Treatment outcomes and the role of surgery in gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a population-based cohort study

Authors

  • Agnes Larsson Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Södertälje Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Emelie Wallin Department of Oncology and Pathology and Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska Institutet/University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0698-0930
  • Mats Nilsson Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7430-0116
  • Ulrika Joneborg Department of Women’s and Children’s Health and Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska Institutet/University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1922-0738

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2025.43274

Keywords:

Gestational trophoblastic disease, surgical treatment, Choriocarcinoma, epithelioid trophoblastic tumour, placental site trophoblastic tumour

Abstract

Background and purpose: Cure rates of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) are excellent, however the surgical interventions in disease management are not well described. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and types of surgical procedures used for management of GTN and to report treatment outcomes in a population-based cohort. The secondary aim was to assess the impact of hysterectomy on time to human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG)-normalisation in low-risk GTN.

Material and methods: Medical records of all patients treated for GTN at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden between 1994 and 2020 were screened for treatment outcomes, types of surgical procedures and complications. Regression models were used to assess if hysterectomy affected time to complete remission in low-risk GTN.

Results and interpretation: Over the 27-year study period, 185 patients with GTN were included. The primary complete remission rate was 98.4% and relapse rate 3.2%. Sixty-four patients (34.6%) underwent at least one surgical procedure; 39/154 (25.3%) of low-risk patients, 17/23 (73.9%) of high-risk patients and all (100%) patients with placental site or epithelioid trophoblastic tumour. No severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥3) were observed. Seven of 74 procedures (9.5%) were complicated by bleeding >1,000 mL or surgical site infection. Therapeutic hysterectomy significantly shortened time to hCG-normalisation in the low-risk group (48 vs 74 days, p = 0.002).

This population-based study confirms the excellent cure rates and low relapse rates for GTN. Surgery plays an important role in the management of GTN with low risk of complications. Hysterectomy shortens time to hCG normalisation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Seckl MJ, Sebire NJ, Berkowitz RS. Gestational trophoblastic disease. Lancet. 2010;376(9742):717–29.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60280-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60280-2

Lurain JR. Gestational trophoblastic disease I: epidemiology, pathology, clinical presentation and diagnosis of gestational trophoblastic disease, and management of hydatidiform mole. Am J Obst Gynecol. 2010;203(6):531–9.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.073 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.073

Ngan HYS, Seckl MJ, Berkowitz RS, Xiang Y, Golfier F, Sekharan PK, et al. Diagnosis and management of gestational trophoblastic disease: 2021 update. Int J Gynaecol Obst. 2021;155(Suppl. 1):86–93.

https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13877 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13877

Benedet JL, Bender H, Jones H, Ngan HY, Pecorelli S. FIGO staging classifications and clinical practice guidelines in the management of gynecologic cancers. FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. Int J Gynaecol Obst. 2000;70(2):209–62.

Goldstein DP, Berkowitz RS. Current management of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2012;26(1):111–31.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hoc.2011.10.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hoc.2011.10.007

Lima LDLA, Padron L, Câmara R, Sun SY, Rezende J, Braga A. The role of surgery in the management of women with gestational trophoblastic disease. Rev Col Brasil Cirurg. 2017;44(1):94–101.

https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-69912017001009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-69912017001009

Bolze P-A, Mathe M, Hajri T, You B, Dabi Y, Schott A-M, et al. First-line hysterectomy for women with low-risk non-metastatic gestational trophoblastic neoplasia no longer wishing to conceive. Gynecol Oncol. 2018;150(2):282–7.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.05.030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.05.030

Coopmans L, Larsson A, Joneborg U, Lok C, van Trommel N. Surgical management of gestational trophoblastic disease. Gynecol Obst Investig. 2024;89(3):214–29.

https://doi.org/10.1159/000534065 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000534065

Gorun F, Tomescu L, Motoc A, Citu C, Sas I, Serban DM, et al. Clinical features and management of trophoblastic epithelioid tumors: a systematic review. Medicine. 2022;101(30):e29934.

https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029934 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000029934

Horowitz NS, Goldstein DP, Berkowitz RS. Placental site trophoblastic tumors and epithelioid trophoblastic tumors: biology, natural history, and treatment modalities. Gynecol Oncol. 2017;144(1):208–14.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.10.024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.10.024

Seckl MJ, Sebire NJ, Fisher RA, Golfier F, Massuger L, Sessa C, et al. Gestational trophoblastic disease; ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up, Ann Oncol. 2013;24(Suppl. 6):vi39-50.

https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdt345 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdt345

Ludvigsson JF, Otterblad-Olausson P, Pettersson BU, Ekbom A. The Swedish personal identity number: possibilities and pitfalls in healthcare and medical research. Eur J Epidemiol. 2009;24(11):659–67.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-009-9350-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-009-9350-y

FIGO Oncology Committee. FIGO staging for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia 2000. FIGO Oncology Committee. Int J Gynaecol Obst. 2002;77(3):285–7.

https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7292(02)00063-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292(02)00063-2

Lok C, van Trommel N, Massuger L, Golfier F, Seckl M, Clinical Working Party of the EOTTD. Practical clinical guidelines of the EOTTD for treatment and referral of gestational trophoblastic disease. Eur J Cancer. 2020;130:228–40.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2020.02.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2020.02.011

Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13.

https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae

Alifrangis C, Agarwal R, Short D, Fisher RA, Sebire NJ, Harvey R, et al. EMA/CO for high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: good outcomes with induction low-dose etoposide-cisplatin and genetic analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(2):280–6.

https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.43.1817 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.43.1817

Newlands ES, Holden L, Seckl MJ, McNeish I, Strickland S, Rustin GJS. Management of brain metastases in patients with high-risk gestational trophoblastic tumors. J Reprod Med. 2002;47(6):465–71.

Flam F, Lundström V. Twenty years’ experience of treating gestational trophoblastic neoplasia in Sweden. Acta Obst Gynecol Scand. 1989;68(1):65–9.

https://doi.org/10.3109/00016348909087692 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/00016348909087692

Balachandran K, Salawu A, Ghorani E, Kaur B, Sebire NJ, Short D, et al. When to stop human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) surveillance after treatment with chemotherapy for gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN): a national analysis on over 4,000 patients. Gynecol Oncol. 2019;155(1):8–12.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.07.024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.07.024

Bower M, Newlands ES, Holden L, Short D, Brock C, Rustin GJ, et al. EMA/CO for high-risk gestational trophoblastic tumours: results from a cohort of 272 patients. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15(7):2636–43.

https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1997.15.7.2636 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1997.15.7.2636

Batman S, Skeith A, Allen A, Munro E, Caughey A, Bruegl A. Cost-effectiveness of second curettage for treatment of low-risk non-metastatic gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. Gynecol Oncol. 2020;157(3):711–15.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.03.029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.03.029

Albright BB, Ellett T, Knochenhauer HE, Goins EC, Monuszko KA, Kaplan SJ, et al. Treatments and outcomes in high-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2023;130(5):443–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17374

Flam F. Emergency surgery in gestational trophoblastic tumours. Eur J Obst Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1994;55(3):183–6.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-2243(94)90036-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-2243(94)90036-1

Eysbouts YK, Massuger LFAG, IntHout J, Lok CAR, Sweep FCGJ, Ottevanger PB. The added value of hysterectomy in the management of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. Gynecol Oncol. 2017;145(3):536–42.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.03.018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.03.018

Published

2025-06-23

How to Cite

Larsson, A., Wallin, E., Nilsson, M., & Joneborg, U. (2025). Treatment outcomes and the role of surgery in gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a population-based cohort study. Acta Oncologica, 64, 807–814. https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2025.43274