally advanced oesophageal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019;105:329–37.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJROBP.2019.06.2542 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.06.2542

Budiharto T, Musat E, Poortmans P, Hurkmans C, Monti A, Bar-Deroma R, et al. Profile of European radiotherapy departments contributing to the EORTC Radiation Oncology Group (ROG) in the 21st century. Radiother Oncol. 2008;88:403–10.

https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RADONC.2008.05.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2008.05.013

Grant W, Hurkmans CW, Poortmans PM, Maingon P, Monti AF, Van Os MJH, et al. Quality assurance quality assurance standards drive improvements in the profile of radiation therapy departments participating in trials of the EORTC Radiation Oncology Group. Radi-other Oncol. 2014;112:376–80.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2014.09.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2014.09.003

Wills L, Maggs R, Lewis G, Jones G, Nixon L, Staffurth J, et al. Quality assurance of the SCOPE 1 trial in oesophageal radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol. 2017;12:179.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-017-0916-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-017-0916-7

Brooks C, Miles E, Hoskin PJ. Radiotherapy trial quality assurance processes: a systematic review. Lancet Oncol. 2024;25:e104–13.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00625-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00625-3

Gwynne S, Higgins E, Poon King A, Radhakrishna G, Wills L, Mukherjee S, et al. Driving developments in UK oesophageal radiotherapy through the SCOPE trials. Radiat Oncol. 2019;14:26.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1225-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-019-1225-0

Bernier J, Horiot JC, Bartelink H, Johansson KA, Cionini L, Gonzalèz DG, et al. Profile of radiotherapy departments contributing to the Cooperative Group of Radiotherapy of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996;34:953–60.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(95)02177-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-3016(95)02177-9

Additional Files

Published

2025-03-13

How to Cite

Skinnerup Byskov, C., Mortensen, H. R., Biston, M.-C., Broggi, S., Bütof, R., Canters, R., … Hoffmann, L. (2025). Radiotherapy quality assurance in the PROTECT trial – a European randomised phase III-trial comparing proton and photon therapy in the treatment of patients with oesophageal cancer. Acta Oncologica, 64, 406–414. https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42774

Issue

Section

Original article