Fixation method influences FLASH skin sparing in an in vivo leg model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2025.43972Keywords:
FLASH radiotherapy, ultra-high dose rate, normal tissue sparing, acute skin damage, murine normal tissuesAbstract
Background and purpose: The FLASH effect, where ultra-high dose rate elicits a favourable normal tissue-sparing, has been shown in several preclinical studies. Study setup differences, for example fixation methods that affect blood flow, can influence radiation response but are unexplored for FLASH. This study compared FLASH’s acute skin-sparing effect with two fixation methods: a glued fixation (no blood flow restriction) and taped fixation (slight blood flow restriction).
Patient/material and methods: Female CDF1 mice were irradiated on their hind foot using a glue-fixation or tape-fixation method. Glue-fixated mice were only taped during the glueing procedure and had a 10-min unrestricted period afterwards before irradiation, while tape-fixated mice were taped shortly before and throughout irradiation. Mice received single-dose irradiation (19–58 Gy) with either conventional dose rate (CONV, protons 0.06 Gy/s, electrons 0.16 Gy/s) or FLASH (electrons, 223–233 Gy/s). Differences in skin toxicity were analysed.
Results: CONV-treated tape-fixated mice required a 16–17% higher dose to induce skin toxicity relative to glued mice for both protons and electrons. Meanwhile, the fixation method did not affect FLASH-treated mice. The resulting electron FLASH-sparing effect was reduced by 18% due to the shift in radiosensitivity for CONV-treated mice.
Interpretation: CONV-treated tape-fixated mice were more radioresistant than the glue-fixated mice, consistent with the expected response to mild hypoxia. FLASH-treated mice were unaffected. These findings demonstrate the impact of fixation and, in turn, oxygen level on the differential CONV versus FLASH skin response. The results highlight the importance of minimal systemic influence on animals during FLASH studies.
Downloads
References
Kim MM, Verginadis II, Goia D, Haertter A, Shoniyozov K, Zou W, et al. Comparison of FLASH proton entrance and the spread-out Bragg Peak dose regions in the sparing of mouse intestinal crypts and in a pancreatic tumor model. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13:4244.
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13164244 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13164244
Wei S, Lin H, Choi JI, Simone CB, Kang M. A novel proton pencil beam scanning FLASH RT delivery method enables optimal OAR sparing and ultra-high dose rate delivery: a comprehensive dosimetry study for lung tumors. Cancers. 2021;13:5790.
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13225790 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13225790
Sørensen BS, Sitarz MK, Ankjærgaard C, Johansen JG, Andersen CE, Kanouta E, et al. Pencil beam scanning proton FLASH maintains tumor control while normal tissue damage is reduced in a mouse model. Radiother Oncol. 2022;175:178–84.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2022.05.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2022.05.014
Montay-Gruel P, Acharya MM, Jorge PG, Petit B, Petridis IG, Fuchs P, et al. Hypofractionated FLASH-RT as an effective treatment against glioblastoma that reduces neurocognitive side effects in mice. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27:775–84.
https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-0894 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-0894
Diffenderfer ES, Verginadis II, Kim MM, Shoniyozov K, Velalopoulou A, Goia D, et al. Design, implementation, and in vivo validation of a novel proton FLASH radiation therapy system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020;106:440–8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.10.049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.10.049
Cunningham S, McCauley S, Vairamani K, Speth J, Girdhani S, Abel E, et al. FLASH proton pencil beam scanning irradiation minimizes radiation-induced leg contracture and skin toxicity in mice. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13:1–15.
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13051012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13051012
Levy K, Natarajan S, Wang J, Chow S, Eggold JT, Loo PE, et al. Abdominal FLASH irradiation reduces radiation-induced gastrointestinal toxicity for the treatment of ovarian cancer in mice. Sci Rep. 2020;10:1–14.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78017-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78017-7
Velalopoulou A, Karagounis IV, Cramer GM, Kim MM, Skoufos G, Goia D, et al. FLASH proton radiotherapy spares normal epithelial and mesenchymal tissues while preserving sarcoma response. Cancer Res. 2021;81:4808.
https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-21-1500 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-21-1500
Verginadis II, Velalopoulou A, Kim MM, Kim K, Paraskevaidis I, Bell B, et al. FLASH proton reirradiation, with or without hypofractionation, reduces chronic toxicity in the normal murine intestine, skin, and bone. Radiother Oncol. 2025;205:110744.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2025.110744 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2025.110744
Kristensen L, Rohrer S, Hoffmann L, Præstegaard LH, Ankjærgaard C, Andersen CE, et al. Electron vs proton FLASH radiation on murine skin toxicity. Radiother Oncol. 2025;206:110796.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2025.110796 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2025.110796
Soto LA, Casey KM, Wang J, Blaney A, Manjappa R, Breitkreutz D, et al. FLASH irradiation results in reduced severe skin toxicity compared to conventional-dose-rate irradiation. Radiat Res. 2020:194:618–24.
https://doi.org/10.1667/RADE-20-00090 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1667/RADE-20-00090
Sørensen BS, Kanouta E, Ankjærgaard C, Kristensen L, Johansen JG, Sitarz MK, et al. Proton FLASH: impact of dose rate and split dose on acute skin toxicity in a murine model. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2024;120(1):265–75.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.04.071 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.04.071
Singers Sørensen B, Krzysztof Sitarz M, Ankjærgaard C, Johansen J, Andersen CE, Kanouta E, et al. In vivo validation and tissue sparing factor for acute damage of pencil beam scanning proton FLASH. Radiother Oncol. 2022;167:109–15.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2021.12.022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2021.12.022
Kristensen L, Poulsen PR, Kanouta E, Rohrer S, Ankjærgaard C, Andersen CE, et al. Spread-out Bragg Peak FLASH: quantifying normal tissue toxicity in a murine model. Front Oncol. 2024:14:1427667.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1427667 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1427667
Schwarz G. Über Desensibiliserung Gegen Röntgen-Und Radi-umstrahlen. Munchener Medizinische Wochenschrift. 1909;24:1–2.
FRPT24 Abstract Book, FRPT24.; FLASH radiotherapy and particle therapy. 2024. Available from: https://2024.frpt-conference.org/
Overgaard CB, Reaz F, Poulsen P, Spejlborg H, Overgaard J, Grau C, et al. The fractionation effect on proton RBE in a late normal tissue damage model in vivo. Radiother Oncol. 2025;206:110792.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2025.110792 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2025.110792
Iturri L, Bertho A, Lamirault C, Brisebard E, Juchaux M, Gilbert C, et al. Oxygen supplementation in anesthesia can block FLASH effect and anti-tumor immunity in conventional proton therapy. Commun Med. 2023;3:1–13.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-023-00411-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-023-00411-9
Percie du Sert N, Hurst V, Ahluwalia A, Alam S, Avey MT, Baker M, et al. The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol. 2020;18:e3000410.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410
Overgaard CB, Reaz F, Sitarz M, Poulsen P, Overgaard J, Bassler N, et al. An experimental setup for proton irradiation of a murine leg model for radiobiological studies. Acta Oncol (Madr). 2023;62:1566–73.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2023.2246641 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2023.2246641
Posit team RStudio: Integrated Development for R 2025 [Internet]. Available from: https://posit.co/
GraphPad Software GraphPad Prism for Windows 2024 [Internet]. Available from: www.graphpad.com
Schwarz G. Merkwürdige Schwankungen Der Röntgenempfindlichkeit Bein Einem Und Demselben Patienten. Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrif. 1914;64:2597–8.
Petersson K, Adrian G, Butterworth K, McMahon SJ. A quantitative analysis of the role of oxygen tension in FLASH radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020;107:539–47.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.02.634 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.02.634
Poulsen PR, Johansen JG, Sitarz MK, Kanouta E, Kristensen L, Grau C, Sørensen BS. Oxygen enhancement ratio weighted dose quantitatively describes acute skin toxicity variations in mice after pencil beam scanning proton FLASH irradiation with changing doses and time structures. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2024;120(1):276–86.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.02.050 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.02.050
Pratx G, Kapp DS. Ultra-high-dose-rate FLASH irradiation may spare hypoxic stem cell niches in normal tissues. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019;105:190–2.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.05.030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.05.030
Montay-Gruel P, Acharya MM, Petersson K, Alikhani L, Yakkala C, Allen BD, et al. Long-term neurocognitive benefits of FLASH radiotherapy driven by reduced reactive oxygen species. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019; 166:10943–51.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1901777116 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1901777116
Loo BW, Verginadis II, Sørensen BS, Mascia AE, Perentesis JP, Koong AC, et al. Navigating the critical translational questions for implementing FLASH in the clinic. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2024;34:351–64.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semradonc.2024.04.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semradonc.2024.04.008
Zhang Q, Gerweck LE, Cascio E, Yang Q, Huang P, Niemierko A, et al. Proton FLASH effects on mouse skin at different oxygen tensions. Phys Med Biol. 2023;68(5):10.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/acb888 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/acb888
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Line Kristensen, Cathrine Overgaard, Jacob Johansen, Anna Holtz Hansen, Niels Bassler, Per Rugaard Poulsen, Brita Singers Sørensen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
